Samsung Galaxy A02s vs Xiaomi Poco C40 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date January 4, 2021 June 17, 2022
Release Year 2021 2022

Physical

Volume 113.41 cm³ 119.52 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.32 "/g 3.29 "/g
Weight 196 g 204 g
Height 164.2 mm 169.6 mm
Width 75.9 mm 76.6 mm
Thickness 9.1 mm 9.2 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • Red
  • Blue
  • White
  • Coral Green
  • Poco Yellow
  • Power Black

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.71 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 720 x 1650
Aspect Ratio 20:9 21:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 81.8 % 82 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 268 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A N/A
Typical Brightness N/A 400 nits
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 133.26 mAh/in²
Battery Density 44.09 mAh/cm³ 50.2 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 6000 mAh
NFC Support No Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SDM450 Snapdragon 450 (14 nm) JLQ JR510 (11 nm)
CPU Octa-core 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 506 Mali-G57 MC1

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 10 11
Maximum OS Version 12

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

Design

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A02sXiaomi Poco C40Practical Impact
Dimensions164.2 × 75.9 × 9.1 mm169.6 × 76.6 × 9.2 mmThe Poco C40 is taller and slightly wider and thicker. The A02s might feel a bit more compact in the hand.
Weight196g204gThe A02s is slightly lighter, which might be noticeable during extended use, although both are relatively hefty.

Display

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A02sXiaomi Poco C40Practical Impact
Size6.5"6.71"The Poco C40 offers a larger screen, which is better for media consumption and reading, but might make the phone less convenient for one-handed use.
Resolution720x1600720x1650Both have similar HD+ resolutions, so sharpness is comparable and not very high. Text and images might lack some crispness.
PPI270268Similar pixel density; both screens will appear similarly sharp, with neither offering a significant advantage.
TechnologyPLS LCDIPS LCDIPS LCD typically offers slightly better viewing angles and color reproduction compared to PLS LCD. This could result in slightly better image quality on the Poco C40.
Refresh Rate60Hz60HzBoth have standard 60Hz refresh rates, meaning motion will appear similarly smooth on both.
Brightness0 nits0 nitsBoth phones have identical peak brightness at 0 nits. This is unusual; the true maximum brightness was not provided, and it is likely both phones have similar peak brightness.

Performance

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A02sXiaomi Poco C40Practical Impact
ChipsetQualcomm SDM450 (14nm)JLQ JR510 (11nm)The Poco C40's chipset is newer and manufactured with a smaller node, which generally leads to better performance and energy efficiency.
AnTuTu Score74,800128,944The Poco C40 scores significantly higher in benchmarks, indicating it will provide a much smoother and faster user experience, especially for multitasking and gaming.
GPUAdreno 506Mali-G57 MC1The Poco C40's GPU should provide better graphics performance, which impacts gaming, and video rendering.

Camera

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A02sXiaomi Poco C40Practical Impact
Standard Camera13MP, f/1.813MP, f/1.8Both phones have similar main cameras, which should produce comparable image quality in good lighting.
Selfie Camera5MP, f/2.25MP, f/2.2Both phones have identical selfie camera specs, likely yielding similar results for selfies and video calls.
Portrait Camera2MP, f/2.42MP, f/2.4, 1/5" Sensor, OV02B10, 1.75µm pixelsBoth have a 2MP depth sensor for portrait mode; the Poco C40 has a slightly better sensor, potentially improving portrait mode quality.
Macro Lens2MP, f/2.4NoneThe A02s has a dedicated macro lens, useful for close-up shots, while the Poco C40 lacks this feature.
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fpsBoth can record 1080p video at 30fps, suitable for basic video recording.
Slow-motionNo, 30 fpsYes, 120 fpsThe Poco C40 can record slow-motion video, while the A02s cannot. This is a significant advantage for creative video capture.
FeaturesDigital zoom, Triple camera, Autofocus, Touch focus, PDAF, Geotagging, Panorama, HDR, Face detection, ISO settings, Scene mode, Self-timerDigital zoom, Dual camera, Digital image stabilization, Autofocus, Touch focus, Geotagging, HDR, Face detection, White balance settings, ISO settings, Exposure compensation, Scene mode, Self-timerThe A02s has Phase Detection Autofocus (PDAF) and Panorama while the Poco C40 has digital image stabilization, White Balance settings and Exposure compensation. Each camera has a slightly different focus.

Battery

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A02sXiaomi Poco C40Practical Impact
Capacity5000mAh6000mAhThe Poco C40 has a significantly larger battery, likely resulting in much longer battery life. This is good for users who do not have access to frequent charging.
Charging15W18WThe Poco C40 supports slightly faster charging, which, combined with its larger battery, reduces the time spent charging.
FeaturesNon-removableReverse charging, Non-removable, 10W Charger in the BoxThe Poco C40 can act as a power bank for other devices, and comes with a charger, while A02s may not include the charger.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Samsung Galaxy A02s Advantages:

  • Dedicated Macro Lens: Allows for close-up photography, which the Poco C40 lacks.
  • Phase Detection Autofocus (PDAF): Offers potentially faster and more reliable autofocus for its main camera.
  • Slightly Lighter: May feel more comfortable to hold for extended periods

Xiaomi Poco C40 Advantages:

  • Superior Performance: The JLQ JR510 chipset offers much better performance than the Snapdragon 450, leading to faster app loading and smoother multitasking.
  • Larger Battery: The 6000mAh battery provides longer battery life, reducing the need for frequent charging.
  • Faster Charging: 18W fast charging means less time spent tethered to a charger.
  • IPS LCD Display: Offers slightly better color reproduction and viewing angles.
  • Slow-motion Video: Capability to capture slow-motion video at 120fps, which is lacking in the A02s.
  • Newer Bluetooth: Supports Bluetooth 5.0 which may improve range and efficiency.
  • Better Screen Protection: Corning Gorilla Glass 3 for superior durability.
  • Fingerprint Sensor: Offers additional biometric security.
  • Reverse Charging: Can be used as a power bank to charge other devices.

Trade-offs:

  • Poco C40 is Larger and Heavier: This can be less convenient for some users.
  • A02s lacks many modern features: Such as slow-motion video recording, fingerprint sensor, and superior screen protection, making it feel outdated compared to the Poco C40.
  • A02s offers a dedicated macro lens: Though often not that important, this is a feature Poco C40 lacks.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Samsung Galaxy A02s Ideal User:

  • Budget-conscious users: Who need a basic smartphone with a functional camera.
  • Users who prioritize a slightly lighter and more compact design (though both phones are hefty, the A02s is slightly lighter).
  • Users who may occasionally take macro photos.

Specific Use Cases:

  • Basic web browsing and social media.
  • Occasional photography of documents or everyday scenes.
  • Users who are not bothered with the performance limitations.

Xiaomi Poco C40 Ideal User:

  • Users who prioritize performance: Those looking for a smooth and fast user experience, who are also on a tight budget.
  • Users needing long battery life: Individuals who use their phone frequently throughout the day and need to charge less.
  • Users who consume media on their phones: People who appreciate a larger, slightly better-quality display and better viewing angles.
  • Users who want extra security: Individuals looking for a smartphone with a fingerprint sensor.

Specific Use Cases:

  • Gaming and heavy app usage.
  • Extended video watching.
  • Users who need to use their device for navigation or other power-intensive activities throughout the day.
  • Creative users who want to record slow-motion videos.

Price-to-Value Ratio:

The Xiaomi Poco C40 offers a significantly better value proposition due to its superior performance, larger battery, and added features such as fingerprint sensor and better screen protection. The A02s is a more basic phone that might be a little cheaper but doesn't offer as good value.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. How important is performance? If you need fast app loading and smooth multitasking, the Poco C40 is the obvious choice. If you only plan to use the phone for basic tasks, the A02s may be acceptable.
  2. How important is battery life? If you hate having to charge your phone every day, the Poco C40's 6000mAh battery is a major advantage.
  3. Do you need a dedicated macro lens or slow-motion video? If so, you'll have to pick one of the phones - the A02s has macro, while the Poco C40 has slow-motion video recording.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: Basic User on a Tight Budget: If your budget is extremely limited and you only need a basic phone, the Samsung Galaxy A02s could suffice, but the Poco C40 gives you much more for the price.
  • Scenario 2: Power User on a Budget: If you need a phone that can handle games and multitasking, the Xiaomi Poco C40 is the clear choice.
  • Scenario 3: Long Battery Life Priority: If battery life is your main concern, the Poco C40's larger battery makes it the better option.

Personal Choice

If I were choosing between these two phones, I would choose the Xiaomi Poco C40. The significant performance advantage, larger battery, slightly better display, better screen protection, inclusion of a fingerprint sensor, and features like slow-motion video and reverse charging make it a far more compelling option overall. While the Samsung Galaxy A02s has a dedicated macro lens, this is a niche feature that does not outweigh the multiple advantages the Poco C40 offers. The Poco C40 delivers more value for the money and provides a better user experience.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.