Samsung Galaxy A05 vs Motorola Edge 50 Fusion - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date October 15, 2023 May 15, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 116.16 cm³ 93.5 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.44 "/g 3.83 "/g
Weight 195 g 174.9 g
Height 168.8 mm 161.9 mm
Width 78.2 mm 73.1 mm
Thickness 8.8 mm 7.9 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Silver
  • Black
  • Light Green
  • Forest Blue
  • Marshmallow Blue
  • Hot Pink

Display

Screen Size 6.7 " 6.7 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82.1 % 91.6 %
Pixel Density 262 PPI 393 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 1600 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 111.38 mAh/in² 111.38 mAh/in²
Battery Density 43.04 mAh/cm³ 53.48 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support No Yes
Chipset Mediatek Helio G85 (12 nm) Qualcomm SM7435-AB Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4 nm) - International
CPU Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.40 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) - International
GPU Mali-G52 MC2 Adreno 710

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 17

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A05Motorola Edge 50 FusionPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions168.8 x 78.2 x 8.8 mm161.9 x 73.1 x 7.9 mmThe Motorola is noticeably smaller and thinner, making it potentially more pocketable and comfortable to hold.
Weight195g174.9gThe Motorola is lighter, reducing hand fatigue during extended use.
Build MaterialsNot specifiedNot specifiedCannot compare build quality and durability without this information.
Display
Size6.7"6.7"Same screen size offering similar media consumption experience.
TypePLS LCDP-OLEDOLED offers deeper blacks, more vibrant colors, and potentially better power efficiency compared to LCD.
Resolution720 x 1600 (HD+)1080 x 2400 (FHD+)The Motorola has significantly sharper visuals due to higher resolution.
Refresh RateNot specified120Hz (LATAM), 144Hz (INT)Higher refresh rate on the Motorola results in smoother scrolling and animations, making the user experience feel more responsive. The regional difference in refresh rates is notable.
Peak BrightnessNot specified1600 nitsThe Motorola's superior peak brightness ensures better visibility in direct sunlight. The lack of this specification for the Samsung makes a direct comparison impossible.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Helio G85 (12nm)Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4nm)The Snapdragon chip in the Motorola is built on a smaller process node, indicating better power efficiency and potentially higher performance.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (4x2.40 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55)The Motorola boasts faster and more powerful CPU cores, translating to smoother multitasking and faster app loading.
GPUMali-G52 MC2Adreno 710The Adreno 710 in the Motorola offers superior graphics performance, benefiting gaming and graphically demanding applications.
RAM/Storage128GB/4GB, 128GB/6GB RAM256GB/8GB RAMThe Motorola offers significantly more RAM and storage, enhancing multitasking capabilities and providing ample space for apps and files.
Other
OSAndroid 13Android 14The Motorola comes with a newer Android version, offering potential access to newer features and security updates. It also benefits from longer OS support (up to Android 17).
NFCFalseTrueThe Motorola supports contactless payments and data transfer via NFC, a feature absent in the Samsung.
Battery5000 mAh5000 mAhSimilar battery capacity, though real-world battery life depends on other factors like display type and processor efficiency.
SensorsAccelerometer, ProximityAccelerometer, Gyro, Proximity, Compass, Fingerprint (under display)The Motorola offers a wider array of sensors, including a crucial in-display fingerprint sensor for enhanced security and convenience.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Edge 50 Fusion Advantages:

  • Significantly better display: Higher resolution, OLED technology, higher refresh rate, and higher peak brightness deliver a superior visual experience.
  • Superior performance: More powerful processor, GPU, and more RAM ensure smoother multitasking and better gaming capabilities.
  • More features: NFC for contactless payments, in-display fingerprint sensor for enhanced security.
  • Newer Software: Ships with Android 14 with guaranteed updates to Android 17.

Samsung Galaxy A05 Advantages:

  • Potentially lower price: Belonging to a lower price range, the A05 is likely more affordable.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Samsung Galaxy A05: Budget-conscious users who prioritize basic functionality (calling, texting, web browsing) and long battery life. Suitable for light users who don't engage in demanding tasks or gaming.

Motorola Edge 50 Fusion: Users who value a premium display, smooth performance, and modern features like NFC and an in-display fingerprint sensor. Ideal for multimedia consumption, gaming, and multitasking.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Motorola is likely significantly more expensive.
  2. What are your primary smartphone usage patterns? For basic usage, the Samsung might suffice. For demanding tasks, the Motorola is better equipped.
  3. Which features are most important to you? Prioritize features like display quality, performance, NFC, and sensor availability.

My Choice: Motorola Edge 50 Fusion

While the Samsung Galaxy A05 might be a suitable option for extremely budget-conscious buyers with basic needs, the Motorola Edge 50 Fusion offers a vastly superior overall experience. The significantly improved display, performance, feature set, and software support justify the likely higher price. The benefits in daily usage – from smoother scrolling and faster app loading to vibrant visuals and contactless payments – outweigh the potential cost difference for most users. The longer software update commitment also ensures the phone remains secure and relevant for a longer period. The lack of key specifications for the Samsung A05, like refresh rate and peak brightness, further hinders a complete comparison and makes a stronger case for the Motorola.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.