Samsung Galaxy A12 vs vivo X100 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
vivo X100
vivo X100
Vivo

General

Launch Date December 21, 2020 November 21, 2023
Release Year 2020 2023

Physical

Volume 110.64 cm³ 104.89 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.17 "/g 3.36 "/g
Weight 205 g 202 g
Height 164 mm 164.1 mm
Width 75.8 mm 75.2 mm
Thickness 8.9 mm 8.5 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • Red
  • Blue
  • White
  • White
  • Orange
  • Startrail Blue
  • Asteroid Black

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.78 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 1260 x 2800
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82.1 % 89.9 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 452 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 3000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 108.77 mAh/in²
Battery Density 45.19 mAh/cm³ 47.67 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 9300 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.35 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) Octa-core (1x3.25 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720)
GPU PowerVR GE8320 Immortalis-G720 MC12

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 10 14
Maximum OS Version 12

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

Here's a detailed comparison of the Samsung Galaxy A12 and vivo X100 specifications, focusing on their practical implications:

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A12vivo X100Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions164 × 75.8 × 8.9 mm164.1 × 75.2 × 8.5 mmSimilar size, A12 is slightly thicker. X100 might feel slightly slimmer and easier to hold
Weight205g202gVirtually identical weight, negligible difference in hand.
Display
Size6.5"6.78"vivo X100 has a slightly larger screen, offering a more immersive viewing experience.
Resolution720x16001260x2800vivo X100's higher resolution results in a noticeably sharper and clearer display, better for reading, viewing images and videos.
Pixel Density (PPI)270452vivo X100's higher pixel density provides a much crisper image, text looks sharper, and overall visuals are more detailed.
TechnologyPLS LCDAMOLEDvivo X100's AMOLED offers deeper blacks, better contrast, and more vibrant colors compared to the A12's LCD. Better for viewing media and content creation.
Refresh Rate60Hz120Hzvivo X100 has smoother scrolling and animations, leading to a more fluid user experience. Better for gaming and fast-paced content viewing
Brightness0 nits3000 nitsvivo X100 is vastly superior in outdoor visibility, much better readability under direct sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12 nm)Mediatek Dimensity 9300 (4 nm)vivo X100 has a much faster, more efficient processor, enabling smoother multitasking, faster app loading, and better gaming performance.
AnTuTu Score103,0001,881,325The vivo X100 has dramatically superior performance; much faster in all aspects from gaming to everyday tasks.
GPUPowerVR GE8320Immortalis-G720 MC12vivo X100 has a significantly more powerful GPU, resulting in higher graphical fidelity in games and better rendering performance.
Camera
Main Camera48MP, f/2.0, 1/2", 0.8µm50MP, f/1.57, 1/1.31", 1.2µmvivo X100 has a higher resolution, wider aperture, and larger sensor allowing it to capture more light, resulting in better low-light performance, and potentially more detail.
Selfie Camera8MP, f/2.232MP, f/2.0, 1/2.8", 0.8µmvivo X100 has a much higher resolution selfie camera, offering significantly better quality, and wider aperture for better low light and bokeh effects.
Telephoto Lens2MP, f/2.464MP, f/2.6, 1/2", 0.7µmvivo X100 offers vastly superior telephoto capability, providing much more detailed zoom shots.
Wide Angle Lens5MP, f/2.250MP, f/2.0, 1/2.76", 0.64µmvivo X100 has a much higher resolution wide-angle lens for capturing more detailed and expansive shots, also with a wider aperture for better light capture.
Portrait Mode (Depth)2MP, f/2.4NoneSamsung A12 has a dedicated depth sensor for better bokeh effects, but the overall image quality is much lower than the vivo X100
Video Recording1080p@30fps, No stabilization, No Slow-motionYes, Stabilization, 960fps Slow-motionvivo X100 records in higher resolution, features stabilization, and offers much higher frame-rate slow-motion for professional-looking videos.
DxOMark Mobile Score90 (Photo 0, Video 0)N/AA12's camera performance is basic, while X100 has not been tested but expected to be significantly better.
Camera FeaturesBasic setAdvanced set incl. Cinematic, 4K, OIS, Gimbal, RAWvivo X100 has many more advanced features; suitable for enthusiasts wanting better flexibility.
Battery
Capacity5000mAh5000mAhBoth phones have similar battery capacities, suggesting comparable battery life under similar use.
Charging15W120Wvivo X100 charges significantly faster reducing charging time, much more convenient for those on the go.
Software
OSAndroid 10, max 12Android 14vivo X100 runs on a newer version of Android providing a better user experience and access to new features.
Connectivity
Wi-Fi802.11a/b/g/n802.11a/b/g/n/ac/ax/bevivo X100 supports newer Wi-Fi standards (Wi-Fi 7), offers faster speeds, lower latency, and better performance.
Bluetooth5.05.4 LEvivo X100 has a newer Bluetooth standard, offering better speed, more reliability and more efficient power management.
GPSGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, BeidouGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, QZSS, Galileo, L1+L5, B1, E1+E5a, B2, NavICvivo X100 supports more satellite systems for better positioning and location accuracy.
SIMDual SIM Dual StandbyDual SIM Dual StandbyBoth support Dual SIM
Storage
Internal32/64/128 GB256/512/1024 GBvivo X100 offers significantly more storage, better for those who have a large media collection, or install large apps.
RAM3/4/6 GB12/16 GBvivo X100 has significantly more RAM; provides better multitasking, and better app performance.
ExpandableNoNoNeither of the devices supports expandable storage
Audio
QualityBasicDolby Atmos, Hi-Res Audio, Stereo Speakersvivo X100 provides a superior audio experience with better spatial audio, audio quality and better immersion.
Security
Featuresside-mounted fingerprintbasic fingerprint sensorSamsung A12 provides a more advanced fingerprint sensor; Provides basic biometric security
Build Quality
ProtectionUnknownUnknownBoth are using the same screen protection technology.
Sensors
SensorsFingerprint, Proximity, AccelerometerFingerprint, Proximity, Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscopevivo X100 has a more comprehensive sensor suite, enabling better navigation, VR and AR experiences and better gaming experiences.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Here are the major advantages of each phone, with their practical implications:

Samsung Galaxy A12 Advantages:

  • Slightly More Advanced Fingerprint Sensor: side mounted fingerprint sensor might be more convenient for some users.
  • Dedicated Depth Sensor: The dedicated depth sensor on the main camera could produce a somewhat better bokeh effect in portrait shots, however, the overall quality and versatility of the vivo X100 cameras is unmatched.
  • Lower Cost: Given its older technology and lower specifications it's likely to be significantly more affordable.

Practical Implications for A12:

  • Best suited for very basic use, and for users not concerned about processing performance, or camera quality.

vivo X100 Advantages:

  • Significantly Superior Display: Larger, sharper AMOLED screen with higher refresh rate and brightness provides a premium viewing experience, greatly enhancing media consumption and user experience.
  • Dramatically Superior Performance: Much faster chipset and GPU result in smoother multitasking, faster app loading, and greatly enhanced gaming performance.
  • Significantly Better Cameras: Higher resolution, larger sensors, wider apertures, and more features result in much better photo and video quality in a variety of lighting conditions, vastly outperforming the A12.
  • Much Faster Charging: 120W charging drastically reduces charging time, providing far more convenience and less downtime.
  • Newer Software: Android 14 offers a better user experience, with access to the latest features and security updates.
  • Better Connectivity: Wi-Fi 7 and Bluetooth 5.4 offer faster, more reliable, and more efficient wireless connections.
  • Significantly More Storage and RAM: Larger capacity storage and RAM allow more space for media and apps, and better multitasking capabilities.
  • Superior Audio: Dolby Atmos, Hi-Res Audio, and Stereo Speakers provide a vastly better audio experience compared to the basic audio of the A12.
  • Comprehensive Sensor Suite: Gyroscope and compass for better navigation and gaming.

Practical Implications for X100:

  • Ideal for users who want great display, premium processing power, great camera performance, fast charging, and modern connectivity.

Trade-offs:

  • The A12 might offer a slightly more basic portrait mode (due to its dedicated depth sensor), however the overall camera and video quality of the X100 are unmatched
  • Price: The vivo X100 is expected to be significantly more expensive than the A12, due to its high end specifications and premium features.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Samsung Galaxy A12:

  • Ideal User:
    • Users with very basic smartphone needs, such as calls, texting, very light social media, and simple browsing.
    • Budget-conscious individuals who prioritize affordability over high-end features.
    • Users who are not concerned about gaming, and have very basic camera needs.
  • Use Cases:
    • Primary phone for a child or elderly person with very limited needs.
    • Backup phone for emergencies.
    • A basic secondary phone for basic tasks and calls.
  • Price-to-Value:
    • Likely to be the better value in terms of initial cost, but it would have a significantly lower feature-to-price value due to its lack of features and performance limitations.

vivo X100:

  • Ideal User:
    • Users who value premium performance, high-quality display, great camera capabilities, and fast charging.
    • Mobile gamers who need a powerful and responsive phone.
    • Photography enthusiasts who want advanced camera features and superior image quality.
    • Users who consume a lot of media.
  • Use Cases:
    • Daily driver for tech-savvy individuals.
    • Professional photographers who need a high-quality camera on the go.
    • Mobile gaming enthusiasts.
    • Media creators and consumers, who watch lots of movies/tv.
  • Price-to-Value:
    • Offers excellent value for the price, due to its many advanced features, high performance, and great camera.
    • Offers high future proofing due to its high-end hardware specifications.

4. Decision Framework

Here are three key questions to guide a purchase decision:

  1. What is my budget?
    • If budget is the primary constraint, the A12 is the only option.
    • If budget is flexible and one prioritizes features, the X100 is a better option
  2. What are my primary use cases?
    • For very basic needs (calls, texts, very light browsing), A12 is sufficient.
    • For gaming, media consumption, and photography, the X100 is vastly superior.
  3. How important are display quality and camera performance?
    • If these are not important, the A12 is sufficient.
    • If these are important, the X100 is far better, and should be chosen.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: A user needs a very basic phone for calls and texts and has a very limited budget, the A12 is a viable option.
  • Scenario 2: A user wants a phone with a great display, fast performance, good camera, and is not concerned about the budget, the X100 is clearly the better option.
  • Scenario 3: A user is somewhere in the middle, and does not have the budget for a high-end phone like the X100, but is willing to spend more than the price of the A12, they should consider a midrange option.

What I would choose and why!

If I had to choose between these two phones, I would definitively choose the vivo X100.

Here's why:

  • Superior Overall Experience: The X100 offers a vastly superior experience in almost every aspect. The display is a significant step up, providing much sharper visuals, more vibrant colors, and smoother motion.
  • Performance is King: The processing power difference is night and day. I use my phone for a variety of tasks, including browsing, social media, light gaming, media consumption, and some photography, the X100's performance would enable a much smoother and more enjoyable experience.
  • Camera Versatility and Quality: I enjoy taking photos and the significant improvements in camera resolution, sensor size, and the inclusion of features such as OIS, stabilization, and optical zoom in the X100 would be game-changers.
  • Future-Proofing: With a much faster processor, advanced connectivity, and plenty of RAM and storage, the vivo X100 would be a lot more future proof.
  • Fast Charging: As someone who is always on the go, the 120W charging feature of the X100 would be very important in my decision process.

While the Samsung Galaxy A12 may be sufficient for some users with very basic needs and a tight budget, the drastic performance difference, superior display, vastly better camera, and overall improved user experience of the vivo X100 make it the clear winner in this comparison for me. The initial cost of the X100 is certainly higher, but the value proposition is much higher given the feature set.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.