Samsung Galaxy A03s vs Xiaomi Poco C65 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date August 18, 2021 November 6, 2023
Release Year 2021 2023

Physical

Volume 113.41 cm³ 106.14 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.32 "/g 3.51 "/g
Weight 196 g 192 g
Height 164.2 mm 168 mm
Width 75.9 mm 78 mm
Thickness 9.1 mm 8.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • Blue
  • White
  • Black
  • Blue
  • Purple

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.74 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 720 x 1600
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 81.8 % 83.7 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 260 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 450 nits
HBM Brightness N/A 600 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 110.07 mAh/in²
Battery Density 44.09 mAh/cm³ 47.11 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12 nm) Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.35 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU PowerVR GE8320 Mali-G52 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 13
Maximum OS Version 12

Comparison Summary

Okay, let's dive into a head-to-head comparison of the Samsung Galaxy A03s and the Xiaomi Poco C65. I'll break down the specs, highlight the key differences, and offer practical advice on which phone might be the better fit for you.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A03sXiaomi Poco C65Real-World Implications
Design
Dimensions164.2 x 75.9 x 9.1 mm168 x 78 x 8.1 mmPoco C65 is taller and wider but thinner; A03s is a bit bulkier.
Weight196g192gBoth are similar in weight, making them easy to handle.
Display
Size6.5"6.74"Poco C65 offers a slightly larger screen for a more immersive viewing experience.
Resolution720x1600720x1600Both offer the same resolution, so sharpness is similar.
Pixel Density (PPI)270260Practically identical pixel densities; screen sharpness is similar
TechnologyPLS LCDIPS LCDIPS LCD on Poco C65 typically provides better viewing angles and color reproduction.
Refresh Rate60Hz90HzPoco C65's 90Hz refresh rate offers smoother scrolling and animations.
Brightness0 nits0 nitsPeak brightness identical, but real-world brightness depends on screen calibration.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Helio P35Mediatek Helio G85G85 is significantly faster, leading to better app performance and smoother gaming.
AnTuTu Score117,049237,768Poco C65 demonstrates much better overall system performance.
GPUPowerVR GE8320Mali-G52 MC2G52 is a more capable GPU, offering better graphical performance for gaming.
Camera
Main Camera13MP, f/2.250MP, f/1.8Poco C65 captures significantly more detail and performs better in low light.
Selfie Camera5MP, f/2.08MP, f/2.2Poco C65 selfie camera is better with higher resolution.
Depth CameraNo2MP, f/2.4Poco C65 offers a dedicated depth camera, for better portrait mode effects.
Macro Lens2MP, f/2.32MP, f/2.4Both have a macro lens but the A03s is marginally better with a wider aperture
Video Recording1080p@30fps1080p@30fpsBoth can record video at the same resolution and frame rate for social media.
Slow-MotionNoYes, 120fpsPoco C65 is better for capturing slow-motion video recording
Camera FeaturesPanorama4K Video, Digital image stabilization, RAWPoco C65 has more modern features, including 4K recording and RAW capture
Battery Life
Capacity5000mAh5000mAhBoth offer good all-day battery life.
ChargingLi-Ion18W fast charging, Li-PolymerPoco C65 charges significantly faster.
Additional FeaturesNon-removableReverse charging, Non-removablePoco C65 can be used to charge other devices.
Software
OSAndroid 11 (upgradable to 12)Android 13Poco C65 comes with a more recent version of Android, with longer software update support likely.
Connectivity
Wi-Fi802.11 b/g/n802.11 a/b/g/n/acPoco C65 supports faster Wi-Fi standards and dual-band capabilities.
Bluetooth5.0 LE5.3 LE, APT-xPoco C65 has better bluetooth performance
GPSGPS, A-GPS, GLONASSGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, GalileoPoco C65 offers more satellite support for more precise navigation.
SIMDual SIMDual SIMBoth can use two SIM cards at the same time.
Storage & Memory
Internal Storage32GB/64GB128GB/256GBPoco C65 offers significantly more storage space.
RAM3GB/4GB4GB/6GB/8GBPoco C65 has more RAM options for better multitasking and gaming.
Expandable StorageNoNoNeither offers expandable storage.
Audio
QualityBasic audioBasic audioBoth offer standard audio output capabilities.
Security
FeaturesSide-mounted fingerprint sensorSide-mounted fingerprint sensorBoth offer similar fingerprint sensors
Sensors
SensorsFingerprint, Proximity, AccelerometerFingerprint, Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Ultrasonic proximityPoco C65 provides additional sensors, making it a better option for gaming

2. Key Insights

Samsung Galaxy A03s

Strengths:

  • Familiar Design: Retains the classic Samsung design, which many users find comfortable and reliable.
  • Decent Battery Life: The 5000mAh battery provides good endurance, enough for a full day of moderate use.
  • Affordable: It's typically a cheaper option, making it a budget-friendly choice for basic smartphone needs.

Limitations:

  • Performance: The Mediatek Helio P35 chipset is quite basic and can struggle with demanding apps and games.
  • Display: While decent, the PLS LCD panel and 60Hz refresh rate are less advanced compared to the Poco C65.
  • Camera: The 13MP main camera doesn't capture as much detail as the Poco C65.
  • Storage: Limited internal storage options.
  • Old Software: Comes with an older version of Android

Xiaomi Poco C65

Strengths:

  • Performance: The Mediatek Helio G85 chip is a significant upgrade, providing much better overall speed and gaming performance.
  • Display: The 90Hz IPS LCD display offers a smoother, more fluid visual experience.
  • Camera: The 50MP main camera captures significantly more detail and performs better in low-light.
  • Storage & RAM: Offers significantly more internal storage and RAM for better multitasking.
  • Connectivity: Supports faster Wi-Fi and has a newer version of Bluetooth.
  • Charging: Features 18W fast charging for faster top-ups.
  • Software: Comes with a more recent version of Android

Limitations:

  • Price: Might be slightly more expensive than the A03s
  • No expandable storage: Both do not have expandable storage.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

Samsung Galaxy A03s is Ideal For:

  • First-time smartphone users: Simpler to use and very affordable.
  • Users who prioritize basic needs: Calls, messages, and occasional social media use.
  • Those on a tight budget: Who need a reliable device without frills.

Use Cases:

  • A simple phone for older adults who may not need advanced features.
  • A backup phone for emergencies, keeping costs low.
  • For younger children, where performance is not a primary need.

Xiaomi Poco C65 is Ideal For:

  • Budget gamers: Those looking for decent gaming performance without breaking the bank.
  • Multimedia lovers: Those who value a smoother display and better camera quality.
  • Users who need more storage and RAM: For better multitasking and more apps.
  • Tech enthusiasts: Looking for a newer phone with more modern features.

Use Cases:

  • Playing basic to mid-range mobile games smoothly.
  • Taking high-quality photos for social media and personal use.
  • Watching videos or browsing social media comfortably.
  • Running multiple applications without major slowdowns.

4. Buying Decision Framework

Here are three practical questions to guide your decision:

  1. What is your budget? If budget is the main constraint, the Galaxy A03s is more affordable but the Poco C65 provides much better value.
  2. How important is performance? If you want a smoother experience for apps and games, the Poco C65's superior processor makes a big difference.
  3. What are your typical use cases? For basic tasks, the A03s will suffice. But for demanding usage like gaming or photography, the Poco C65 will offer a superior experience.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • The Budget-Conscious User: If you prioritize low cost above all else, the Samsung Galaxy A03s might be a viable option.
  • The Casual User with Moderate Needs: The Xiaomi Poco C65 would be better as it has much better overall value.
  • The Multimedia Consumer: The Xiaomi Poco C65 shines with its larger, smoother display, better camera, and enhanced performance.
  • The Mobile Gamer: The Xiaomi Poco C65 is the clear choice due to its powerful processor and higher refresh rate display

My Choice

If I were choosing between these two phones, I'd absolutely go with the Xiaomi Poco C65. While the Samsung Galaxy A03s is certainly a more affordable option, the Poco C65 offers a vastly superior experience in almost every single category.

The biggest deal for me is the performance jump from the Helio P35 to the Helio G85. It's not just about numbers; the G85 means smoother app switching, faster loading times, and the ability to play more games without annoying lag. The 90Hz display is also a big deal, it's one of those things you don't realize you're missing until you use it. And let's talk about the camera: the 50MP sensor on the Poco C65 is simply better. I love having a camera on my phone that I can depend on for quick, quality shots. Also, the Poco C65’s larger storage and RAM makes sure I won't be constantly managing files or closing apps.

The price difference would be negligible in the grand scheme of things, and I know I'd be much happier with the overall experience that the Poco C65 offers. It simply offers far more value.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.