Smartphone Comparison: Samsung Galaxy A12 vs. Nokia G21
1. Specifications Comparison
Feature | Samsung Galaxy A12 | Nokia G21 | Practical Impact |
---|---|---|---|
Design | |||
Dimensions | 164 × 75.8 × 8.9 mm | 164.6 × 75.9 × 8.5 mm | The Nokia G21 is slightly thinner, making it feel marginally sleeker in hand. |
Weight | 205g | 190g | Nokia G21 is noticeably lighter, offering a more comfortable experience during extended use. |
Display | |||
Size | 6.5" | 6.5" | Both offer the same screen real estate for content consumption. |
Resolution | 720x1600 | 720x1600 | Both have the same clarity, which is adequate but not particularly sharp. |
Pixel Density | 270 PPI | 270 PPI | Similar pixel density means no visible difference in sharpness for the user. |
Technology | PLS LCD | IPS LCD | IPS LCD tends to offer slightly better viewing angles and color reproduction. |
Refresh Rate | 60Hz | 90Hz | The Nokia G21's 90Hz refresh rate provides noticeably smoother scrolling and animations. |
Brightness | 0 nits | 0 nits | Identical brightness means no difference in outdoor visibility under bright conditions (note: this value is likely incorrect as a practical display has nonzero brightness). |
Performance | |||
Chipset | Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12 nm) | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) | Different chipsets means performance may vary; the Nokia chipset is generally more efficient. |
AnTuTu Score | 103,000 | 253,300 | The Nokia G21 demonstrates significantly better performance for daily tasks, multitasking, and gaming. |
GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Mali-G57 MP1 | The Nokia G21's GPU offers improved graphical performance for gaming and visual tasks. |
Camera | |||
Standard Resolution | 48MP | 50MP | Nokia G21 offers slightly more detailed photos on paper. |
Standard Aperture | f/2.0 | f/1.8 | The wider aperture on the Nokia G21 allows for better low-light performance. |
Standard Sensor Size | 1/2" | 1/2.76" | Samsung A12 has a larger sensor that could improve light gathering but is paired with a smaller aperture. |
Selfie Resolution | 8MP | 8MP | Similar selfie resolutions mean similar detail captured. |
Selfie Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.0 | Nokia G21's wider aperture should result in slightly better low-light selfie performance. |
Telephoto Lens | 2MP | None | Samsung A12 allows for basic optical zooming. |
Wide Angle Lens | 5MP | None | Samsung A12 provides a wider field of view for landscape shots. |
Portrait Mode | 2MP | 2MP | Both phones offer similar depth-sensing for portrait photography. |
Macro Lens | None | 2MP | The Nokia G21 can take detailed close-up photos. |
Video Recording | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps | Both phones have comparable video capture capabilities. |
Battery | |||
Capacity | 5000mAh | 5050mAh | The difference in capacity is negligible, suggesting similar battery life. |
Charging | 15W Fast Charging | 18W Fast Charging | The Nokia G21 charges slightly faster, reducing charging time. |
Charger | None listed | 10W In-box Charger | Nokia G21 includes a charger in the box, saving the user an extra purchase. |
Software | |||
OS | Android 10 (upgradable to 12) | Android 11 (upgradable to 13) | The Nokia G21 offers a more up-to-date Android experience and longer software support. |
Connectivity | |||
Wi-Fi | 802.11a/b/g/n | 802.11a/b/g/n/ac | Nokia G21 includes 802.11ac, offering faster WiFi speeds if available. |
Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.0 LE | Samsung A12 includes more Bluetooth profiles, while the Nokia G21 features LE (Low Energy) Bluetooth. |
GPS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo | Nokia G21 supports more satellite systems, potentially improving location accuracy. |
Storage | |||
Internal | 32/64/128GB | 64/128GB | Both have similar maximum storage options; Samsung offers an entry-level 32GB model. |
RAM | 3/4/6GB | 4/6GB | Nokia G21 offers similar RAM variants, for smooth multitasking. |
Expandable Storage | No | No | Neither phone supports expandable storage. |
Audio | |||
Audio | Basic | 2 microphones | Nokia G21 has an edge in audio capture, likely leading to clearer calls and recordings. |
Security | |||
Fingerprint Sensor | Side-mounted | Side-mounted | Both have side fingerprint sensors for security. |
2. Key Differences Analysis
Samsung Galaxy A12 Advantages:
- Wider Camera System: Includes a dedicated telephoto and wide-angle lens, offering more versatility in shooting scenarios.
- More Bluetooth profiles: Offers a wider range of Bluetooth connectivity features.
- 32GB storage option: Available at a lower price point for users needing only minimal storage.
Practical Implications for Samsung Galaxy A12:
- Users get added flexibility with different zoom and field-of-view options.
- More features available through bluetooth.
- More affordable option for basic use.
Nokia G21 Advantages:
- Significantly Better Performance: The Unisoc chipset and higher AnTuTu scores indicate noticeably smoother and faster performance in daily tasks and gaming.
- 90Hz Refresh Rate: Provides a smoother, more fluid user experience.
- Improved Main Camera: Wider aperture and higher resolution on paper suggest better low-light and overall image quality.
- Macro Lens: Allows detailed close-up shots.
- Faster Charging: The 18W fast charging will fill the battery quicker than the Samsung A12.
- Included Charger: Convenient for those who don't have a charger already.
- More Up-to-Date OS: Comes with a newer version of Android and is eligible for further updates, providing better security and features.
- Improved GPS: More satellites to improve location accuracy.
- Audio: Better audio recording features.
Practical Implications for Nokia G21:
- Faster apps, better multitasking, and smoother gaming experiences.
- Visually smoother scrolling and animations.
- Potentially better images, especially in low light.
- More convenience, no need to buy a charger separately.
- Longer software support.
- More accurate location features.
- Clearer recordings.
Significant Trade-offs:
- Samsung Galaxy A12: The trade-off is lower overall performance and a less smooth display experience for the advantage of a more versatile camera system.
- Nokia G21: The trade-off is the lack of telephoto and wide angle lens for enhanced performance.
3. User Profiles & Recommendations
Ideal Users for Samsung Galaxy A12:
- Casual Photographers: Users who want flexibility in their photography, like wide-angle landscape or zoom shots, but aren't concerned with top-tier image quality.
- Budget-Conscious Buyers: Those looking for a very affordable smartphone with a decent set of features.
- Basic Smartphone Users: Individuals who primarily use a phone for calls, texts, social media browsing and web browsing but do not require top performance.
Ideal Users for Nokia G21:
- Performance-Oriented Users: Users who prioritize smooth performance, fast app loading, and slightly more demanding applications.
- Multimedia Consumers: Individuals who consume a lot of media on their phone, and value a smoother screen experience.
- Everyday Photographers: Users who mostly take standard shots and want good image quality in various lighting conditions and like to take close-up photos
- Users Prioritizing Software Support: Individuals who want the latest Android experience and security updates.
- Users that want good quality recordings: Individuals who often record voice notes and appreciate higher quality recording clarity.
Specific Use Cases:
- Samsung Galaxy A12: Ideal for casual landscape photography, social media content creation, and for users who only need basic functionality.
- Nokia G21: Excellent for browsing social media, streaming video content, playing casual games, and users that require quick app loading.
Price-to-Value Ratio:
- The Nokia G21 provides a better performance, smoothness, and better long-term value due to its superior chipset, display, and software. The extra features enhance the user experience, which is better than that of the Samsung Galaxy A12.
4. Decision Framework
Key Questions to Consider:
- What is my primary use case? Am I a casual user who prioritizes price, a photographer who wants a versatile system, or a user who seeks strong performance?
- How important is smooth performance? Do I prioritize a 90Hz refresh rate and quick app loading, or am I happy with basic performance?
- How much do I need camera versatility? Do I need wide angle and optical zoom, or am I content with a high-quality standard camera?
Scenario-Based Recommendations:
- Scenario 1: Casual User on a Tight Budget: If price is the absolute priority and performance is less important, the 32 GB Samsung Galaxy A12 is acceptable.
- Scenario 2: Everyday User Prioritizing Performance: If performance, smoother display, and overall user experience are key, the Nokia G21 is better.
- Scenario 3: Photography Enthusiast: If camera versatility with zoom and wide angle lenses is key, the Samsung Galaxy A12 is acceptable. However, if they prefer to take everyday photos with more detail, then the Nokia G21 is a better choice.
My Choice and Why
If I were choosing between these two phones, I would choose the Nokia G21. Here's why:
- Performance is a Priority: The significantly higher AnTuTu score of the Nokia G21 indicates a superior performance. The smoother 90Hz display offers a much more responsive user experience for everyday use.
- Better Everyday Camera: While the A12 has a wider camera system, the Nokia G21 boasts a better aperture, and I think this will be better for everyday standard shots and low light performance. The Macro lens is also useful for detailed close-ups.
- Longer Software Support: The newer Android version and the commitment to future updates mean the Nokia G21 will have security and feature updates for longer. This leads to better value long-term.
- Faster Charging and Included Charger: The 18W fast charging is more convenient, and the included charger is a useful bonus.
- GPS: The Nokia G21 uses more satellites which can greatly improve accuracy.
- Audio: I appreciate the addition of 2 microphones to improve voice recording.
While the Samsung A12 does offer more camera versatility, the overall improvements that the Nokia G21 offers are too significant to ignore. The better performance and display smoothness are crucial for daily use, and these improvements add up to a superior user experience.