Samsung Galaxy A13 5G vs ZTE Blade A75 4G - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date December 3, 2021 July 1, 2024
Release Year 2021 2024

Physical

Volume 110.74 cm³ 106.97 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.33 "/g 3.49 "/g
Weight 195 g 189 g
Height 164.5 mm 164.1 mm
Width 76.5 mm 75.8 mm
Thickness 8.8 mm 8.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • Basalt Black
  • Aqua Green
  • Marble White

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.6 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 720 x 1612
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 81.1 % 84.1 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 267 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 45.15 mAh/cm³ 46.74 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) Unisoc T606 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G57 MC2 Mali-G57 MP1

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 13
Maximum OS Version 14

Comparison Summary

Alright, let's dive deep into the Samsung Galaxy A13 5G and the ZTE Blade A75 4G. These two budget-friendly contenders have some interesting differences under the hood, and we're going to break down exactly what that means for you, the user.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A13 5GZTE Blade A75 4GReal-World Implications
Design
Launch Date2021-12-032024-07-01ZTE is significantly newer, potentially benefiting from newer tech and software.
Form FactorStandardStandardBoth are typical smartphones, not foldable or specialized.
Dimensions (mm)164.5 x 76.5 x 8.8164.1 x 75.8 x 8.6Both are similar in size, though the Galaxy A13 is a tad thicker.
Weight (g)195189The ZTE is slightly lighter, which may be preferable for extended use.
Display
Size6.5"6.6"Similar display sizes, a minor difference noticeable during side-by-side comparisons.
Resolution720x1600720x1612Both offer basic HD resolution; the difference is marginal.
PPI270267Similar pixel density; both have acceptable visual clarity.
TechnologyPLS LCDIPS LCDIPS LCD usually has better viewing angles and color reproduction compared to PLS LCD.
Refresh Rate90Hz90HzBoth offer a smoother scrolling experience than traditional 60Hz screens.
Brightness (nits)00Both have similar brightness.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm)Unisoc T606 (12 nm)Mediatek chip is more efficient and performs better, meaning smoother operation and better performance in demanding tasks.
AnTuTu Score389,300240,000A significant difference in performance. Galaxy A13 is noticeably faster in day-to-day use.
GPUMali-G57 MC2Mali-G57 MP1Galaxy A13's GPU has better graphical processing capabilities.
Battery Life
Capacity5000mAh5000mAhIdentical battery sizes, offering comparable usage time.
Charging15W Fast Charging22.5W Fast ChargingThe ZTE charges faster and has a more efficient battery chemistry (Li-Polymer).
FeaturesNon-removableNon-removableStandard design: batteries cannot be replaced by the user.
Camera
Standard50MP f/1.850MP f/1.8Similar primary camera specs on paper.
Selfie5MP f/1.98MPZTE has a better front camera on paper for higher-resolution selfies.
Portrait (Depth)2MPNoneGalaxy A13 has depth sensor for better portrait shots.
Macro Lens2MPNoneGalaxy A13 allows for close-up macro shots.
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fpsStandard video recording capabilities.
Features4K Video, Triple CameraDual Camera, Digital Image StabilizationGalaxy has an additional camera for macro and depth shots. ZTE has digital stabilization for better videos.
Software
OSAndroid 11Android 13ZTE offers a newer operating system out of the box, though with unknown upgrade status.
Connectivity
WiFi802.11ac802.11acSimilar WiFi standards. ZTE adds Dual Band & WiFi Display support.
Bluetooth5.0 LE5.0 LEBoth have basic Bluetooth features, the Samsung has additional profiles.
GPSGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, GalileoGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, GalileoStandard satellite positioning features.
SIMDual SIM Dual StandbyDual SIM Dual StandbyStandard Dual SIM support.
Storage
Internal64GB/128GB128GB/256GBZTE has a storage advantage with a larger max option.
RAM4GB4GB/8GBZTE has an option for a better 8GB of RAM, better for multitasking and gaming.
ExpandableNoNoNo SD Card support for either phone.
Audio
QualityBasic audio featuresDTS / DTS XZTE offers enhanced audio processing.
Security
FingerprintSide-mountedSide-mountedBoth offer similar fingerprint security.
Build Quality
Screen ProtectionGorilla Glass 3UnknownGalaxy A13's screen has better protection than the ZTE.
Sensors
SensorsFingerprint, Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Barometer, Ultrasonic Virtual ProximityFingerprint, Proximity, Accelerometer, GyroscopeGalaxy A13 has better sensor suite overall.

2. Key Insights

Samsung Galaxy A13 5G:

  • Performance Champ: The Dimensity 700 chipset provides a significant performance advantage, making it smoother and more responsive for daily tasks, gaming, and multitasking.
  • Established Ecosystem: As a Samsung device, it comes with the advantages of a more mature software ecosystem and likely better long-term software support.
  • Better Display Protection: With Gorilla Glass 3, the screen has superior scratch and damage protection.
  • Enhanced Sensor Array: Galaxy A13 is packed with a broader sensor suite to offer a fuller range of features and better performance.
  • Additional Camera Capabilities: Featuring a triple camera setup with a macro lens for detailed close-ups and depth sensing for enhanced portraits.

ZTE Blade A75 4G:

  • Newer Design & Software: Being a much newer phone, the A75 benefits from the latest software and more modern design.
  • Faster Charging: The 22.5W fast charging, combined with the Li-Polymer battery, is a great plus.
  • Larger Max Storage: A 256GB internal storage option for users who need more space for photos, videos, and apps.
  • Better Selfie Cam: An 8MP front-facing camera takes better self-portraits.
  • Enhanced Audio: The inclusion of DTS/DTS X audio processing provides enhanced surround sound and better audio quality overall.
  • Option for more RAM: With a potential option of 8GB RAM, multitasking and app performance are improved.

Trade-offs

  • Performance vs. Features: The Galaxy A13 5G wins in raw performance, while the ZTE A75 4G offers better charging, audio, more storage and, potentially more RAM.
  • Software: The ZTE has a newer OS version, but Samsung's history of software support is generally better.
  • Cameras: Both have 50MP main cameras, but the Galaxy has a dedicated depth sensor and a macro lens, while the ZTE has the better selfie cam.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

Samsung Galaxy A13 5G is best for:

  • Performance-focused users: Those who prioritize smooth multitasking, app loading, and moderate gaming.
  • Users who value screen protection: Those needing extra durability for everyday use and want a phone with known screen protection.
  • Samsung enthusiasts: Those who prefer the established ecosystem and reliable software support.
  • Camera versatility: Users who value the additional cameras for creative shots and better overall camera options.

ZTE Blade A75 4G is best for:

  • Budget-conscious users: Those who need to save money but still want a capable device with fast charging.
  • Media consumers: Those who prioritize enhanced audio quality and a good selfie cam.
  • Heavy storage users: Those who need a lot of onboard storage for media files and apps.
  • Newer Software: Users who want a modern out-of-the-box software experience.
  • Multitasking Enthusiasts: Users that need the option of higher RAM to handle multiple apps at once.

4. Buying Decision Framework

Here are three practical questions to help you decide:

  1. How much do you value performance?
    • If you need the smoothest performance and prefer a responsive phone, the Galaxy A13 5G is the better option.
  2. How important is fast charging and media consumption?
    • If quick recharges and good audio quality are a priority, the ZTE Blade A75 4G is the better choice.
  3. How much storage and RAM do you need?
    • If you want a lot of internal storage and more RAM, the ZTE is the better option.

Scenario-Based Recommendations

  • Budget Gamer: Go with the Galaxy A13 5G for better performance in games, though you may have to sacrifice in other areas such as audio, and charging.
  • Media Mogul: The ZTE Blade A75 4G with its faster charging and better audio should be your main focus.
  • Everyday User: The Galaxy A13 5G offers a balanced approach and a better user experience overall in this case.

Final Thoughts

Both the Samsung Galaxy A13 5G and the ZTE Blade A75 4G offer solid value within their respective spaces. The Galaxy A13 is the clear winner in raw performance and also offers a more rounded set of features, though at the expense of better charging and audio. On the other hand, the ZTE Blade A75 4G offers newer software, better charging, enhanced audio, and a bigger selfie cam, which may be more compelling for different types of users.

My Choice

If I were choosing between the two, I would personally lean towards the Samsung Galaxy A13 5G. While the ZTE A75 has the advantage of being newer with faster charging and some audio improvements, the Mediatek Dimensity 700 chipset in the Galaxy A13 is a significant win for overall performance, which, in my book, is key. As an enthusiast and tech writer, I value that extra bit of oomph for everyday tasks, gaming, and general responsiveness. Plus, the Gorilla Glass 3 on the Galaxy A13 gives me peace of mind and the better sensor suite overall gives me a fuller experience overall. Though the storage is smaller and the charging slower, the better performance overall and the more rounded feature set seals the deal for me!

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.