Samsung Galaxy A13 (SM-A137) vs Nokia C31 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Nokia C31
Nokia C31
Nokia

General

Launch Date July 1, 2022 September 1, 2022
Release Year 2022 2022

Physical

Volume 111 cm³ 113.5 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.38 "/g 3.38 "/g
Weight 195 g 200 g
Height 165.1 mm 169.2 mm
Width 76.4 mm 78 mm
Thickness 8.8 mm 8.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • Blue
  • White
  • Mint
  • Charcoal
  • Cyan

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.75 "
Resolution 1080 x 2408 720 x 1600
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 83.2 % 83.4 %
Pixel Density 400 PPI 260 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A N/A
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 110.84 mAh/in²
Battery Density 45.05 mAh/cm³ 44.49 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5050 mAh
NFC Support Yes No
Chipset Mediatek MT6769V/CU Helio G80 (12 nm) Unisoc SC9863A (28 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G52 MC2 IMG8322

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG microUSB 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 12
Maximum OS Version 13

Comparison Summary

Samsung Galaxy A13 vs. Nokia C31: A Detailed Comparison

Let's dive into a head-to-head comparison of the Samsung Galaxy A13 and the Nokia C31, dissecting their specifications and uncovering what they truly offer in terms of real-world performance.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A13 (SM-A137)Nokia C31Real-World Implications
Design
Dimensions (mm)165.1 x 76.4 x 8.8169.2 x 78 x 8.6A13 slightly more compact
Weight (g)195200Negligible difference in hand
Build MaterialPlasticPlasticDurability similar
Display
Size (inches)6.66.75C31 marginally larger screen
Resolution (px)1080 x 2408720 x 1600A13 significantly sharper
TypePLS LCDIPS LCDComparable color accuracy
PPI Density400260A13 much crisper visuals
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Helio G80 (12nm)Unisoc SC9863A (28nm)A13 more powerful and efficient
CPUOcta-core (2x2.0 GHz A75 & 6x1.8 GHz A55)Octa-core (4x1.6 GHz A55 & 4x1.2 GHz A55)A13 smoother multitasking, better gaming
GPUMali-G52 MC2IMG8322A13 superior graphics performance
RAM3/4GB4GBBoth adequate for basic tasks
OSAndroid 12 (up to 13)Android 12A13 guaranteed software updates
Camera
Rear Camera50MP (Main) + 5MP (Wide) + 2MP (Depth) + 2MP (Macro)13MP (Main) + 2MP (Depth) + 2MP (Macro)A13 higher resolution main camera
Front Camera8MP5MPA13 better selfie quality
Battery Life
Capacity (mAh)50005050Negligible difference
Charging25W Fast Charging10WA13 charges significantly faster

2. Key Insights

The Samsung Galaxy A13 boasts a significantly sharper display, thanks to its Full HD+ resolution. This translates to crisper text, more detailed images, and an overall more enjoyable viewing experience. Its more powerful processor and GPU also deliver a noticeable performance advantage, ensuring smoother multitasking and better gaming capabilities. The faster charging is a definite plus for users on the go.

The Nokia C31, while trailing in performance and display resolution, offers a slightly larger battery and the renowned Nokia durability. Its cleaner Android experience might appeal to users who prefer a less cluttered interface.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

Samsung Galaxy A13: Ideal for users who prioritize display quality, performance, and faster charging. This includes mobile gamers, content consumers, and those who frequently multitask.

Nokia C31: Best suited for users who value battery life, simplicity, and durability above all else. This might include users who primarily use their phones for calls, texting, and basic web browsing.

4. Buying Decision Framework

Questions to Ask Yourself:

  1. How important is display quality and sharpness to you?
  2. Do you frequently engage in demanding tasks like gaming or multitasking?
  3. How critical is fast charging in your daily routine?

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Student on a Budget: The Nokia C31's long battery life and affordability might be more appealing.
  • Casual User: Either phone could suffice, depending on individual priorities regarding display and performance.
  • Power User: The Samsung Galaxy A13's superior performance and display make it the clear winner.

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy A13

While the Nokia C31 offers a larger battery and a simpler software experience, the Samsung Galaxy A13's superior display, significantly better performance, faster charging, and guaranteed software updates make it the more compelling device for me. As someone who values a smooth and responsive user experience, coupled with visual clarity, the A13 aligns better with my needs. The difference in screen resolution alone is a major deciding factor, as I consume a lot of media on my phone. The performance gap, driven by the more advanced chipset in the A13, further solidifies my choice, ensuring the phone can handle my workflow with ease. The faster 25W charging is the icing on the cake, minimizing downtime and keeping me connected throughout the day.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.