Samsung Galaxy A05 vs Tecno Spark Go 2024 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date October 15, 2023 December 7, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 116.16 cm³ 106.43 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.44 "/g N/A
Weight 195 g 0 g
Height 168.8 mm 163.7 mm
Width 78.2 mm 75.6 mm
Thickness 8.8 mm 8.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Silver
  • Black
  • Light Green
  • Mystery White
  • Alpenglow Gold
  • Magic Skin
  • Gravity Black

Display

Screen Size 6.7 " 6.6 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 720 x 1612
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82.1 % 84.6 %
Pixel Density 262 PPI 267 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 111.38 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 43.04 mAh/cm³ 46.98 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support No No
Chipset Mediatek Helio G85 (12 nm) Unisoc T606 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G52 MC2 Mali-G57 MP1

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 N/A
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 13
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A05Tecno Spark Go 2024Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions168.8 x 78.2 x 8.8 mm163.7 x 75.6 x 8.6 mmSpark Go 2024 is slightly smaller and thinner.
Weight195g0g (Likely an error, expected ~190g)Weight difference is unclear due to erroneous data for the Spark Go 2024. Real-world impact on one-handed use and portability can't be accurately assessed.
Display
Size6.7"6.6"Negligible size difference in practical use.
TypePLS LCDIPS LCDBoth are LCD panels; PLS generally offers slightly better color reproduction and viewing angles compared to standard IPS, but the real-world difference is often subtle.
Resolution720 x 1600720 x 1612Virtually identical resolution; sharpness will be similar on both devices.
Refresh RateNot specified90HzThe 90Hz refresh rate on the Spark Go 2024 will result in smoother scrolling and animations, leading to a more fluid user experience.
Peak BrightnessNot specifiedNot specifiedCannot compare brightness and outdoor visibility.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Helio G85 (12nm)Unisoc T606 (12nm)Helio G85 generally offers slightly better gaming performance.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)The Galaxy A05 has faster CPU cores, potentially leading to quicker app loading and multitasking.
GPUMali-G52 MC2Mali-G57 MP1While G57 is a newer generation, the MC2 configuration in the A05 might provide slightly better performance in some scenarios. Difficult to definitively compare without benchmarks.
RAM/Storage128GB/4GB, 128GB/6GB128GB/4GBThe A05 offers a 6GB RAM option for potentially smoother multitasking.
Other
Battery5000 mAh5000 mAhSimilar battery capacity; actual battery life will depend on usage and optimization.
OSAndroid 13Android 13Both run on the latest Android version.
SensorsAccelerometer, ProximityAccelerometer, Fingerprint (side-mounted)Spark Go 2024 offers a fingerprint sensor for enhanced security and convenience.
PriceLowMediumThe A05 is expected to be more affordable.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Samsung Galaxy A05 Advantages:

  • Potentially faster CPU: The higher clocked CPU cores might offer a performance edge in demanding tasks.
  • 6GB RAM option: Provides smoother multitasking compared to the 4GB RAM in the Spark Go 2024.
  • Potentially better GPU: While unclear without benchmarks, the Mali-G52 MC2 could offer a slight advantage in gaming.
  • Lower Price: Offers better value for budget-conscious users.

Tecno Spark Go 2024 Advantages:

  • 90Hz Refresh Rate: Significantly smoother and more responsive display.
  • Fingerprint Sensor: Added security and convenience for unlocking the device.
  • Slightly Smaller Form Factor: Might be more comfortable for some users.

Trade-offs:

  • Spark Go 2024's higher price: Users pay more for the 90Hz display and fingerprint sensor.
  • A05's potential performance advantage: Users might sacrifice smoothness and security for raw performance.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Samsung Galaxy A05: Budget-conscious users who prioritize performance for everyday tasks and light gaming. Suitable for:

  • Casual users: Primarily using social media, browsing, and basic apps.
  • Students: Needing a reliable device for note-taking and research.

Tecno Spark Go 2024: Users who value a smooth and responsive display and prioritize security features. Suitable for:

  • Media consumers: Watching videos and playing casual games.
  • Users sensitive to display smoothness: Appreciating the fluid experience of a 90Hz refresh rate.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The A05 is a more budget-friendly option.
  2. How important is display smoothness? The 90Hz on the Spark Go 2024 is a significant differentiator.
  3. Do you need a fingerprint sensor? This is a security and convenience feature only available on the Spark Go 2024.

My Choice: Tecno Spark Go 2024

While the weight discrepancy makes a definitive judgment difficult, I'd choose the Tecno Spark Go 2024. The 90Hz refresh rate significantly enhances the daily user experience, making interactions feel much more fluid. The addition of a fingerprint sensor for security and convenience outweighs the potential slight performance advantage of the A05, especially considering the "medium" price range isn't significantly higher than "low" in most markets. A smooth and responsive display contributes significantly to user satisfaction, and I'd prioritize that over a marginal performance difference for everyday tasks.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.