Samsung Galaxy A03 vs Oppo A77 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Oppo A77
Oppo A77
Oppo

General

Launch Date January 21, 2022 June 10, 2022
Release Year 2022 2022

Physical

Volume 113.41 cm³ 98.41 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.32 "/g 3.45 "/g
Weight 196 g 190 g
Height 164.2 mm 163.8 mm
Width 75.9 mm 75.1 mm
Thickness 9.1 mm 8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • Red
  • Blue
  • Midnight Black
  • Ocean Blue

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.56 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 720 x 1612
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 81.8 % 84 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 269 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 480 nits
HBM Brightness N/A 600 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 116.19 mAh/in²
Battery Density 44.09 mAh/cm³ 50.81 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support No Yes
Chipset Unisoc T606 (12 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G57 MP1 Mali-G57 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features microUSB 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 12
Maximum OS Version 13 14

Comparison Summary

Okay, let's break down the Samsung Galaxy A03 and Oppo A77, putting aside the marketing fluff and focusing on what really matters for everyday users. Here's my take, diving deep into the specs and translating them into real-world experiences.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A03Oppo A77Real-World Implications
Design
Dimensions164.2 x 75.9 x 9.1 mm163.8 x 75.1 x 8 mmA03 is slightly bulkier and thicker; A77 is more streamlined and lighter, potentially more comfortable in hand.
Weight196g190gA77 is marginally lighter, which might be noticeable during long usage sessions.
Display
Size6.5"6.56"Nearly identical screen sizes; negligible difference in real-world viewing.
Resolution720x1600720x1612Similar resolutions; expect HD quality, not ultra-sharp details.
PPI270269Similar pixel density; both displays will look equally sharp or blurry.
TechnologyPLS LCDIPS LCDA77's IPS LCD offers slightly better viewing angles and color accuracy compared to the PLS LCD of the A03.
Refresh Rate60Hz90HzA77's 90Hz refresh rate will deliver smoother scrolling and animations, a noticeable perk for daily use.
Brightness0 nits0 nitsBoth have the same brightness, which is problematic as it means that they are not displaying anything. This must be an error in the provided information.
Performance
ChipsetUnisoc T606 (12nm)Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6nm)A77's 6nm chip is significantly more powerful and efficient than the A03's 12nm chip.
AnTuTu Score174,93242,000A03 scores way higher in benchmarks, but this is not reflective of real world performance. This is likely an error in the data provided.
GPUMali-G57 MP1Mali-G57 MC2A77's GPU will handle graphics-intensive tasks and games better due to its additional core.
Camera
Main Camera48MP (f/1.8)13MP (f/2.2)A03 has higher resolution and wider aperture, leading to better low-light performance in theory.
Selfie Camera5MP (f/2.2)16MP (f/2.0)A77's selfie camera has significantly higher resolution and a slightly wider aperture.
Depth Camera2MP (f/2.4)N/AA03 has a dedicated depth sensor, which might enhance portrait mode shots (when it works).
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fpsBoth record 1080p at 30fps, good enough for social media but not for high-quality videos.
FeaturesDual CameraDigital Image StabilizationA03 has dual camera setup. A77 offers digital image stabilization.
Battery Life
Capacity5000mAh3200mAhA03 has a considerably larger battery, which should translate to significantly longer battery life.
Charging7.5W FastStandardA03 offers 7.5W fast charging. Neither phone seems to offer truly fast charging.
Battery TypeLi-IonLi-PolymerBoth feature non-removable batteries; no user replacement.
Software
OSAndroid 11Android 12A77 has a newer version of Android out of the box which will be supported for longer than A03.
Connectivity
Wi-Fi802.11b/g/n/ac802.11a/b/g/n/acA03 has the newer Wi-Fi standard (ac), while the A77 has 5 GHz band.
Bluetooth5.0 LE4.1A03 has the newer Bluetooth which is more power-efficient, offers a faster connection and can reach a longer distance.
Storage
Internal32/64/128 GB32/64 GBA03 has the additional 128 GB option, more storage if you need it.
ExpandableNoNoNo expandable storage for either phone.
Audio
QualityDolby AtmosBasicA03 has Dolby Atmos, better audio quality.
Security
FeaturesBasic securitySide-mounted fingerprintA77 has a fingerprint reader, a convenient and secure way to unlock.
Build
ProtectionUnknownGorilla Glass 5A77 has a better screen protection, less prone to scratches.

2. Key Insights

Samsung Galaxy A03 Strengths:

  • Battery Life: The A03’s 5000mAh battery is a significant advantage, potentially allowing users to go a full day, or even two, on a single charge.
  • Main Camera: The higher resolution main camera with a wider aperture should offer better low-light performance compared to the A77.
  • Audio Quality: Dolby Atmos provides superior audio for media consumption.
  • Storage: 128 GB variant is available for those that require more internal space.
  • Bluetooth: The newer Bluetooth 5.0 LE offers better range and power efficiency.

Oppo A77 Strengths:

  • Display: The 90Hz IPS LCD screen offers noticeably smoother visuals and better color accuracy than the A03's display.
  • Performance: The Mediatek Dimensity 810 chip is a more modern and powerful processor, making the phone much snappier for everyday tasks and gaming.
  • Selfie Camera: A higher-resolution front camera with a wider aperture will deliver better selfies.
  • Security: The inclusion of a side-mounted fingerprint sensor offers a convenient way to secure the phone.
  • Build Quality: Corning Gorilla Glass 5 provides superior scratch protection.
  • Software: Newer version of android and will likely be supported for longer.

Trade-offs and Limitations:

  • The Samsung Galaxy A03 sacrifices display quality and performance for battery life and lower cost.
  • The Oppo A77, while smoother, has a smaller battery and doesn't offer an expandable storage option.
  • Neither phone offers truly fast charging.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Samsung Galaxy A03: Best suited for users who prioritize battery life above all else and are on a tight budget. Ideal for those who mainly use their phones for calls, texts, social media, and casual browsing and are not demanding of its performance.
  • Oppo A77: More appropriate for users who want a smoother, more responsive experience and take a lot of selfies, while keeping a modern design. It's better suited for everyday usage, social media and light gaming.

4. Buying Decision Framework

Here are three key questions to help users decide:

  1. Battery Life vs. Performance: Do you need all-day battery life, even if it means a slightly slower phone (A03), or do you prefer snappier performance but don't mind charging more frequently (A77)?
  2. Display Quality: Do you prefer a more accurate and smooth display (A77), or does that not matter for your usage?
  3. Selfies Do you take a lot of selfies (A77) or do you tend to use the main camera more?

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • The "On-the-Go" User: If you're always out and need a phone that lasts all day without worrying about charging, the Samsung Galaxy A03 might be your better choice.
  • The "Social Media" User: If you are on social media more often, want smooth performance, great selfies, and a more modern design, then the Oppo A77 is a better choice.
  • The "Budget-Conscious" User: If you are on a tight budget, the Samsung Galaxy A03 is probably the better pick, however, do keep in mind that the A77 might last you longer due to the more modern processor.

Which Would I Choose?

Personally, I'd lean towards the Oppo A77. While the larger battery of the A03 is tempting, the improved display, superior performance, and the inclusion of the fingerprint sensor on the A77 makes it a better choice for everyday use. The smoothness of the 90Hz display and the responsiveness of the Mediatek chipset would enhance my daily experience far more than an extra few hours of battery life, which I can compensate for with a small portable charger. The superior selfie camera and the additional safety measures are also a must for me. As a tech journalist, I need a phone that can keep up with my workload, and the A77 seems better suited for that.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.