Samsung Galaxy A13 (SM-A137) vs Motorola Razr 40 Ultra - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date July 1, 2022 June 5, 2023
Release Year 2022 2023

Physical

Volume 111 cm³ 88.47 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.38 "/g 3.74 "/g
Weight 195 g 184.5 g
Height 165.1 mm 170.8 mm
Width 76.4 mm 74 mm
Thickness 8.8 mm 7 mm
Foldable Design No Yes
Available Colors
  • Black
  • Blue
  • White
  • Glacier Blue
  • Viva Magenta
  • Infinite Black
  • Peach Fuzz

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.9 "
Resolution 1080 x 2408 1080 x 2640
Aspect Ratio 20:9 22:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 83.2 % 85.2 %
Pixel Density 400 PPI 413 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 165 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 1400 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 79.82 mAh/in²
Battery Density 45.05 mAh/cm³ 42.95 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 3800 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek MT6769V/CU Helio G80 (12 nm) Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Mali-G52 MC2 Adreno 730

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 13
Maximum OS Version 13 16

Comparison Summary

Let's dive into a comparative analysis of the Samsung Galaxy A13 and the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra. These two phones occupy very different spaces in the market, catering to distinct user needs and preferences.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A13 (SM-A137)Motorola Razr 40 UltraReal-World Implications
Design
Dimensions (mm)165.1 x 76.4 x 8.8170.8 x 74 x 7Razr 40 Ultra significantly more compact when folded; A13 larger screen for media consumption.
Weight (g)195184.5Razr 40 Ultra slightly lighter despite foldable design.
FoldableNoYesRazr offers pocketability and a unique form factor.
Display
Display TypePLS LCDFoldable LTPO AMOLEDRazr boasts superior contrast, vibrant colors, and smoother scrolling with higher refresh rate.
Size (inches)6.66.9Razr offers slightly larger main screen.
Resolution (px)1080 x 24081080 x 2640Comparable sharpness, but Razr's AMOLED provides a visually richer experience.
Refresh Rate (Hz)60 (Standard)165Razr offers incredibly smooth animations and scrolling.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Helio G80Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1Razr dramatically outperforms in demanding tasks, gaming, and multitasking.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.0 GHz A75 & 6x1.8 GHz A55)Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz X2 & 3x2.75 GHz A710 & 4x1.80 GHz A510)Razr offers flagship-level processing power.
RAM (GB)3/48/12Razr provides significantly more memory for seamless multitasking.
Camera
Rear Camera (MP)50 MP Main, 5MP Wide, 2MP others12MP Main, 13MP WideWhile A13 has higher resolution, Razr likely produces superior image quality due to processing power and sensor quality.
Front Camera (MP)832Razr boasts a much higher resolution selfie camera.
Battery Life
Capacity (mAh)50003800A13 has a larger battery capacity suggesting longer battery life, however Razr's LTPO display could help compensate.

2. Key Insights

The Samsung Galaxy A13 is a budget-friendly phone focused on providing essential features at an affordable price. Its strengths lie in its long battery life and large display, making it suitable for media consumption and general use. However, its performance is limited compared to the Razr.

The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is a premium, foldable flagship device. Its standout features are its innovative foldable design, powerful performance, stunning display, and external display for quick interactions. The trade-off is a smaller battery and a significantly higher price.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

A13: Best for budget-conscious users who prioritize battery life and a large screen for media consumption, casual gaming, and everyday tasks. Students, casual users, and those seeking a reliable secondary device would find this suitable.

Razr 40 Ultra: Ideal for tech enthusiasts, early adopters, and those who value cutting-edge design and top-tier performance. Professionals who need a powerful device for multitasking and appreciate the compact form factor would benefit from this phone.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  1. What is your budget? The A13 is significantly more affordable than the Razr 40 Ultra.
  2. What are your performance needs? For demanding tasks and gaming, the Razr 40 Ultra is the clear winner. For everyday tasks, the A13 is sufficient.
  3. Do you prioritize portability and innovative design? The Razr 40 Ultra's foldable design offers unique advantages in portability.

My Choice

If I were choosing between these two phones, I would pick the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra. While the price is significantly higher, the innovative foldable design, coupled with the flagship-level performance and stunning display, aligns better with my personal preferences and usage patterns. I appreciate cutting-edge technology and value a device that can handle demanding tasks without compromise. The compact form factor of the Razr is also appealing. While the battery life might be a concern, I am willing to make that trade-off for the overall package the Razr offers.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.