1. Specifications Comparison
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A12 | ZTE Blade A75 4G | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design | |||
| Dimensions | 164 x 75.8 x 8.9 mm | 164.1 x 75.8 x 8.6 mm | Similar size, ZTE slightly thinner (0.3mm). Negligible difference in daily use. |
| Weight | 205g | 189g | ZTE is 16g lighter, noticeable for extended use. |
| Display | |||
| Size | 6.5" | 6.6" | Very similar screen sizes, negligible difference for most users. |
| Resolution | 720x1600 | 720x1612 | Very similar resolution, both are HD+ displays. Slight difference won't be noticeable. |
| PPI | 270 | 267 | Nearly identical pixel density; both have decent sharpness for everyday use. |
| Technology | PLS LCD | IPS LCD | IPS LCD generally offers better viewing angles and color accuracy compared to PLS LCD. |
| Refresh Rate | 60Hz | 90Hz | 90Hz display on the ZTE offers smoother animations and scrolling, more fluid user experience. |
| Brightness | 0 nits | 0 nits | No information available for peak brightness; cannot comment on outdoor visibility. |
| Performance | |||
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12 nm) | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) | Different chipsets with the Unisoc T606 offering significantly more performance. |
| AnTuTu Score | 103,000 | 240,000 | ZTE offers 133% higher benchmark score suggesting much better responsiveness and multitasking ability. |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Mali-G57 MP1 | Mali-G57 is generally superior, expect better gaming performance on ZTE. |
| Camera | |||
| Main Camera | 48MP, f/2.0 | 50MP, f/1.8 | ZTE has slightly higher resolution and a wider aperture for better low-light performance. |
| Selfie Camera | 8MP, f/2.2 | 8MP | Both offer comparable selfie quality. |
| Telephoto Lens | 2MP, f/2.4 | Not Available | Samsung A12 has a dedicated telephoto lens, allowing optical zoom. |
| Wide Angle Lens | 5MP, f/2.2 | Not Available | Samsung A12 has a dedicated wide-angle lens, allowing more scene capture. |
| Depth Sensor | 2MP, f/2.4 | Not Available | Samsung A12 has a dedicated depth sensor for portrait mode. |
| Video Recording | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps | Both offer similar video quality for standard social media sharing. |
| DXOMark Score | 90 (Mobile) | Not Available | Samsung A12 has a tested DXOMark score, but no specifics on photo or video scores, meaning the overall score doesn't give much info. |
| Camera Features | Quadruple camera, Digital zoom, Autofocus, etc. | Dual camera, Digital zoom, Digital Image Stabilization, PDAF, etc. | Samsung has more lenses, ZTE has image stabilization and faster autofocus. |
| Battery | |||
| Capacity | 5000mAh | 5000mAh | Identical battery capacity means similar battery life for typical use. |
| Charging | 15W Fast Charging | 22.5W Fast Charging | ZTE charges significantly faster, reducing downtime. |
| Battery Type | Li-Ion | Li-Polymer | Li-Polymer is generally more durable, stable and may last more charge cycles |
| Removable | Non-removable | Non-removable | Neither battery is user-replaceable. |
| Software | |||
| OS | Android 10 (upgradable to 12) | Android 13 | ZTE runs newer Android version out of the box. |
| Connectivity | |||
| Wi-Fi | 802.11a/b/g/n, Dual band, Hotspot, Direct | 802.11a/b/g/n/ac, Dual band, Hotspot, Direct, Wi-Fi Display | ZTE supports faster Wi-Fi standards and Wi-Fi display. |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.0 LE | Both support Bluetooth 5.0. Samsung A12 has more Bluetooth profile support, while ZTE uses low-energy version. |
| GPS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo | ZTE supports more satellite systems leading to higher accuracy. |
| SIM | Dual SIM (Nano) | Dual SIM (Nano) | Both offer dual SIM functionality for using two numbers. |
| Storage | |||
| Internal | 32/64/128 GB | 128/256 GB | ZTE has 128GB more storage on base model. |
| RAM | 3/4/6 GB | 4/8 GB | ZTE has higher max RAM, improving multitasking. |
| Expandable | Not Expandable | Not Expandable | Neither supports external memory cards, impacting user's ability to store large amounts of media. |
| Audio | |||
| Quality | Basic Audio Features | DTS/DTS X | ZTE has better audio processing for a slightly better sound experience. |
| Security | |||
| Features | Side-mounted fingerprint | Side-mounted fingerprint | Both have the same style of fingerprint scanner. |
| Build Quality | |||
| Screen Protection | Unknown | Unknown | Lack of information; unable to compare screen protection. |
| Sensors | |||
| Sensors | Fingerprint, Proximity, Accelerometer | Fingerprint, Proximity, Accelerometer, Gyroscope | ZTE has a gyroscope, enabling more accurate motion sensing for gaming or VR. |
2. Key Differences Analysis
Samsung Galaxy A12 Advantages:
- More Camera versatility: The inclusion of dedicated telephoto, wide-angle, and depth sensors provides more creative options for photography.
- Established Brand: More reliable brand that is more common.
ZTE Blade A75 4G Advantages:
- Significantly Better Performance: The Unisoc T606 chipset and higher AnTuTu score result in snappier performance and better multitasking.
- Smoother Display: The 90Hz refresh rate makes for a smoother, more enjoyable user experience when navigating menus and scrolling.
- Faster Charging: The 22.5W fast charging is a practical advantage, getting you back up to 100% battery faster.
- More RAM and Storage: base storage of 128GB and up to 8GB RAM offer great value.
- Newer Android: Comes with Android 13, meaning it will have longer support and features.
- Enhanced Audio: DTS/DTS X improves the audio experience for music and videos.
Significant Trade-offs:
- The Samsung Galaxy A12 has more camera lenses but the ZTE A75 has a higher resolution and better aperture on the primary lens.
- The Samsung Galaxy A12 offers more Bluetooth profile support, while the ZTE offers low-energy version support.
3. User Profiles & Recommendations
Samsung Galaxy A12:
- Ideal Users: Users who are on a tight budget but want a more versatile camera setup.
- Use Cases:
- Casual photography with different perspectives (wide-angle, telephoto)
- Users familiar with the Samsung ecosystem
- Basic day-to-day use such as browsing, social media, calls
ZTE Blade A75 4G:
- Ideal Users: Users who prioritize performance, a smoother display, and faster charging on a budget.
- Use Cases:
- Gaming on a budget, for smoother performance
- Media consumption with better audio
- Users who want snappy performance and multitasking ability
- Users who prioritize fast charging
- Price-to-Value Ratio: The ZTE Blade A75 4G offers excellent value, given its better performance, display, and faster charging.
4. Decision Framework
Key Questions for Buyers:
- Performance vs. Camera Versatility: Do you prioritize overall performance and smoothness, or a versatile set of cameras?
- Fast Charging vs. Brand Loyalty: Is faster charging important to you, or would you prefer to go with a trusted brand like Samsung?
- Budget: Are you on a very tight budget, or do you have room to invest in the higher performing ZTE device?
Scenario-Based Recommendations:
- Scenario 1: If you want better camera versatility on a very tight budget, and you are familiar with Samsung products, the Samsung Galaxy A12 is an acceptable pick.
- Scenario 2: If you prioritize a smoother experience, better performance and faster charging within a budget, the ZTE Blade A75 4G is the better pick.
- Scenario 3: If budget is not as much of a constraint, you should consider other devices in a higher price bracket
Final Recommendation:
I would choose the ZTE Blade A75 4G. While the Samsung Galaxy A12 has a more versatile camera setup with its additional lenses, the ZTE Blade A75 4G offers a more well-rounded user experience. The significantly better performance, smoother 90Hz display, faster charging, and the enhanced audio make it a much more compelling option for daily use. The newer version of Android and the base 128GB of storage are also a big plus. The ZTE's main camera, although not as versatile, still manages to have a higher aperture and resolution, and with the addition of digital image stabilization and PDAF, it is a far better package.
