Samsung Galaxy A05s vs Motorola Moto G85 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date October 18, 2023 June 25, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 115.02 cm³ 89.95 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.45 "/g 3.9 "/g
Weight 194 g 171 g
Height 168 mm 161.9 mm
Width 77.8 mm 73.1 mm
Thickness 8.8 mm 7.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Silver
  • Black
  • Violet
  • Light Green
  • Cobalt Blue
  • Olive Green
  • Urban Grey
  • Magenta

Display

Screen Size 6.7 " 6.67 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82.9 % 90.8 %
Pixel Density 393 PPI 395 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 1600 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 111.38 mAh/in² 112.39 mAh/in²
Battery Density 43.47 mAh/cm³ 55.59 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 610 Adreno 619

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A05sMotorola Moto G85Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions168 x 77.8 x 8.8 mm161.9 x 73.1 x 7.6 mmThe Moto G85 is noticeably smaller and thinner, making it potentially more comfortable for one-handed use and pocket portability.
Weight194g171gThe Moto G85 is significantly lighter, reducing hand fatigue during extended use.
Fingerprint SensorSide-mountedUnder displayPreference-based, but under-display sensors are often perceived as more modern.
Display
Display TypePLS LCD, 90HzP-OLED, 120HzThe Moto G85's OLED offers deeper blacks, more vibrant colors, and potentially better power efficiency. The higher 120Hz refresh rate provides smoother animations and scrolling.
Size6.7"6.67"Negligible size difference.
Resolution1080 x 24001080 x 2400Identical resolution, resulting in similar sharpness.
Peak BrightnessNot specified1600 nitsThe Moto G85's significantly higher peak brightness ensures excellent outdoor visibility. The lack of data for the A05s prevents a direct comparison, but 1600 nits is exceptionally bright.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 680 4GSnapdragon 6s Gen 3The Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 in the Moto G85 is newer and generally more powerful, leading to smoother performance in demanding tasks and games.
CPUOcta-core (4x2.4 GHz & 4x1.9 GHz)Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz & 6x2.0 GHz)The Moto G85's CPU architecture is more modern and likely offers better performance per core.
GPUAdreno 610Adreno 619The Adreno 619 offers improved graphics performance compared to the Adreno 610, beneficial for gaming and graphically intensive applications.
RAM/Storage128GB/4GB, 128GB/6GB256GB/12GBThe Moto G85 offers significantly more RAM and storage. 12GB RAM ensures smooth multitasking, while 256GB provides ample storage space.
Battery
Capacity5000 mAh5000 mAhIdentical battery capacity. Actual battery life depends on various factors including display type, processor efficiency, and software optimization.
Software
OSAndroid 13Android 14The Moto G85 ships with a newer Android version, offering potential access to newer features and security updates.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Moto G85 Advantages:

  • Superior Display: OLED with 120Hz refresh rate and high peak brightness offers a significantly better visual experience.
  • More Powerful Performance: Newer and faster chipset, CPU, and GPU provide smoother multitasking and gaming.
  • Larger Memory: More RAM and storage provide a smoother user experience and ample space for apps and files.
  • Newer OS: Android 14 potentially offers longer software support and newer features.
  • More Compact Design: Smaller and lighter build enhances portability and one-handed usability.

Samsung Galaxy A05s Advantages:

  • Potentially Lower Price: While not specified, Samsung's A series generally targets a more budget-conscious market.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Moto G85: Users who prioritize display quality, performance, and a modern design. Ideal for gaming, media consumption, and multitasking.

Samsung Galaxy A05s: Budget-conscious users who prioritize basic functionality and a large screen. Suitable for everyday tasks like calling, texting, and browsing.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Moto G85 likely commands a higher price due to its superior specifications.
  2. What are your primary use cases? Gaming, media consumption, and heavy multitasking benefit from the Moto G85's performance. Basic tasks can be adequately handled by the A05s.
  3. How important is display quality? The Moto G85's OLED display is a significant upgrade over the A05s' LCD.

My Choice: Motorola Moto G85

While pricing is a factor, the Moto G85 offers a significantly better overall package. The superior display, performance, larger memory, and more modern design make it a more compelling device for most users. The advantages in key areas like display and performance outweigh the potential price difference. The Moto G85 provides a more future-proof and enjoyable user experience. The brighter screen is crucial for outdoor use, the extra RAM ensures smoother multitasking, and the faster processor offers better performance in games and demanding applications. Even if the price premium is moderate, the value proposition of the Moto G85 is stronger.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.