Samsung Galaxy A13 (SM-A137) vs Cubot KingKong X - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date July 1, 2022 July 23, 2024
Release Year 2022 2024

Physical

Volume 111 cm³ 262.7 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.38 "/g 1.7 "/g
Weight 195 g 388 g
Height 165.1 mm 170.9 mm
Width 76.4 mm 82.2 mm
Thickness 8.8 mm 18.7 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • Blue
  • White
  • Black

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.58 "
Resolution 1080 x 2408 1080 x 2408
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 83.2 % 74.2 %
Pixel Density 400 PPI 401 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 235.59 mAh/in²
Battery Density 45.05 mAh/cm³ 38.83 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 10200 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek MT6769V/CU Helio G80 (12 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G52 MC2 Mali-G68 MC4

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 N/A
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 14
Maximum OS Version 13

Comparison Summary

Let's dive into a comparative analysis of the Samsung Galaxy A13 and the Cubot KingKong X, dissecting their specifications and translating them into real-world implications for you.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A13 (SM-A137)Cubot KingKong XReal-World Implications
Design
Dimensions (mm)165.1 x 76.4 x 8.8170.9 x 82.2 x 18.7KingKong X significantly larger and thicker, emphasizing ruggedness over pocketability.
Weight (g)195388KingKong X much heavier, reflecting its robust build and larger battery.
Display
Size (inches)6.66.58Virtually identical screen real estate.
Resolution (px)1080 x 24081080 x 2408Same sharpness and detail on both displays.
TypePLS LCDIPS LCD, 120HzKingKong X boasts a smoother 120Hz refresh rate for more fluid animations and scrolling. A13 uses PLS LCD which offers slight improvements over traditional IPS LCD in terms of color accuracy and viewing angles
Performance
ChipsetHelio G80 (12nm)Dimensity 7050 (6nm)KingKong X has a significantly more powerful and efficient processor, enabling smoother multitasking and gaming.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.0 GHz A75 & 6x1.8 GHz A55)Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz A78 & 6x2.0 GHz A55)KingKong X possesses faster CPU cores for improved responsiveness.
RAM3/4GB16GBKingKong X offers substantially more RAM, allowing for seamless app switching and handling demanding tasks.
Storage32/64GB512GBKingKong X provides vastly more storage for apps, photos, and videos.
Camera
Main Camera50MP100MPKingKong X has a higher resolution main camera sensor, potentially capturing more detail. However, megapixels aren't everything; image quality depends on factors like sensor size and processing.
Selfie Camera8MP32MPKingKong X has a much higher resolution front-facing camera for better selfies and video calls.
Battery Life
Capacity (mAh)500010200KingKong X has over double the battery capacity, promising significantly longer usage time.

2. Key Insights

  • Performance: The Cubot KingKong X is the clear winner in terms of performance, thanks to its more powerful Dimensity 7050 chipset, a substantial 16GB of RAM, and ample 512GB storage. The A13, while adequate for basic tasks, will likely struggle with demanding applications or heavy multitasking.
  • Display: While both phones offer similar screen sizes and resolutions, the KingKong X's 120Hz refresh rate delivers a noticeably smoother visual experience.
  • Battery: The KingKong X's massive 10200mAh battery dwarfs the A13's 5000mAh, translating to potentially two days or more of usage on a single charge.
  • Durability: While not explicitly stated in the specs, the "KingKong" moniker suggests the Cubot device is built for ruggedness and likely has enhanced durability features. The A13 is a standard smartphone with no specific ruggedization mentioned.
  • Camera: The KingKong X boasts higher megapixel counts on both front and rear cameras. However, real-world image quality will depend on sensor size, image processing, and other factors not fully detailed in the specs.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Samsung Galaxy A13: Best suited for budget-conscious users who prioritize basic communication, web browsing, and light media consumption. Its compact size and lighter weight make it more pocketable.
  • Cubot KingKong X: Ideal for power users, gamers, outdoor enthusiasts, and anyone who demands long battery life. Its rugged build and massive battery make it a reliable companion for demanding tasks and extended use.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  • What is your budget? The A13 is likely more affordable.
  • What is your primary use case? Basic tasks vs. demanding applications/gaming.
  • How important is battery life? The KingKong X offers exceptional longevity.

My Choice: As a tech journalist who often pushes devices to their limits, I would choose the Cubot KingKong X. The combination of a powerful processor, ample RAM and storage, a smooth 120Hz display, and an enormous battery aligns perfectly with my needs for productivity, content creation, and on-the-go use. While the larger size and weight might be a slight drawback, the performance benefits and incredible battery life far outweigh those considerations for my usage pattern. The A13, while a solid budget option, simply doesn't offer the horsepower or endurance I require.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.