Samsung Galaxy A04e vs ZTE Blade A75 4G - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date November 7, 2022 July 1, 2024
Release Year 2022 2024

Physical

Volume 113.41 cm³ 106.97 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.46 "/g 3.49 "/g
Weight 188 g 189 g
Height 164.2 mm 164.1 mm
Width 75.9 mm 75.8 mm
Thickness 9.1 mm 8.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • Light Blue
  • Copper
  • Basalt Black
  • Aqua Green
  • Marble White

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.6 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 720 x 1612
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 81.8 % 84.1 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 267 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 44.09 mAh/cm³ 46.74 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support No Yes
Chipset Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12 nm) Unisoc T606 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU PowerVR GE8320 Mali-G57 MP1

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 13
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

Samsung Galaxy A04e vs. ZTE Blade A75 4G: A Deep Dive for the Budget-Conscious Buyer

Let's dissect these two budget-friendly contenders, the Samsung Galaxy A04e and the ZTE Blade A75 4G, to see which one offers the best bang for your buck. My goal is to arm you with the knowledge you need to make the right decision.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A04eZTE Blade A75 4GReal-World Implications
Design
Dimensions (mm)164.2 x 75.9 x 9.1164.1 x 75.8 x 8.6A75 slightly thinner and lighter, negligible in real-world use
Weight (g)188189Virtually identical weight
Display
Size (inches)6.56.6A75 slightly larger screen
Resolution720 x 1600720 x 1612Nearly identical resolution, expect similar sharpness
TypePLS LCDIPS LCD, 90HzA75's 90Hz refresh rate will deliver noticeably smoother scrolling and animations
Performance
ChipsetHelio P35 (12nm)Unisoc T606 (12nm)Both entry-level chipsets; T606 generally performs better in benchmarks
CPUOcta-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53)Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)A75's CPU architecture is more modern and efficient
RAM3GB/4GB4GB/8GBA75 offers more RAM, enabling better multitasking and smoother performance with multiple apps
Storage32GB/64GB/128GB128GB/256GBA75 offers significantly more storage for apps, photos, and videos
Camera
Rear Main13MP50MPA75 boasts a much higher resolution main camera, potentially capturing more detail
Front5MP8MPA75's selfie camera has a higher resolution
Battery Life
Capacity5000mAh5000mAhSimilar battery capacity; real-world battery life will depend on usage and optimization
Other
NFCNoYesA75 supports contactless payments and data transfer via NFC
OSAndroid 12Android 13A75 ships with a newer Android version, potentially offering more features and security updates

2. Key Insights

The ZTE Blade A75 4G pulls ahead in several key areas. Its 90Hz display is a major differentiator, providing a more fluid and responsive user experience. The Unisoc T606 processor, coupled with more RAM and storage options, positions the A75 for better overall performance and multitasking. The inclusion of NFC adds convenient functionalities like contactless payments. While the A04e offers a competitive battery capacity, its older hardware and lack of NFC feel dated.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Samsung Galaxy A04e: Best for users on an extremely tight budget who prioritize basic communication and light web browsing. If you rarely use multiple apps simultaneously and don't need the latest features, the A04e can suffice.
  • ZTE Blade A75 4G: Ideal for budget-conscious users seeking a more well-rounded experience. The smoother display, improved performance, greater storage, and NFC make it a better choice for gaming, media consumption, and general daily use.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  • What's your budget? Both phones are budget-friendly, but the A75 might be slightly more expensive depending on the storage configuration.
  • Do you prioritize performance and a smooth display? If yes, the A75's 90Hz display and more powerful processor make it the clear winner.
  • Do you need NFC for contactless payments? If this is a must-have feature, the A75 is the only option.

My Choice: The ZTE Blade A75 4G

If I were choosing between these two, I'd go for the ZTE Blade A75 4G. The 90Hz refresh rate alone significantly elevates the daily user experience, making interactions feel noticeably smoother and more responsive. The performance boost from the Unisoc T606 processor, coupled with the increased RAM and storage, ensures the phone can handle more demanding tasks without significant slowdowns. The addition of NFC for contactless payments is a welcome convenience. While the Samsung Galaxy A04e offers a competitive price, the A75 provides a better overall package that justifies the potential slight price difference. In the budget segment, these seemingly small differences have a significant impact on the overall user experience, and the A75 delivers a more enjoyable and future-proof device.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.