Samsung Galaxy A03s vs Motorola Moto G52 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date August 18, 2021 April 20, 2022
Release Year 2021 2022

Physical

Volume 113.41 cm³ 95.42 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.32 "/g 3.91 "/g
Weight 196 g 169 g
Height 164.2 mm 160.1 mm
Width 75.9 mm 74.5 mm
Thickness 9.1 mm 8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • Blue
  • White
  • Charcoal Gray
  • Porcelain White

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.6 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 81.8 % 88.2 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 402 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 44.09 mAh/cm³ 52.4 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12 nm) Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.35 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver)
GPU PowerVR GE8320 Adreno 610

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 12
Maximum OS Version 12

Comparison Summary

Alright, let's dive into a detailed comparison of the Samsung Galaxy A03s and the Motorola Moto G52. We'll break down the specs, highlight key differences, and figure out which phone might be the best fit for you.

1. Specifications Breakdown

Here’s a detailed look at how these two phones stack up, focusing on what really matters in day-to-day use:

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A03sMotorola Moto G52Real-World Implications
Design
Dimensions164.2 x 75.9 x 9.1 mm160.1 x 74.5 x 8 mmThe Moto G52 is noticeably slimmer and lighter, making it more comfortable for extended use and easier to slip into a pocket.
Weight196g169gThe Moto G52 feels significantly lighter, reducing fatigue during long calls or browsing sessions.
Display
Size6.5"6.6"Both screens are large enough for media consumption and browsing, with a negligible 0.1" size difference.
Resolution720 x 16001080 x 2400The Moto G52's higher resolution makes text and images sharper, resulting in a more pleasant viewing experience, particularly for detailed content.
Pixel Density (PPI)270402The Moto G52 will have a visibly clearer and more detailed display thanks to the higher PPI.
TechnologyPLS LCDAMOLEDThe Moto G52's AMOLED screen offers deeper blacks, more vibrant colors, and better contrast, making media content more immersive.
Refresh Rate60Hz90HzThe Moto G52's 90Hz refresh rate makes scrolling and animations feel smoother, adding a subtle but noticeable improvement to the overall experience.
Brightness0 nits0 nitsBoth have identical peak brightness, though its important to note, that the 0 nit value seems like an error and in practice both phones would likely have similar brightness profiles
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Helio P35 (12 nm)Snapdragon 680 (6 nm)The Moto G52's more efficient and powerful chipset will result in faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and better overall responsiveness.
AnTuTu Score117,049216,000The Moto G52 is significantly faster, making it more capable for gaming and demanding apps.
GPUPowerVR GE8320Adreno 610The Moto G52's GPU will provide better graphics performance, important for gaming.
Camera
Rear Camera13MP (f/2.2)50MP (f/1.8)The Moto G52's primary camera captures more detailed shots thanks to higher resolution and performs better in low light with wider aperture.
Selfie Camera5MP (f/2.0)16MP (f/2.45)The Moto G52's selfie camera takes higher-resolution photos, resulting in clearer, more detailed self-portraits.
Wide Angle LensN/A8MP (f/2.2)The Moto G52 provides additional versatility with a dedicated wide-angle lens.
Macro Lens2MP (f/2.3)2MP (f/2.4)Both have macro lens for close-up photography, the A03s has a slightly wider aperture.
Video Recording1080p@30fps1080p@30fpsBoth record at similar quality, suitable for everyday videos. The Moto G52 also has a 4k video recording capability not available on the Samsung.
Battery Life
Capacity5000 mAh5000 mAhBoth phones will likely offer similar battery life based on capacity, although other factors will affect actual duration.
ChargingLi-Ion30W Fast Charging, Li-IonThe Moto G52 charges much faster, significantly reducing downtime.
Software
OSAndroid 11 (upgradable to 12)Android 12The Moto G52 ships with a more up-to-date version of Android, providing the latest features and security enhancements.
Storage
Internal32GB or 64GB64GB, 128GB or 256GBThe Moto G52 offers more storage options, allowing for more apps, photos, and videos.
RAM3GB or 4GB4GB or 6GBThe Moto G52 has more RAM for smoother multitasking and handling resource-intensive applications.
ExpandableNoNoNeither phone allows for external storage expansion.
Audio
FeaturesBasic audio featuresDolby Atmos, Stereo Speakers, 2 MicrophonesThe Moto G52 offers superior audio quality with enhanced spatial audio and better voice capture.
Connectivity
Wi-Fi802.11 b/g/n802.11 a/b/g/n/acThe Moto G52 supports a wider range of Wi-Fi bands including 5 GHz, and Wi-Fi direct for a potentially better and faster connection.
Bluetooth5.0 LE5.0 LE with more profilesThe Moto G52 provides more Bluetooth profiles, increasing compatibility with a wider range of audio devices and accessories.
GPSGPS, A-GPS, GLONASSGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, SUPL, GalileoThe Moto G52 supports more satellite systems, providing potentially more accurate location tracking.
Security
FeaturesSide-Mounted Fingerprint SensorSide-Mounted Fingerprint SensorBoth phones offer basic biometric security features through a side-mounted fingerprint sensor.
Build Quality
ProtectionUnknownCorning Gorilla Glass 5The Moto G52's screen has better protection against scratches and minor impacts thanks to Gorilla Glass.
Sensors
FeaturesFingerprint, Accelerometer, ProximityFingerprint, Accelerometer, Proximity, Compass, GyroscopeThe Moto G52 has a more comprehensive set of sensors, enabling advanced features and gaming capabilities.

2. Key Insights

Samsung Galaxy A03s Strengths:

  • Affordable: The A03s is generally more budget-friendly.
  • Battery Life: The large battery should provide all day use.
  • Brand Recognition: Samsung is a well-known and trusted brand.

Motorola Moto G52 Strengths:

  • Superior Display: The AMOLED screen with a 90Hz refresh rate offers a much better visual experience.
  • Enhanced Performance: The Snapdragon 680 chipset is much faster and more efficient.
  • Better Camera: The 50MP main camera and 16MP selfie camera take much more detailed photos and videos.
  • Faster Charging: 30W fast charging greatly reduces charging times.
  • Advanced Audio: Dolby Atmos and stereo speakers enhance the media consumption experience.
  • Better Connectivity: Modern Wi-Fi and Bluetooth capabilities.
  • Build Quality: Gorilla Glass 5 offers better screen protection.

Trade-offs and Limitations

  • The Samsung A03s lags significantly behind in performance, screen quality, and camera capabilities when compared to the Moto G52.
  • The A03s is cheaper, but users might find it limiting due to its lower-resolution display and less powerful processor.
  • The Moto G52 does not offer expandable storage, this could be a limiting factor for users who would prefer it.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

Samsung Galaxy A03s:

  • Budget-Conscious Users: Perfect for those who need a basic smartphone for everyday tasks without breaking the bank.
  • Casual Users: Ideal for users who primarily make calls, send texts, and browse social media lightly, and value battery life above all other features.
  • First-Time Smartphone Owners: A user-friendly device that’s easy to use and learn.

Motorola Moto G52:

  • Media Consumers: The AMOLED screen and enhanced audio make it great for watching videos and listening to music.
  • Everyday Users: Offers a more responsive and smoother experience for daily tasks.
  • Photo Enthusiasts: Those who value a good camera for casual photography will appreciate the Moto G52.
  • Moderate Gamers: While not a gaming powerhouse, it handles less demanding games reasonably well.

4. Buying Decision Framework

Here are three questions to help guide your decision:

  1. What's Your Budget? If affordability is the primary concern, the Samsung A03s is the lower cost option.
  2. How Important Is Performance? If you prioritize a smoother, faster experience with good camera quality and enhanced features, the Moto G52 is superior.
  3. What Are Your Must-Have Features? If you need a device that can handle basic tasks and has good battery life, the A03s is adequate. If you value a higher-quality display, camera, audio, and a faster charging experience, the Moto G52 is better.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: Tight Budget, Basic Needs

    • Recommendation: Samsung Galaxy A03s
    • Why: The A03s is budget-friendly and can handle essential tasks like calling, texting, and basic browsing.
  • Scenario 2: Value-Conscious Media User

    • Recommendation: Motorola Moto G52
    • Why: The Moto G52 has a much better display and audio experience, making it perfect for watching videos, listening to music, and browsing content.
  • Scenario 3: Performance and Camera Are Key

    • Recommendation: Motorola Moto G52
    • Why: The Moto G52’s faster processor, better camera, and faster charging make it the best choice for users seeking better all-round performance and a more reliable everyday phone.

Final Thoughts: My Choice

If I had to choose between these two phones, I would definitively pick the Motorola Moto G52. The differences in screen quality, performance, camera capabilities, and charging speed are significant enough to justify the slightly higher price point. While the Samsung Galaxy A03s has its place as a budget phone, it simply doesn’t offer the same level of overall user experience. The Moto G52's AMOLED display, smoother performance, and superior camera make it a much more satisfying device to use on a daily basis. The addition of fast charging and enhanced audio seals the deal for me, making it the clear winner in this comparison.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.