Samsung Galaxy A13 (SM-A137) vs Motorola Edge 50 Fusion - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date July 1, 2022 May 15, 2024
Release Year 2022 2024

Physical

Volume 111 cm³ 93.5 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.38 "/g 3.83 "/g
Weight 195 g 174.9 g
Height 165.1 mm 161.9 mm
Width 76.4 mm 73.1 mm
Thickness 8.8 mm 7.9 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • Blue
  • White
  • Forest Blue
  • Marshmallow Blue
  • Hot Pink

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.7 "
Resolution 1080 x 2408 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 83.2 % 91.6 %
Pixel Density 400 PPI 393 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 1600 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 111.38 mAh/in²
Battery Density 45.05 mAh/cm³ 53.48 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek MT6769V/CU Helio G80 (12 nm) Qualcomm SM7435-AB Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4 nm) - International
CPU Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.40 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) - International
GPU Mali-G52 MC2 Adreno 710

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 14
Maximum OS Version 13 17

Comparison Summary

Samsung Galaxy A13 vs. Motorola Edge 50 Fusion: A Deep Dive

Let's dissect the Samsung Galaxy A13 and the Motorola Edge 50 Fusion, going beyond the spec sheet to uncover what these phones offer in the real world.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A13 (SM-A137)Motorola Edge 50 FusionReal-World Implications
Design
Dimensions (mm)165.1 x 76.4 x 8.8161.9 x 73.1 x 7.9Edge 50 Fusion is slightly more compact and potentially easier to handle.
Weight (g)195174.9Edge 50 Fusion feels noticeably lighter in hand.
Display
Display TypePLS LCDP-OLEDEdge 50 Fusion offers deeper blacks, more vibrant colors, and potentially better power efficiency.
Refresh RateUnspecified120Hz (LATAM), 144Hz (INT)Edge 50 Fusion provides a significantly smoother and more responsive user experience.
Size (inches)6.66.7Negligible difference in screen real estate.
Resolution1080 x 24081080 x 2400Virtually identical sharpness.
Peak BrightnessUnspecified1600 nitsEdge 50 Fusion should offer superior visibility in direct sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Helio G80Snapdragon 7s Gen 2Edge 50 Fusion boasts a significantly more powerful processor, leading to faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.0 GHz A75 & 6x1.8 GHz A55)Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz A78 & 4x1.95 GHz A55)Edge 50 Fusion's CPU architecture provides a substantial performance advantage.
RAM3/4GB8GBMore RAM in the Edge 50 Fusion enables seamless multitasking and prevents apps from closing in the background.
Camera
Main Camera50MP50MPBoth offer high-resolution main sensors, but image quality will depend on sensor size, processing, and lens quality. Motorola states OIS, which is likely to improve low light photography.
Video Recording1080p@30fps4K@30fpsEdge 50 Fusion allows for higher resolution video recording.
Selfie Camera8MP32MPEdge 50 Fusion has a significantly higher resolution front-facing camera for better selfies and video calls.
Battery Life
Capacity5000 mAh5000 mAhSimilar battery capacities suggest comparable battery life, but real-world usage will vary.
Fast Charging25W68WEdge 50 Fusion charges significantly faster.

2. Key Insights

The Motorola Edge 50 Fusion demonstrably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A13 in nearly every category. Its Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 processor, coupled with 8GB of RAM, provides a significant performance advantage. The P-OLED display with a high refresh rate delivers a superior visual experience. While both phones have a 50MP main camera, the Edge 50 Fusion offers 4K video recording and OIS. The 68W fast charging on the Edge 50 Fusion is a major plus for users who need a quick power boost. The A13's strengths lie primarily in its affordability and potentially wider availability.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Samsung Galaxy A13: Best suited for budget-conscious users who prioritize basic smartphone functionality: calling, texting, web browsing, and social media. Less demanding users, who aren't focused on heavy multitasking or gaming, may find the A13 sufficient.
  • Motorola Edge 50 Fusion: Ideal for users who demand a more fluid and responsive experience. Gamers, multitaskers, content creators, and those who value a vibrant display and fast charging will appreciate the Edge 50 Fusion's capabilities.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  • What is your budget? The A13 is a budget-friendly option, while the Edge 50 Fusion sits in the mid-range price segment.
  • What are your primary smartphone uses? For basic tasks, the A13 may suffice. For demanding applications, the Edge 50 Fusion is the clear winner.
  • How important is display quality and performance? The Edge 50 Fusion's P-OLED display and powerful processor provide a noticeable upgrade over the A13's LCD and less powerful chipset.

My Choice: Motorola Edge 50 Fusion

If I were choosing between these two phones, I'd opt for the Motorola Edge 50 Fusion. While the Samsung Galaxy A13 offers decent value for its price, the Edge 50 Fusion provides a significantly better overall user experience. The performance difference alone, driven by the Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 and ample RAM, would be a deciding factor for me. The superior display, faster charging, and more capable camera system solidify the Edge 50 Fusion as the clear winner in my book. I value a smooth, responsive experience and appreciate the future-proofing offered by the Edge 50 Fusion's more advanced technology. The price difference is justified by the significant leap in performance and features.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.