Samsung Galaxy A12 Nacho vs ZTE Blade A75 4G - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date August 9, 2021 July 1, 2024
Release Year 2021 2024

Physical

Volume 110.64 cm³ 106.97 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.17 "/g 3.49 "/g
Weight 205 g 189 g
Height 164 mm 164.1 mm
Width 75.8 mm 75.8 mm
Thickness 8.9 mm 8.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • Red
  • Blue
  • Basalt Black
  • Aqua Green
  • Marble White

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.6 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 720 x 1612
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82.1 % 84.1 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 267 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 45.19 mAh/cm³ 46.74 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Exynos 850 (8 nm) Unisoc T606 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G52 Mali-G57 MP1

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 13
Maximum OS Version 13

Comparison Summary

Alright, let's dive into a head-to-head comparison of the Samsung Galaxy A12 Nacho and the ZTE Blade A75 4G. We'll break down the specs, analyze the real-world impact, and figure out which phone is the better fit for different users.

1. Specifications Breakdown

Here's a detailed comparison table:

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A12 NachoZTE Blade A75 4GReal-World Implications
Design
Launch Date2021-08-092024-07-01The ZTE is much newer, potentially offering better software support.
Dimensions164 x 75.8 x 8.9 mm164.1 x 75.8 x 8.6 mmSimilar size, the ZTE is slightly thinner.
Weight205g189gZTE is noticeably lighter, making it more comfortable for extended use.
Display
Size6.5"6.6"Virtually the same viewing area.
Resolution720x1600720x1612Similar sharpness; both are HD+ displays, which is standard for this class of phone.
PPI270267Negligible difference in pixel density.
TechnologyPLS LCDIPS LCDIPS typically offers better viewing angles and color accuracy.
Refresh Rate60Hz90HzSmoother scrolling and animations on the ZTE.
Brightness0 nits0 nitsThis is a data anomaly, but assume comparable brightness levels.
Performance
ChipsetExynos 850 (8 nm)Unisoc T606 (12 nm)The Unisoc T606 in the ZTE is significantly faster.
AnTuTu Score117,300240,000The ZTE offers far better performance for gaming and demanding apps.
GPUMali-G52 (ARM Mali-G52)Mali-G57 MP1 (ARM Mali-G57)The Mali-G57 in the ZTE should offer better graphics performance.
Camera
Main Camera48MP f/2.050MP f/1.8The ZTE has a slightly wider aperture for better low-light performance.
Selfie Camera8MP f/2.28MPSimilar selfie capabilities.
Wide Angle Lens5MPNoneSamsung has an ultra-wide lens for more versatile photography.
Portrait Mode2MPNoneSamsung has dedicated depth sensor.
Macro Lens2MPNoneSamsung has a dedicated macro lens.
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fpsIdentical video recording capabilities
Camera FeaturesQuadruple cameraDual camera, Digital image stabilization, Continuous shooting, Panorama, White balance settings, ISO settings, Exposure compensationSamsung Galaxy A12 Nacho has additional features: Quadruple camera. ZTE Blade A75 4G has additional features: Dual camera, Digital image stabilization, Continuous shooting, Panorama, White balance settings, ISO settings, Exposure compensation
Battery Life
Capacity5000mAh5000mAhSimilar battery life potential.
Charging15W Fast Charging22.5W Fast ChargingFaster charging speeds on the ZTE.
Software
OSAndroid 11 (upgradable to 13)Android 13The ZTE comes with a more recent version of Android.
Storage
Internal32/64/128GB128/256GBZTE offers more storage capacity.
RAM3/4/6GB4/8GBZTE offers more RAM.
ExpandableNoNoNo expandable storage on either device.
AudioDolby AtmosDTS / DTS XBoth offer enhanced audio experiences.
SecuritySide FingerprintSide FingerprintSimilar biometric security.
SensorsAccelerometer, Proximity, FingerprintAccelerometer, Gyroscope, Proximity, FingerprintZTE has a Gyroscope, making it more suitable for AR apps and games.

2. Key Insights

  • ZTE Blade A75 4G Strengths:

    • Significantly Faster Performance: The Unisoc T606 chipset and higher AnTuTu score translate to snappier app loading, smoother multitasking, and a better gaming experience.
    • Newer Software: Comes with Android 13 out of the box, offering the latest features and security updates.
    • Faster Charging: 22.5W charging is a welcome upgrade for quickly topping up the battery.
    • Lighter Design: The lighter weight makes it more comfortable to hold for extended periods.
    • More RAM and Storage Options: The 8GB RAM and 256GB storage option provide more headroom for multitasking and storing media.
  • Samsung Galaxy A12 Nacho Strengths:

    • Ultra-Wide Lens: The inclusion of an ultra-wide lens provides more versatility in photography.
    • Established Brand: Samsung has a strong reputation for reliability and customer support.
    • Dolby Atmos: Offers enhanced audio for a more immersive sound experience.
  • Trade-offs and Limitations:

    • Both phones have HD+ displays, which might not be the sharpest for users accustomed to higher resolutions.
    • Neither phone supports expandable storage, which could be a limitation for heavy media users on the lower storage configurations.
    • The Samsung Galaxy A12 Nacho's older chipset lags significantly behind the ZTE in performance.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • ZTE Blade A75 4G is Ideal For:

    • Budget Gamers: The superior performance makes it a better choice for playing mobile games.
    • Everyday Users: Those who prioritize smooth performance for general tasks like browsing, social media, and streaming.
    • Users Who Want the Latest Software: Android 13 ensures access to the newest features and security patches.
  • Samsung Galaxy A12 Nacho is Ideal For:

    • Casual Photographers: Those who value the versatility of an ultra-wide lens for landscape and group shots.
    • Brand Loyalists: Users who prefer the Samsung ecosystem and trust its reliability.

4. Buying Decision Framework

Here are three questions to help you decide:

  1. How important is performance to you? If you need a phone that can handle gaming or demanding apps, the ZTE is the clear winner.
  2. Do you value having the latest software? The ZTE comes with Android 13, while the Samsung is older, but has been updated to the same version.
  3. How important is an ultra-wide camera lens? If you frequently take wide-angle photos, the Samsung might be more appealing.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: Tight Budget, Maximum Performance: Go with the ZTE Blade A75 4G. Its superior performance offers the best value for the money.
  • Scenario 2: Casual Use, Wide-Angle Photography Matters: The Samsung Galaxy A12 Nacho could be considered, though its performance might feel sluggish compared to the ZTE.
  • Scenario 3: Future Proofing and Long-Term Use: Again, the ZTE Blade A75 4G is the better choice due to its newer hardware and software.

What I would choose and why:

I would choose the ZTE Blade A75 4G. For me, performance is a key factor. I want a phone that can handle everyday tasks smoothly and even allow for some casual gaming without lagging. The significantly better chipset, coupled with the newer Android version and faster charging, makes it the more compelling choice. While I appreciate the ultra-wide lens on the Samsung, the overall experience on the ZTE is likely to be much more fluid and enjoyable, especially considering both devices are similarly priced.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.