Samsung Galaxy A02 vs Nokia G11 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Nokia G11
Nokia G11
Nokia

General

Launch Date January 27, 2021 March 24, 2022
Release Year 2021 2022

Physical

Volume 113.27 cm³ 106.19 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.16 "/g 3.44 "/g
Weight 206 g 189 g
Height 164 mm 164.6 mm
Width 75.9 mm 75.9 mm
Thickness 9.1 mm 8.5 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • Blue
  • Charcoal
  • Ice

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.5 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 720 x 1600
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 81.9 % 81.6 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 270 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 119.53 mAh/in²
Battery Density 44.14 mAh/cm³ 47.56 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5050 mAh
NFC Support No Yes
Chipset Mediatek MT6739W (28 nm) Unisoc T606 (12 nm)
CPU Quad-core 1.5 GHz Cortex-A53 Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU PowerVR GE8100 Mali-G57 MP1

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features microUSB 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 10 11
Maximum OS Version 11

Comparison Summary

Smartphone Comparison: Samsung Galaxy A02 vs. Nokia G11

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A02Nokia G11Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions164 × 75.9 × 9.1 mm164.6 × 75.9 × 8.5 mmNokia G11 is slightly thinner and may feel more comfortable in hand. The A02 is slightly thicker.
Weight206g189gNokia G11 is noticeably lighter, making it more comfortable for extended use and easier to carry around.
Display
Size6.5"6.5"Both phones offer the same screen size suitable for media consumption and general usage.
Resolution720 x 1600720 x 1600Both phones offer identical screen clarity suitable for basic tasks, but not the sharpest for detailed content viewing.
PPI270270Similar pixel density means both will look equally sharp to the naked eye
TechnologyPLS LCDIPS LCDNokia G11's IPS LCD generally offers better viewing angles and color reproduction compared to PLS LCD, enhancing overall viewing experience.
Refresh Rate60Hz90HzNokia G11's 90Hz display offers a smoother scrolling and animation experience, making the phone feel more responsive.
Brightness0 nits0 nitsBoth phones have identical brightness (0 nits) which indicates that they might not be suitable for use in direct sunlight
Performance
ChipsetMediatek MT6739W (28 nm)Unisoc T606 (12 nm)Nokia G11's newer and more efficient chipset (12nm vs 28nm) leads to better performance, less heat, and potentially better battery life.
AnTuTu Score50,774253,300Nokia G11 scores significantly higher in benchmarks, translating to smoother app loading, multitasking, and gaming.
GPUPowerVR GE8100Mali-G57 MP1Nokia G11's GPU provides better graphics performance, allowing for smoother gaming and better performance in graphic-intensive applications.
Camera
Main Camera13MP, f/1.913MP, f/1.8Nokia G11's slightly wider aperture may allow better low-light performance and slightly more shallow depth of field
Selfie Camera5MP, f/2.08MP, f/2.0Nokia G11's higher-resolution selfie camera will generally offer better image quality for selfies and video calls
Portrait Mode (Depth)Not Available2MP, f/2.4Nokia G11 allows for better portraits with blurred backgrounds due to the depth sensor. The Samsung Galaxy A02 does not offer this.
Macro Lens2MP, f/2.42MP, f/2.4Both phones offer similar macro lens performance for close-up shots.
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fpsBoth offer standard video recording quality suitable for casual usage.
Camera FeaturesDigital zoom, Dual camera, Autofocus, etc.Digital zoom, Triple camera, Autofocus, etc., Front FlashNokia G11 includes a front flash and triple camera system, while the A02 has a dual camera setup.
Battery
Capacity5000mAh5050mAhBoth phones have similar battery capacity which means the expected battery life should be comparable
Charging7.5W Fast Charging18W Fast ChargingNokia G11 charges significantly faster, allowing for less waiting time to recharge.
Software
OSAndroid 10, upgradeable to 11Android 11Nokia G11 has a newer OS out of the box; both have similar level of software updates
Connectivity
WiFi802.11b/g/n, Wi-Fi Hotspot802.11a/b/g/n/ac, Dual band, Wi-Fi Hotspot, Wi-Fi DisplayNokia G11 supports dual-band Wi-Fi and Wi-Fi display capabilities
Bluetooth4.2 LE5.0 LENokia G11 has a newer Bluetooth version offering faster and more stable connections.
GPSGPS, A-GPS, GLONASSGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, GalileoNokia G11 supports more satellite systems for improved location accuracy.
SIMDual SIM Dual StandbyDual SIM Dual StandbyBoth phones have the same dual-SIM functionality
Storage
Internal32 GB or 64 GB32 GB or 64 GBBoth offer the same internal storage options.
RAM2 GB, 3 GB, or 4 GB3 GB or 4 GBNokia G11 offers slightly higher base RAM option than the A02.
ExpandableNo expandableNo expandableNeither phone offers expandable storage via microSD.
Audio
QualityDolby Atmos2 microphonesSamsung A02 has Dolby Atmos which offers better audio quality; Nokia has a two microphone configuration which allows for better call quality.
Security
FeaturesBasic securitySide-mounted fingerprint sensorNokia G11 has a convenient fingerprint sensor for quick and secure unlocking.
Sensors
SensorsProximity, AccelerometerFingerprint, Proximity, AccelerometerNokia G11 has fingerprint sensor and overall better sensor configuration.
Build
Screen ProtectionUnknownUnknownScreen protection details are not available for either phone.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Samsung Galaxy A02 Advantages:

  • Dolby Atmos: Offers enhanced spatial audio which might appeal to users who consume multimedia on their phones.
  • Slightly Larger Selection of RAM options: Comes in 2GB, 3GB, and 4GB variants (although Nokia has 3GB and 4GB options, too).

Nokia G11 Advantages:

  • Significantly Better Performance: The Unisoc T606 chipset provides a much higher benchmark score, resulting in smoother and faster performance.
  • Smoother Display: 90Hz refresh rate for a more fluid user experience, especially noticeable while scrolling.
  • Superior Camera: Better selfie camera, depth sensor for portrait mode, and wider aperture main camera for potentially better low-light images.
  • Faster Charging: The 18W fast charging allows the phone to recharge quicker, a definite advantage.
  • Better Connectivity: Supports dual-band WiFi, newer Bluetooth version and more satellite navigation systems.
  • Enhanced Security: Includes a side-mounted fingerprint sensor for added convenience and security.
  • Newer OS: Comes with Android 11 out of the box.
  • Lighter: Making it comfortable to use for extended periods

Trade-offs:

  • Samsung Galaxy A02: The main trade-off is significantly inferior performance compared to the Nokia G11. It's also heavier and has an older display technology.
  • Nokia G11: While generally superior, it lacks the Dolby Atmos audio feature of the A02.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Samsung Galaxy A02:

  • Ideal User: Extremely budget-conscious users who prioritize basic functionality and are not demanding in terms of performance.
  • Use Cases: Basic communication, web browsing, light social media use, and media consumption with an enhanced audio experience if the user values that feature.
  • Price-to-Value: The price is likely the primary draw, making it a good choice for those on a very tight budget.

Nokia G11:

  • Ideal User: Users seeking a smooth experience, good performance for day-to-day tasks, decent camera capabilities, and fast charging in a budget phone.
  • Use Cases: Everyday tasks, multitasking, smoother social media browsing, casual gaming, capturing better photos, and users who benefit from a fingerprint sensor for security and quicker access.
  • Price-to-Value: The Nokia G11 provides significantly more value for the price due to its superior performance, display, camera, faster charging, and better security.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is my budget? If the budget is extremely tight, the Samsung A02 may seem like the only option, however, users should consider the long term performance and the fact that they might be using this phone for 2 years.
  2. How important is smooth performance and speed? If performance is critical for multitasking or gaming, the Nokia G11 is a clear choice.
  3. How often will I use the camera and for what purpose? If photography is important, the Nokia G11 offers a better overall camera system.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: Minimal Usage, Tight Budget: If phone use is mainly for calls and basic messaging on a very strict budget, the Samsung Galaxy A02 will do the job.
  • Scenario 2: Everyday Usage, Moderate Budget: For average everyday use, social media, basic gaming and decent photo quality, the Nokia G11 is the better choice for a smoother and more enjoyable user experience.
  • Scenario 3: Smooth experience, Camera, and Speed Focus: For a smoother user experience, better camera, faster charging and a more secure device, the Nokia G11 is highly recommended.

My Choice:

If I had to choose between these two phones, I would pick the Nokia G11. While the Samsung Galaxy A02 might appeal to someone on an extremely tight budget, the significant performance boost, smoother display, better camera system, faster charging and added security features on the Nokia G11 makes it a much better overall phone. The 90Hz refresh rate and the much faster processor on the Nokia will provide a significantly better experience, and while the Samsung does have Dolby Atmos it isn't enough to justify choosing it over the Nokia G11. The performance difference alone makes the Nokia G11 the better option for long-term use. Additionally, the addition of a fingerprint sensor is an important benefit that I feel is a must-have in today's world.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.