Smartphone Comparison: Samsung Galaxy A12 vs. Motorola Moto G72
1. Specifications Comparison
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A12 | Motorola Moto G72 | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design | |||
| Dimensions | 164 × 75.8 × 8.9 mm | 160.5 × 74.4 × 7.9 mm | Moto G72 is more compact and thinner, potentially more comfortable to hold; A12 is slightly larger and bulkier |
| Weight | 205g | 166g | Moto G72 is significantly lighter, easier to handle for extended periods, less tiring in long usage |
| Display | |||
| Size | 6.5" | 6.6" | Negligible difference in screen size. Both offer a large screen experience, ideal for content consumption. |
| Resolution | 720x1600 | 1080x2400 | Moto G72 has a much sharper display, noticeable in text clarity and image details; A12 will look less sharp |
| Pixel Density | 270 ppi | 402 ppi | Moto G72's higher pixel density translates to finer detail and sharper visuals, better for viewing photos and videos |
| Technology | PLS LCD | P-OLED | Moto G72's P-OLED display offers richer colors, deeper blacks, and wider viewing angles compared to A12's LCD; better for visual experience. |
| Refresh Rate | 60Hz | 120Hz | Moto G72 offers smoother animations and scrolling, more responsive gaming experience compared to A12. |
| Brightness | 0 nits | 0 nits | Both phones have similar peak brightness, but the actual brightness is not specified, making comparison difficult, especially in outdoor visibility |
| Performance | |||
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 | Mediatek Helio G99 | Moto G72's chipset is significantly more powerful, leading to faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance; A12 is slower and less responsive. |
| AnTuTu Score | 103,000 | 415,300 | Moto G72 scores much higher, indicative of significantly better overall performance. |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Mali-G57 MC2 | Moto G72's GPU is more powerful, delivering better graphics for gaming and demanding apps. |
| Battery | |||
| Capacity | 5000mAh | 5000mAh | Both have the same capacity suggesting similar battery life under similar usage. |
| Charging | 15W | 33W | Moto G72 charges much faster, reducing downtime. |
| Camera | |||
| Main Camera | 48MP f/2.0 | 108MP f/1.7 | Moto G72 captures much higher-resolution photos, with a wider aperture allowing more light resulting in better low light performance |
| Selfie Camera | 8MP f/2.2 | 16MP | Moto G72 captures higher-resolution selfies |
| Telephoto Lens | 2MP f/2.4 | None | A12 has dedicated telephoto lens while Moto G72 doesn't |
| Wide Angle Lens | 5MP f/2.2 | 8MP f/1.9 | Moto G72 offers wider, higher resolution shots for group photos or landscapes. |
| Depth Sensor | 2MP f/2.4 | None | A12 has dedicated depth sensor while Moto G72 doesn't |
| Macro Lens | None | 2MP f/2.4 | Moto G72 has dedicated macro lens while A12 doesn't |
| Video Recording | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps | Moto G72 records at 60fps and allows for slower slow motion at 120 fps |
| Software | |||
| OS | Android 10, upgradable to 12 | Android 12 | Moto G72 has a more recent OS version out of the box. A12 can be upgraded, but the software may not be as optimized |
| Connectivity | |||
| Wi-Fi | 802.11a/b/g/n | 802.11a/b/g/n/ac | Moto G72 supports newer Wi-Fi standards, offering faster speeds and better range on compatible networks. |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.0 LE | Both use Bluetooth 5.0, however Moto G72 has added LE to save power |
| GPS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, SUPL, Galileo | Moto G72 supports additional satellite systems for more accurate location tracking. |
| Storage | |||
| Internal Storage | 32/64/128 GB | 128/256 GB | Moto G72 offers higher base and max storage, allowing more apps, photos, videos. |
| RAM | 3/4/6 GB | 6/8 GB | Moto G72 offers more RAM, improving multitasking and gaming. |
| Expandable Storage | No | No | Neither phone allows for storage expansion. |
| Audio | |||
| Audio Quality | Basic audio features | Dolby Atmos, Stereo Speakers | Moto G72 has much better audio quality with Dolby Atmos and Stereo Speakers offering much better experience. |
2. Key Differences Analysis
Motorola Moto G72 Advantages:
- Superior Display: Higher resolution, P-OLED technology, and 120Hz refresh rate provide a much better visual experience with sharper images, vibrant colors, and smoother animations.
- Significantly Better Performance: The Helio G99 chipset offers substantially better performance, resulting in faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and superior gaming capabilities.
- Enhanced Camera System: Higher-resolution main and selfie cameras, combined with a wider aperture, capture more detailed photos, especially in low-light conditions.
- Faster Charging: 33W fast charging significantly reduces charging times compared to the A12's 15W.
- More Recent OS: Android 12 out-of-the-box provides a more modern experience with the latest features.
- Better Audio: Dolby Atmos and Stereo Speakers provide a better audio experience.
Samsung Galaxy A12 Advantages:
- Telephoto Lens: Dedicated Telephoto Lens for optical zoom, something that Moto G72 lacks.
- Depth Sensor: Dedicated depth sensor for portrait mode shots.
- Lower Price: The Samsung Galaxy A12 is typically cheaper than the Moto G72, making it more budget-friendly for some users.
Trade-offs:
- The Moto G72 offers superior performance and features but comes at a higher cost, and does not have a dedicated depth sensor or telephoto lens.
- The Samsung Galaxy A12 is a budget option, but the user experience is generally less smooth and less visually appealing due to the lower quality screen and slower performance.
3. User Profiles & Recommendations
Ideal Users for Samsung Galaxy A12:
- Budget-conscious users: Prioritizing affordability over performance and features.
- Basic smartphone users: Who primarily use the phone for calling, texting, and basic social media.
- Users who like photography with different lenses: For users who like optical zoom and a depth sensor in their phones.
Use Cases:
- Basic web browsing and email.
- Casual social media use.
- Simple photography.
- Reliable for basic communication.
Ideal Users for Motorola Moto G72:
- Users seeking better overall performance: Who prioritize smooth multitasking, faster app loading, and better gaming experiences.
- Users who like higher quality display: Users who consume video media regularly.
- Users looking for a balance of price and quality: Wanting a better phone without breaking the bank.
Use Cases:
- Demanding mobile games.
- High-quality video playback.
- Multitasking between demanding apps.
- Users who want quick charging.
- Users who want to take good photos with their phone.
4. Decision Framework
Key Questions for Buyers:
- What is your budget?
- If budget is the primary concern, the Samsung Galaxy A12 is the more affordable option.
- How important is performance and smoothness?
- If performance and smooth experience is a key priority, the Motorola Moto G72 is the superior choice.
- What is your main use for your phone?
- If your main use is basic tasks, the Samsung Galaxy A12 may suffice; if you use many apps, enjoy video or play games, the Moto G72 is the better choice.
Scenario-Based Recommendations:
Scenario 1: Tight Budget, Basic Usage: If you need a basic phone for communication, casual web browsing, and social media, and budget is the main constraint, the Samsung Galaxy A12 is adequate.
Scenario 2: Prioritizing Smooth Performance, Decent Camera: If you want a smooth and responsive phone, enjoy mobile gaming and watching video with a better camera at a reasonable cost, the Motorola Moto G72 is a much better choice.
Scenario 3: User who wants a dedicated telephoto lens and depth sensor The Samsung Galaxy A12 offers a dedicated telephoto lens and depth sensor while the Moto G72 doesn't.
My Choice:
If I were choosing between these two phones, I would choose the Motorola Moto G72. The significant improvements in display quality, performance, and camera capabilities make it a much more compelling device for my usage patterns. I value a smooth and responsive user experience and watch media on my phone often, and the G72 would satisfy those needs much better. The faster charging is another key advantage. Although it might be more expensive, the enhancements it offers would provide much better value for the user.
