Samsung Galaxy A05s vs Xiaomi Redmi A3 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date October 18, 2023 February 23, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 115.02 cm³ 106.58 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.45 "/g 3.48 "/g
Weight 194 g 193 g
Height 168 mm 168.3 mm
Width 77.8 mm 76.3 mm
Thickness 8.8 mm 8.3 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Silver
  • Black
  • Violet
  • Light Green
  • Midnight Black
  • Forest Green (Olive Green)
  • Star Blue (Lake Blue)

Display

Screen Size 6.7 " 6.71 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 720 x 1650
Aspect Ratio 20:9 21:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82.9 % 82.9 %
Pixel Density 393 PPI 268 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 500 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 111.38 mAh/in² 111.05 mAh/in²
Battery Density 43.47 mAh/cm³ 46.91 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) Mediatek Helio G36 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A53)
GPU Adreno 610 PowerVR GE8320

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A05sXiaomi Redmi A3Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions168x77.8x8.8mm168.3x76.3x8.3mmRedmi A3 is slightly thinner and narrower. Negligible difference in daily use.
Weight194g193gVirtually identical weight.
Build MaterialsNot specifiedNot specifiedCannot compare build quality and durability without more information.
Display
Size6.7"6.71"Negligible difference in screen real estate.
TypePLS LCD, 90HzIPS LCD, 90HzBoth offer smooth scrolling due to 90Hz refresh rate. PLS LCD generally offers slightly better color accuracy and viewing angles than IPS.
Resolution1080x2400 (FHD+)720x1650 (HD+)A05s has a significantly sharper display, resulting in clearer text and images. Redmi A3's lower resolution will be noticeable.
Pixel Density393 ppi268 ppiA05s offers much sharper visuals; Redmi A3's display will appear pixelated in comparison.
BrightnessNot specified500 nits (HBM)Redmi A3's specified peak brightness suggests better outdoor visibility. However, without A05s' peak brightness, a definitive comparison is impossible.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 680 4G (6nm)Helio G36 (12nm)Snapdragon 680 offers significantly better performance and efficiency due to its superior architecture and smaller manufacturing process.
CPUOcta-core (4x2.4 GHz & 4x1.9 GHz)Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz & 4x1.6 GHz)A05s has a faster CPU, resulting in smoother multitasking and app loading.
GPUAdreno 610PowerVR GE8320Adreno 610 provides better gaming performance and graphics rendering compared to the PowerVR GE8320.
RAM/Storage128GB/4GB, 128GB/6GB128GB/4GB, 128GB/6GBBoth offer similar RAM and storage options.
Battery
Capacity5000 mAh5000 mAhIdentical battery capacity suggests similar potential battery life. However, real-world usage will depend on software optimization and individual usage patterns.
Other
OSAndroid 13Android 14Redmi A3 ships with a newer Android version, potentially offering newer features and longer software support.
NFCYesYesBoth support contactless payments.
Video Recording1080p@30/60fps1080p@30fpsA05s offers 60fps recording for smoother video.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Samsung Galaxy A05s Advantages:

  • Significantly better performance: The Snapdragon 680 and Adreno 610 offer a smoother user experience, especially for gaming and demanding tasks.
  • Much sharper display: The FHD+ resolution provides noticeably clearer visuals.
  • Potentially better battery life: While battery capacity is the same, the more efficient chipset in the A05s may result in longer usage time.
  • 60fps video recording: Smoother video capture compared to Redmi A3's 30fps.

Xiaomi Redmi A3 Advantages:

  • Lower price: Positioned in the "low price" range, it offers greater affordability.
  • Newer Android version: Android 14 may provide longer software support and access to newer features.
  • Slightly thinner and lighter: Although the difference is minimal in practice.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Samsung Galaxy A05s: Users who prioritize performance, a sharp display, and overall smoother user experience. Suitable for gaming, media consumption, and multitasking.

Xiaomi Redmi A3: Budget-conscious users who prioritize affordability over top-tier performance. Suitable for basic tasks like calling, messaging, web browsing, and casual social media use.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions:

  1. What is your budget? If price is the primary concern, the Redmi A3 is the more affordable option.
  2. What are your primary smartphone usage patterns? For demanding tasks and media consumption, the A05s is superior. For basic use, the Redmi A3 may suffice.
  3. How important is display quality? The A05s' sharper display is a significant advantage for those who value visual clarity.

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy A05s

While the Redmi A3 offers a compelling price point, the significantly better performance and display of the Galaxy A05s make it the clear winner for me. The Snapdragon 680 provides a noticeably smoother experience, and the FHD+ resolution is crucial for comfortable media consumption and everyday use. The slightly higher price of the A05s is justified by the substantial improvement in user experience. The newer Android version on the Redmi A3 is a plus, but it doesn't outweigh the performance and display advantages of the A05s. I value a responsive and visually appealing experience, and the A05s delivers that more effectively.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.