Realme Note 50 vs ZTE Blade A75 4G - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date January 23, 2024 July 1, 2024
Release Year 2024 2024

Physical

Volume 102.59 cm³ 106.97 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.62 "/g 3.49 "/g
Weight 186 g 189 g
Height 167.2 mm 164.1 mm
Width 76.7 mm 75.8 mm
Thickness 8 mm 8.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Midnight Black
  • Sky Blue
  • Basalt Black
  • Aqua Green
  • Marble White

Display

Screen Size 6.74 " 6.6 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 720 x 1612
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.5 % 84.1 %
Pixel Density 260 PPI 267 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 560 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 110.07 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 48.74 mAh/cm³ 46.74 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support No Yes
Chipset Unisoc Tiger T612 (12 nm) Unisoc T606 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G57 Mali-G57 MP1

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 13
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureRealme Note 50ZTE Blade A75 4GPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions167.2 x 76.7 x 8 mm164.1 x 75.8 x 8.6 mmThe ZTE Blade A75 4G is slightly shorter and narrower, but also a bit thicker. Realme Note 50 might feel slightly more compact in hand.
Weight186g189gNegligible weight difference; both phones will feel similarly heavy in hand.
Build MaterialsNot specifiedNot specifiedCannot compare build quality and durability without this information.
Display
Size6.74"6.6"Realme Note 50 offers a slightly larger screen for more immersive content consumption.
TypeIPS LCD, 90HzIPS LCD, 90HzBoth phones use the same display technology with the same refresh rate, resulting in similar visual fluidity.
Resolution720 x 1600720 x 1612Virtually identical resolutions; sharpness will be comparable on both devices.
Peak Brightness560 nitsNot specifiedRealme Note 50's specified peak brightness should offer better visibility in direct sunlight. The lack of data for the ZTE phone makes a complete comparison impossible.
Performance
ChipsetUnisoc Tiger T612 (12nm)Unisoc T606 (12nm)Both use 12nm chipsets from Unisoc, indicating similar power efficiency. Performance differences will likely be minor based on slight CPU core clock speed variations.
CPUOcta-core (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)The Realme Note 50 has slightly faster CPU clock speeds, potentially resulting in slightly quicker app loading and multitasking, though the difference may not be noticeable in everyday use.
GPUMali-G57Mali-G57 MP1Both phones utilize the Mali-G57 GPU architecture, indicating comparable graphics performance. Minor differences might exist due to core configurations (MP1 suggests a single core on the ZTE, potentially impacting demanding gaming performance).
RAM4GB4GBSame RAM capacity indicates similar multitasking capabilities.
Storage128GB256GBZTE Blade A75 4G offers significantly more internal storage for apps, photos, and videos.
Other
Battery5000 mAh5000 mAhIdentical battery capacities suggest similar battery life, although real-world usage will depend on software optimization and user habits.
OSAndroid 13Android 13Both phones run on the same operating system, offering a similar software experience.
NFCNoYesZTE Blade A75 4G supports NFC for contactless payments and other functionalities, a feature missing in the Realme Note 50.
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 2.0Both have the same USB standard for charging and data transfer.
SensorsAccelerometer, Proximity, Compass, Fingerprint (side-mounted)Accelerometer, Proximity, Fingerprint (side-mounted)Realme Note 50 has a compass sensor, which the ZTE phone lacks. This could impact navigation accuracy.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Realme Note 50 Advantages:

  • Slightly larger display
  • Slightly faster CPU clock speeds
  • Compass sensor
  • Potentially brighter display (comparison limited by incomplete data)

ZTE Blade A75 4G Advantages:

  • Significantly more storage (256GB vs 128GB)
  • NFC functionality for contactless payments

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Realme Note 50: Suitable for users who prioritize a slightly larger screen and potentially better outdoor visibility.

ZTE Blade A75 4G: Ideal for users who require ample storage space and rely on NFC for contactless payments.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. How important is storage space? If you need lots of space for apps, photos, and videos, the ZTE Blade A75 4G is the clear winner.
  2. Do you need NFC for contactless payments? If this is a must-have feature, the ZTE Blade A75 4G is the only option.
  3. How much do you value a slightly larger screen? If a bigger display for media consumption is important, the Realme Note 50's 6.74-inch screen offers a slight advantage.

My Choice: ZTE Blade A75 4G

While the Realme Note 50 offers a marginally larger display and potentially slightly faster performance, the ZTE Blade A75 4G's advantages in storage and NFC functionality are more significant for my needs. Double the storage is a substantial benefit in the long run, and NFC is essential for convenient mobile payments. The lack of peak brightness information for the ZTE is a concern, but the inclusion of NFC and the larger storage capacity outweigh the minor benefits of the Realme Note 50 for me. The slightly smaller screen size and potential performance difference are acceptable trade-offs for the added convenience and storage provided by the ZTE Blade A75 4G.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.