Samsung Galaxy A04s vs Realme C65 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Realme C65
Realme C65
Realme

General

Launch Date September 22, 2022 April 1, 2024
Release Year 2022 2024

Physical

Volume 114.96 cm³ 95.2 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.33 "/g 3.61 "/g
Weight 195 g 185 g
Height 164.7 mm 164.6 mm
Width 76.7 mm 76.1 mm
Thickness 9.1 mm 7.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • White
  • Green
  • Copper
  • Purple Nebula
  • Black Milky Way

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.67 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 720 x 1604
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 80.7 % 85.6 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 264 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 500 nits
HBM Brightness N/A 625 nits
Peak Brightness 400 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 112.39 mAh/in²
Battery Density 43.5 mAh/cm³ 52.52 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Exynos 850 (8 nm) Mediatek Helio G85 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G52 Mali-G52 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 14
Maximum OS Version 14

Comparison Summary

Alright, let's dive into a detailed comparison of the Samsung Galaxy A04s and the Realme C65. As always, I'm less interested in just reciting specs and more focused on what these numbers mean for you, the user.

1. Specifications Breakdown

Here's a detailed comparison table, designed to cut through the jargon and get to the heart of what matters:

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A04sRealme C65Real-World Implications
Design
Launch Date2022-09-222024-04-01C65 is significantly newer, suggesting more up-to-date tech.
Dimensions164.7 × 76.7 × 9.1 mm164.6 × 76.1 × 7.6 mmC65 is slimmer and potentially more comfortable to hold. A04s is thicker, feeling bulkier.
Weight195g185gC65 is slightly lighter, better for extended use.
Display
Size6.5"6.67"C65 offers a slightly larger screen, better for media consumption.
Resolution720x1600720x1604Very similar sharpness, suitable for everyday tasks on both devices.
Pixel Density (PPI)270264Minimal difference, should be barely noticeable in everyday use.
TechnologyPLS LCDIPS LCDC65's IPS LCD offers superior viewing angles and color reproduction compared to PLS.
Refresh Rate90Hz90HzSmooth scrolling and animations on both.
Brightness0 nits0 nitsSame brightness which seems to indicate data isn't available
Performance
ChipsetExynos 850 (8 nm)Mediatek Helio G85 (12 nm)C65's Helio G85 will likely be more powerful than the Exynos 850. The process node size difference is a minor factor.
AnTuTu Score117,300225,154C65 scores significantly higher, leading to smoother performance, faster app loading, and better gaming experience.
GPUMali-G52Mali-G52 MC2C65's MC2 offers improved graphical performance, beneficial for gaming.
Camera
Main Camera50MP, f/1.850MP, f/1.8 (1/2.76")Similar primary camera specs, but C65 has a larger sensor, possibly better low light performance.
Selfie Camera5MP, f/2.28MP, f/2.0C65 should produce better quality selfies with a higher resolution sensor.
Depth Camera2MP, f/2.42MP, f/2.4 (1/5")Similar specs, both assist in portrait mode. C65 has a smaller sensor which may have minor impact.
Macro Lens2MP, f/2.4NoneA04s has a dedicated macro camera, allowing for closer shots.
Video Recording1080p@30fps1080p@30fpsSimilar video recording capabilities for social media content.
Slow-Motion34 fps120 fpsC65 captures significantly more frames for slow-motion video.
Battery Life
Capacity5000mAh5000mAhExpected similar battery endurance for typical use.
Charging15W fast charging45W fast chargingC65 charges significantly faster, greatly reducing charging times.
Software & Connectivity
OSAndroid 12 (Upgradable to 14)Android 14C65 ships with a newer OS, potentially longer support timeline.
Wi-Fi802.11ac802.11n 5GHzBoth have similar Wifi bands but Samsung provides newer wifi bands.
Bluetooth5.0 LE5.0 LE, EDR, HIDC65 offers additional Bluetooth features such as EDR and HID.
Storage
Internal Storage32/64/128 GB128/256 GBC65 offers more storage options, essential for media and app users.
RAM3/4 GB6/8 GBC65 has more RAM leading to better app switching and multitasking.
Expandable StorageNoNoNo external storage available on both devices.

2. Key Insights

  • Realme C65 - The Clear Performer: The Realme C65 takes a strong lead in several key areas. Its chipset and higher AnTuTu score indicate significantly better performance for everyday tasks, app loading, and gaming. The faster charging and more advanced display technology are crucial benefits.

  • Samsung Galaxy A04s - The Basic Budget Option: The Samsung Galaxy A04s excels as a basic smartphone at a lower price. While it might not win in performance, it's good enough for essential tasks. It also has a macro lens camera which is a benefit.

  • Display: The C65’s IPS LCD offers better visuals than the A04s’ PLS LCD. This difference is noticeable when viewing content from different angles or enjoying media.

  • Charging: The 45W fast charging on the C65 is a game-changer. The A04s’ 15W charging is comparatively much slower.

  • Software: The C65 ships with a newer Android version and will likely have more extended support.

  • Camera: Both phones have similar cameras but the C65 has a larger sensor. The C65 also has a more useful front camera. The A04s has a macro camera which can be a benefit for close up photos.

  • Storage and RAM: The C65 has significantly more options for storage and RAM than the A04s.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Realme C65:

    • Best For: Users who prioritize performance, gaming, media consumption, and fast charging.
    • Ideal Use Cases: Frequent social media use, gaming, photography, daily multitasking. This phone excels when performance is important.
    • Value Proposition: Offers better performance and a more user-friendly experience for the price.
  • Samsung Galaxy A04s:

    • Best For: Users seeking a budget-friendly option for basic smartphone tasks.
    • Ideal Use Cases: Calls, texts, browsing, and other essential activities, where speed and performance isn't a must.
    • Value Proposition: A basic smartphone at a lower cost, good for those who don't demand high performance.

4. Buying Decision Framework

Here are three crucial questions to guide your decision:

  1. How important is performance to you? If smooth app transitions, multitasking, and gaming are priorities, the Realme C65 is the clear winner. If you only use it for essential tasks like calls and texting, the Samsung Galaxy A04s could do.
  2. What is your budget? While the exact pricing wasn't available, the Realme C65 will likely cost more due to its superior features. Is it a price you are willing to pay for better performance?
  3. How long do you plan to use the phone? If you want a device that will feel current for longer, the Realme C65, with its newer software, faster charging, and better processing power, is the better option.

My Choice and Why

If I were buying a phone between these two devices, I would choose the Realme C65.

Here's why:

  • Performance is Paramount: As a tech journalist, I need a phone that can handle multiple apps, frequent switching, and the occasional game. The C65's superior chipset and AnTuTu score make it a far more responsive device.
  • Fast Charging is a Must: The 45W charging on the C65 is something I value greatly, since I am often on the go, and don't have time to wait.
  • Better Display: The IPS LCD is a noticeable step up from PLS LCD, especially when it comes to watching media, which I do often.
  • Future Proofing: The newer OS and better overall performance mean the C65 will likely remain usable for a longer period of time, making it a worthwhile investment for me.

The Samsung Galaxy A04s is a decent budget phone, but for my needs and overall value, the Realme C65 is the clear winner. It offers a noticeable boost in performance, display quality, and charging speed, which are features I highly value in a daily driver. The small increase in price is a worthwhile investment for these improvements.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.