Samsung Galaxy A04e vs Cubot KingKong X - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date November 7, 2022 July 23, 2024
Release Year 2022 2024

Physical

Volume 113.41 cm³ 262.7 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.46 "/g 1.7 "/g
Weight 188 g 388 g
Height 164.2 mm 170.9 mm
Width 75.9 mm 82.2 mm
Thickness 9.1 mm 18.7 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • Light Blue
  • Copper
  • Black

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.58 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 1080 x 2408
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 81.8 % 74.2 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 401 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 235.59 mAh/in²
Battery Density 44.09 mAh/cm³ 38.83 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 10200 mAh
NFC Support No Yes
Chipset Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU PowerVR GE8320 Mali-G68 MC4

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 N/A
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 14
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

Samsung Galaxy A04e vs. Cubot KingKong X: A Deep Dive

Let's dissect the Samsung Galaxy A04e and the Cubot KingKong X, two phones targeting different segments of the market. We'll go beyond the spec sheet to understand what these differences mean for you.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A04eCubot KingKong XReal-World Implications
Design
Dimensions (mm)164.2 x 75.9 x 9.1170.9 x 82.2 x 18.7KingKong X significantly larger and heavier, emphasizing ruggedness over portability. A04e is sleeker.
Weight (g)188388KingKong X built for durability, potentially less comfortable for extended use. A04e easier to pocket.
Display
Size (inches)6.56.58Negligible difference in screen real estate.
Resolution720 x 16001080 x 2408KingKong X boasts sharper visuals, text, and images due to higher resolution. A04e's display will appear noticeably less crisp.
Display TypePLS LCDIPS LCD, 120HzBoth are LCD, but KingKong X's 120Hz refresh rate delivers smoother scrolling and animations, benefiting gaming and overall UI fluidity.
Performance
ChipsetHelio P35 (12nm)Dimensity 7050 (6nm)KingKong X offers significantly faster processing, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance due to its more modern and powerful chipset. A04e will feel sluggish in comparison.
CPUOcta-core 2.3 GHzOcta-core 2.6 GHzKingKong X has a faster CPU, resulting in quicker app launches and more responsive performance.
RAM3/4GB16GBMassive RAM advantage for KingKong X enabling seamless multitasking and keeping numerous apps open in the background without slowdowns. A04e will struggle with heavy multitasking.
Camera
Main Camera13MP100MPKingKong X offers higher resolution for potentially more detailed photos, though image quality depends on factors beyond megapixel count. Expect better low-light performance from the KingKong X.
Selfie Camera5MP32MPKingKong X provides significantly better selfie resolution.
Battery Life
Capacity (mAh)500010200KingKong X has over double the battery capacity, promising significantly longer usage time between charges.

2. Key Insights

  • Performance Disparity: The KingKong X significantly outperforms the A04e in processing power, RAM, and display refresh rate. This translates to a smoother, more responsive user experience across the board.
  • Rugged vs. Sleek: The KingKong X prioritizes durability and battery life with its rugged design and massive battery, while the A04e offers a more pocketable and lightweight form factor.
  • Display Quality: While both use LCD technology, the KingKong X offers a higher resolution and a faster refresh rate, resulting in a visibly superior visual experience.
  • Camera Capabilities: The KingKong X boasts a higher-resolution main and selfie camera, promising better image quality, especially in low light. However, real-world performance needs further testing.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Samsung Galaxy A04e: Best suited for budget-conscious users who prioritize basic communication, light web browsing, and casual social media usage. Not recommended for demanding tasks or gaming.
  • Cubot KingKong X: Ideal for users who need a durable, long-lasting phone with a smooth display and strong performance for multitasking, media consumption, and even moderate gaming. Also suitable for outdoor enthusiasts due to its rugged build.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  1. What is your budget? The A04e is a budget-friendly option, while the KingKong X sits in a higher price bracket.
  2. What are your primary phone usage patterns? For basic tasks, the A04e suffices. For demanding tasks, gaming, and media consumption, the KingKong X is a better choice.
  3. How important is battery life and durability? The KingKong X excels in these areas.

My Choice: I would choose the Cubot KingKong X. While more expensive, the significant performance upgrade, superior display, impressive battery life, and added durability make it a more compelling device for my needs. I value a smooth user experience and the ability to run demanding applications without lag. The 120Hz refresh rate and large RAM capacity are significant draws. While I appreciate the A04e's affordability, the performance compromises are too substantial for my personal preference. The KingKong X represents a better long-term investment due to its future-proof specifications.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.