Samsung Galaxy A13 5G vs Motorola Razr 40 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Motorola Razr 40
Motorola Razr 40
Motorola

General

Launch Date December 3, 2021 June 21, 2023
Release Year 2021 2023

Physical

Volume 110.74 cm³ 93.53 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.33 "/g 3.66 "/g
Weight 195 g 188.6 g
Height 164.5 mm 170.8 mm
Width 76.5 mm 74 mm
Thickness 8.8 mm 7.4 mm
Foldable Design No Yes
Available Colors
  • Black
  • Sage Green
  • Vanilla Cream
  • Summer Lilac
  • Grape Compote
  • Cherry Blossom

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.9 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 1080 x 2640
Aspect Ratio 20:9 22:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 81.1 % 85.2 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 413 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 144 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 1400 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 88.22 mAh/in²
Battery Density 45.15 mAh/cm³ 44.91 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 4200 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) Qualcomm SM7450-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.36 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Mali-G57 MC2 Adreno 644

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 13
Maximum OS Version 14 16

Comparison Summary

Okay, let's dive into a detailed comparison of the Samsung Galaxy A13 5G and the Motorola Razr 40. I'll break down the specs, highlight the key differences, and help you decide which phone might be the better fit for your needs.

1. Specifications Breakdown

Here's a detailed table comparing the key specifications of both phones, along with real-world implications:

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A13 5GMotorola Razr 40Real-World Implications
Design
Form FactorStandardFoldableRazr 40 is a unique, pocketable device; A13 5G is a traditional phone
Dimensions164.5 x 76.5 x 8.8 mm170.8 x 74 x 7.4 mmRazr 40 is taller but thinner; A13 5G is wider and thicker; Razr 40 is more pocketable when folded
Weight195g188.6gRazr 40 is slightly lighter, noticeable over long periods
Display
Size6.5"6.9"Razr 40 offers a larger viewing area
Resolution720 x 16001080 x 2640Razr 40 has significantly sharper visuals
PPI270413Razr 40's text and images will appear much crisper and clearer
TechnologyPLS LCD--
Refresh Rate90Hz144HzRazr 40 has smoother scrolling and animations
Brightness0 nits1400 nitsRazr 40 will be much more visible in bright sunlight
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 700 (7nm)Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4nm)Razr 40 has significantly faster processing, quicker app loading times and better overall performance
AnTuTu Score389,300699,600Razr 40 will handle multitasking and gaming much better
GPUMali-G57 MC2Adreno 644Razr 40 has better graphics rendering
Camera
Main Camera50MP (f/1.8)64MP (f/1.8)Razr 40 captures more detailed photos (higher resolution)
Selfie Camera5MP (f/1.9)32MP (f/2.45)Razr 40 will take higher quality and more detailed selfies
Portrait Camera2MP (f/2.4)NoneA13 5G has dedicated depth sensor
Macro Camera2MP (f/2.4)NoneA13 5G has a dedicated macro lens
Wide Angle + MacroNone13MP (f/2.2)Razr 40 provides a wide angle and macro camera
Video1080p@30fps4K@30fps, 1080p@60fpsRazr 40 can record higher resolution videos and higher frame rate
Video StabilizationNoYes, EISRazr 40 is better for recording smoother videos
Slow-motionNo, 30 fpsYes, 120 fpsRazr 40 offers slow-motion capabilities
Camera FeaturesSomeMoreRazr 40 has advanced features, OIS, laser autofocus
Battery Life
Capacity5000mAh4200mAhA13 5G has a larger battery, potentially lasting longer
Charging15W Fast Charging33W Fast ChargingRazr 40 charges much faster, despite the smaller battery
Battery FeaturesNon-removableReverse charging, Wireless 8W, Non-removableRazr 40 has wireless and reverse charging
Software
OSAndroid 11, Upgradable to 14Android 13, Upgradable to 16Razr 40 has a more recent and upgradable OS
Connectivity
WiFi802.11 a/b/g/n/ac802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/axRazr 40 supports WiFi 6, providing faster speed and a better connection
Bluetooth5.0 LE5.3 LERazr 40 supports newer Bluetooth technology
GPSGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, GalileoGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, SUPL, GalileoBoth phones provide similar location functionalities
SIMDual SIM Dual Standby (Nano SIM + Nano SIM)Dual SIM Dual Standby (Nano SIM + Nano SIM / eSIM)Razr 40 supports eSIM in addition to Dual SIM
Storage
Internal64 GB or 128 GB128 GB or 256 GBRazr 40 has more storage options
RAM4GB8GB or 12 GBRazr 40 handles heavy multitasking
ExpandableNoNoNeither phone offers expandable storage options
Audio
QualityBasic audio featuresDolby Atmos, Stereo Speakers, 3 microphonesRazr 40 has enhanced audio experience
Security
Featuresside-mounted fingerprint sensorside-mounted fingerprint sensorBoth phones have basic biometric security
Build Quality
ProtectionCorning Gorilla Glass 3Corning Gorilla Glass VictusRazr 40 offers better screen protection
Sensors
SensorsBiometric: Fingerprint; Motion: Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope; Environmental: Barometer; Proximity: Ultrasonic proximity virtualBiometric: Fingerprint; Proximity: Proximity; Motion: Accelerometer, Compass, GyroscopeA13 5G offers more sensors including the Barometer

2. Key Insights

Samsung Galaxy A13 5G:

  • Strengths: The A13 5G's main advantage is its larger 5000 mAh battery, potentially offering longer battery life compared to the Razr 40. It also includes a few extra camera lenses, like a dedicated macro lens, as well as more sensor options including a barometer which some users may find important. Its lower price point makes it a more accessible option for budget-conscious users.
  • User Experience: The A13 5G offers a reliable, if basic, smartphone experience. The 90Hz screen is okay for smooth scrolling, but isn't as crisp as that on the Razr 40. The camera setup, while versatile, lags behind in image quality and video resolution. The build is decent with a solid screen protection rating for the price point, and you'll get through a full day of average usage.
  • Trade-offs: The major drawback of the A13 5G is its underpowered chipset, which leads to slower performance than the Razr 40. It doesn't offer cutting-edge features, has average display resolution, and doesn't provide outstanding camera or audio capabilities.

Motorola Razr 40:

  • Strengths: The Razr 40’s primary appeal is its foldable design, making it highly pocketable and unique. It boasts a much faster processor, a significantly sharper and brighter display with a high refresh rate and better video resolution and a much higher resolution selfie camera. The Razr 40 also offers advanced features like fast charging, wireless charging, and a more feature-rich camera setup, including video stabilization and Dolby Atmos audio.
  • User Experience: The Razr 40 delivers a premium and smoother experience. Its high refresh rate makes scrolling feel very fluid. The camera is more versatile and takes much better-quality photos and videos. Its foldable form-factor provides more interactive user experiences and convenient form factor. Its better chipset allows for multitasking and gaming with better performance than the A13 5G.
  • Trade-offs: The Razr 40 does sacrifice battery capacity (4200mAh) for its slim form factor and additional features like wireless charging and reverse charging, which might require more frequent charging cycles, although its much faster charging speeds mitigate this. It also does not have a depth sensor for enhanced portrait mode, or a dedicated macro lens, and is also a much more expensive option.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

Samsung Galaxy A13 5G is best suited for:

  • Budget-conscious users: Those who prioritize affordability above all else.
  • Users who need long battery life: People who spend a lot of time away from a charger.
  • Users who don't require cutting-edge performance: Individuals who primarily use their phones for basic tasks like browsing, social media, and calls.
  • Users who prefer larger traditional phones: Individuals who don't want a foldable phone.

Use Cases:

  • Daily driver for basic tasks
  • Backup phone
  • First smartphone for younger individuals or the elderly

Motorola Razr 40 is best suited for:

  • Tech enthusiasts: Users who appreciate innovative and stylish designs and want a phone that turns heads.
  • Users who value performance and display quality: Those who enjoy smooth animations, vibrant visuals, and fast app loading.
  • Users who need strong camera capabilities: People who frequently capture high-quality photos and videos.
  • Users who want a premium smartphone experience: Individuals who prioritize cutting-edge features and advanced tech.

Use Cases:

  • Primary driver for daily heavy usage, multitasking, and gaming
  • On-the-go media consumption, especially for streaming and video
  • Photography and videography

4. Buying Decision Framework

Here are three practical questions to help you decide:

  1. Budget: Are you looking for the most affordable option or are you willing to invest more for a premium experience?
  2. Form Factor and Design: Do you prefer a standard smartphone, or are you interested in the uniqueness and compactness of a foldable?
  3. Performance and Battery: Are you willing to sacrifice some battery life for better performance and a better camera, or do you prioritize long battery life and are ok with basic performance?

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: Budget is the main priority: Choose the Samsung Galaxy A13 5G. It offers a basic but reliable experience at a lower cost, focusing on battery life and daily usability.

  • Scenario 2: Desire for the best experience, budget is not as much of a concern: Choose the Motorola Razr 40. The premium experience offered by the faster processor, high refresh rate display and better cameras, combined with its unique foldable design, make it an excellent high-end option.

  • Scenario 3: You want a great blend of price and performance: This is where things become tricky, and in my opinion, neither of these phones fits this scenario, as the A13 is lacking too much, and the Razr 40 is definitely not a mid-range phone, but rather a high end device. It is more important to clarify whether budget is more important, or if performance is more important. If it is the budget, then get the A13 5G, and if it is performance then the Razr 40 is the clear winner.

My Choice

If I were choosing between these two devices, I would choose the Motorola Razr 40. While the Samsung A13 5G is a great budget phone with long battery life, the Razr 40 offers so much more in terms of user experience and cutting edge technology. The foldable design, the high-refresh rate display, the superior processing power, and the more advanced camera system make it worth the extra investment for me. As a tech journalist, I appreciate innovation, and the Razr 40 delivers in spades. The ability to get better pictures, videos, a much smoother display, with significantly better performance is why I'd pick the Razr 40 even with it's higher price tag.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.