Samsung Galaxy A04e vs Xiaomi Poco C65 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date November 7, 2022 November 6, 2023
Release Year 2022 2023

Physical

Volume 113.41 cm³ 106.14 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.46 "/g 3.51 "/g
Weight 188 g 192 g
Height 164.2 mm 168 mm
Width 75.9 mm 78 mm
Thickness 9.1 mm 8.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • Light Blue
  • Copper
  • Black
  • Blue
  • Purple

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.74 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 720 x 1600
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 81.8 % 83.7 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 260 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 450 nits
HBM Brightness N/A 600 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 110.07 mAh/in²
Battery Density 44.09 mAh/cm³ 47.11 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support No Yes
Chipset Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12 nm) Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU PowerVR GE8320 Mali-G52 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 13
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

Let's dive into a comparative analysis of the Samsung Galaxy A04e and the Xiaomi Poco C65, two contenders in the budget smartphone arena. We'll dissect their specs, translate them into real-world implications, and help you determine which phone best fits your needs.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A04eXiaomi Poco C65Real-World Implications
Design
Dimensions (mm)164.2 x 75.9 x 9.1168 x 78 x 8.1Poco C65 is slightly larger; A04e is marginally thinner.
Weight (g)188192Negligible weight difference in hand.
Display
Size (inches)6.56.74Poco C65 offers a larger screen for media consumption.
Resolution (px)720 x 1600720 x 1600Both have the same resolution; Poco C65 has slightly lower pixel density due to larger size.
TypePLS LCDIPS LCDVirtually indistinguishable in daily use.
Refresh Rate (Hz)-90Smoother scrolling and animations on the Poco C65.
Performance
ChipsetHelio P35Helio G85G85 significantly more powerful, resulting in faster app loading and smoother multitasking.
CPUOcta-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53)Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)Poco C65 has a more modern and powerful CPU architecture.
GPUPowerVR GE8320Mali-G52 MC2Mali-G52 offers better gaming performance.
RAM (GB)36/8More RAM on Poco C65 allows for more apps to run in the background without reloading.
Camera
Rear Main (MP)1350Significantly higher resolution on Poco C65, potentially better image quality.
Front (MP)58Higher resolution selfie camera on Poco C65.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005000Similar battery capacity; real-world battery life will depend on usage and optimization.
Other
NFCNoYesPoco C65 supports contactless payments and data transfer.
OSAndroid 12Android 13Poco C65 ships with a newer Android version, potentially longer software support.

2. Key Insights

The Xiaomi Poco C65 boasts a clear performance advantage with its more powerful Helio G85 chipset, more RAM, and a higher resolution main camera. The 90Hz refresh rate display will also provide a noticeably smoother user experience. The inclusion of NFC opens up possibilities for contactless payments and other convenient features.

The Samsung Galaxy A04e, while less powerful, still offers a large display and a long-lasting battery. Its key advantage lies in its potentially lower price point.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

Poco C65: Best suited for users who prioritize performance, gaming capabilities, a smoother display, and modern features like NFC. This phone is ideal for multitasking, media consumption, and casual mobile gaming.

Galaxy A04e: Geared towards budget-conscious users who primarily use their phones for basic tasks like calling, texting, browsing, and social media. If performance isn't a top priority and you're on a tight budget, the A04e might be a suitable option.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  1. What is your budget? The A04e likely comes at a lower price point.
  2. What are your primary phone usage patterns? For basic tasks, the A04e suffices. For demanding tasks and gaming, the Poco C65 is superior.
  3. Do you need NFC for contactless payments? If yes, the Poco C65 is the only option.

My Choice: Xiaomi Poco C65

While pricing wasn't explicitly provided, the performance and feature advantages of the Poco C65 are compelling. The Helio G85, coupled with ample RAM and a 90Hz display, delivers a noticeably smoother and more responsive experience. The 50MP camera, NFC functionality, and newer Android version further solidify its position as the better overall device. For a slight price premium (assuming it exists), the Poco C65 offers significant value. The enhanced user experience justifies the potential extra cost, making it my preferred choice.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.