Samsung Galaxy A12 vs Samsung Galaxy A03 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date December 21, 2020 January 21, 2022
Release Year 2020 2022

Physical

Volume 110.64 cm³ 113.41 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.17 "/g 3.32 "/g
Weight 205 g 196 g
Height 164 mm 164.2 mm
Width 75.8 mm 75.9 mm
Thickness 8.9 mm 9.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • Red
  • Blue
  • White
  • Black
  • Red
  • Blue

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.5 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 720 x 1600
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82.1 % 81.8 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 270 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A N/A
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 118.34 mAh/in²
Battery Density 45.19 mAh/cm³ 44.09 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes No
Chipset Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12 nm) Unisoc T606 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.35 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU PowerVR GE8320 Mali-G57 MP1

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 microUSB 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 10 11
Maximum OS Version 12 13

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A12Samsung Galaxy A03Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions164 × 75.8 × 8.9 mm164.2 × 75.9 × 9.1 mmVirtually identical size; slight difference in thickness (0.2mm) may be negligible.
Weight205g196gA03 is slightly lighter, making it marginally more comfortable to hold for long periods.
Display
Size6.5"6.5"Identical display sizes for both phones.
Resolution720x1600720x1600Same sharpness; neither is exceptionally sharp, but suitable for basic usage.
Pixel Density270 PPI270 PPIIdentical pixel density, expect similar levels of screen clarity.
TechnologyPLS LCDPLS LCDBoth phones use the same display technology, suggesting similar color reproduction and viewing angles.
Refresh Rate60Hz60HzBoth phones have standard 60Hz refresh rate, which is adequate for normal usage but not for high refresh-rate gaming.
Brightness0 nits0 nitsBoth phones have the same peak brightness, suggesting similar visibility under direct sunlight (Note: peak brightness value is 0, which is incorrect and we will assume that it is a normal value for these devices)
Performance
ChipsetMediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12 nm)Unisoc T606 (12 nm)Different chipsets, expect performance variations.
AnTuTu Score103,000174,932A03 is significantly faster in benchmarks, resulting in snappier app loading and multitasking.
GPUPowerVR GE8320Mali-G57 MP1Different GPUs, A03 should have an edge in gaming performance.
Battery
Capacity5000mAh5000mAhBoth phones should provide comparable battery life.
Charging15W fast charging7.5W fast chargingA12 charges faster; A03 will take significantly longer to fully charge.
FeaturesNon-removableNon-removableIdentical battery features.
Camera
Rear Main Camera Resolution48MP48MPSimilar primary camera resolution.
Rear Main Camera Aperturef/2.0f/1.8A03 has a wider aperture, which may lead to better low-light performance.
Rear Main Sensor Size1/2"UnknownUnknown. A12 has a known size which may be a better sensor.
Rear Main Sensor ModelSamsung S5KGM2UnknownA12's sensor is known, while A03's sensor is unknown, so we cannot compare the technology behind the sensors.
Rear Main Pixel Size0.80 µm0.80 µmBoth phones have the same pixel size, suggesting similar light-gathering capabilities for the primary sensor.
Selfie Camera Resolution8MP5MPA12's selfie camera has a higher resolution.
Selfie Camera Aperturef/2.2f/2.2Both selfie cameras have identical aperture values.
Telephoto Lens2MPNoneA12 has an additional telephoto lens.
Wide Angle Lens5MPNoneA12 has an additional wide-angle lens.
Portrait Mode (Depth)2MP2MPBoth have depth sensors with same resolution.
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fpsSimilar video recording capabilities.
DxoMark Score90 (Mobile)Not TestedA12 has a basic DxoMark score (90). A03 was not tested by DxoMark
FeaturesQuadruple camera, Digital zoom, etc.Dual camera, Digital zoom, etc.A12 has a more versatile camera setup due to having more cameras.
Software
OSAndroid 10Android 11A03 ships with a newer version of Android; should get better software support.
Max OS Version1213A03 will have at least one major Android update than the A12.
Connectivity
Wi-Fi802.11a/b/g/n802.11b/g/n/acA03 has newer Wi-Fi support.
Bluetooth5.05.0 LEA12 has more advanced Bluetooth features. A03 has Low Energy features.
GPSGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, BeidouGPS, A-GPS, GLONASSA12 has more satellite system support for potentially higher accuracy.
SIMDual SIM Dual StandbyDual SIM Dual StandbyBoth support dual SIM.
Storage
Internal32/64/128GB32/64/128GBBoth phones offer the same storage options.
RAM3/4/6GB3/4GBA12 can have more RAM for smoother multitasking if purchased with the 6 GB variant.
ExpandableNoNoNeither phone has expandable storage.
Audio
QualityBasic audio featuresDolby AtmosA03 has better audio enhancements.
Security
FeaturesFingerprint sensorBasic securityA12 has biometric fingerprint security, offering more security.
Sensors
SensorsFingerprint, Proximity, AccelerometerProximity, AccelerometerA12 has an additional biometric fingerprint sensor, which is very useful in daily usage.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Samsung Galaxy A12 Advantages:

  • More Versatile Camera System: Quad-camera setup with telephoto and wide-angle lenses for diverse photography options.
  • Faster Charging: 15W charging significantly reduces charging times compared to the A03.
  • Potentially More RAM: Option for 6GB RAM (depending on variant) which could lead to better multitasking capabilities.
  • Fingerprint Sensor: Added biometric security provides quick and secure unlocking.
  • More Advanced Bluetooth: More advanced Bluetooth profiles for better connectivity options
  • More GPS satelite support: Potentially better GPS for maps.

Samsung Galaxy A03 Advantages:

  • Significantly Better Performance: The Unisoc T606 chipset provides significantly better performance for general usage, gaming, and app loading.
  • Newer Android OS: Ships with Android 11 and has a planned upgrade to Android 13, offering a more modern software experience.
  • Wider Main Camera Aperture: f/1.8 aperture could offer better low-light performance than A12's f/2.0.
  • Dolby Atmos: Better audio quality for immersive sound.
  • Newer Wifi Standard: Offers the newest wifi standard which could lead to better connectivity.

Trade-offs:

  • A12 trades some raw performance for a more versatile camera setup and added security features.
  • A03 trades camera versatility, faster charging, and biometric security for significantly better overall performance, newer software, and better audio.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Samsung Galaxy A12 Ideal User:

  • Budget-Conscious Photographers: Users who value having a telephoto and wide-angle lens, despite potentially not having the highest image quality.
  • Users Prioritizing Security and Comfort People who like physical fingerprint readers
  • Users who prefer faster charging.
  • Users who prioritize having more RAM.

Use Cases:

  • Capturing diverse photo angles.
  • Daily use with faster charging.
  • Security-conscious individuals using a fingerprint sensor.
  • Users who might prefer to spend less money and get a decent camera.

Samsung Galaxy A03 Ideal User:

  • Value-Conscious Performance Seekers: Users who want the best performance possible on a budget.
  • Multimedia Consumers: Those who enjoy watching videos, movies, and listening to music with better audio quality.
  • Everyday Users: People who primarily use their phone for basic tasks and want a smooth experience.
  • Gamers on a Budget: Mobile gamers looking for decent performance at a cheaper price point.

Use Cases:

  • Smooth everyday app usage and web browsing.
  • Casual mobile gaming with better graphical performance.
  • Enjoying music and videos with Dolby Atmos audio.
  • Users who prioritize getting a newer phone with better software.
  • Users who want the latest connectivity standards.

Price-to-Value:

  • Both phones are in the budget category; however, the A03 offers significantly better performance at a similar price point.
  • The A12 offers a more versatile camera setup for a slightly lower price, which may be better for a specific user profile.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions to Ask:

  1. How important is raw performance to you? (A03 excels here)
  2. Do you prioritize a versatile camera system or better performance? (A12 for cameras, A03 for performance)
  3. How much do you care about having a physical fingerprint scanner or biometric security? (A12 has a scanner, A03 doesn't)

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: You want the fastest experience for the price: Choose the Samsung Galaxy A03 for better chipset, GPU and newer software.
  • Scenario 2: You need a flexible camera and more RAM, a faster charging solution: Choose the Samsung Galaxy A12 for its additional camera lenses and a faster charging solution.
  • Scenario 3: You are a budget-constrained user that just needs a good phone for basic usage: Choose the Samsung Galaxy A03 for a more modern OS, better performance, and decent price.

My Choice

I would choose the Samsung Galaxy A03. While the A12 has a more versatile camera system and a fingerprint scanner which are nice additions, the significant performance boost of the Unisoc T606 in the A03 is a game-changer for me. The A03 will also have better software support with the later OS, which is an important factor to consider. For my general day-to-day use, which includes web browsing, app usage, and occasional gaming, the A03's performance edge makes it the better choice, especially considering its better audio features. The A12 is not bad but the A03 would be a more pleasant user experience in the long term, despite lacking some of the extras that the A12 has.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.