Realme Narzo 50A Prime vs Realme C51 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Realme C51
Realme C51
Realme

General

Launch Date March 22, 2022 August 1, 2023
Release Year 2022 2023

Physical

Volume 100.67 cm³ 102.59 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.49 "/g 3.62 "/g
Weight 189 g 186 g
Height 164.4 mm 167.2 mm
Width 75.6 mm 76.7 mm
Thickness 8.1 mm 8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • Blue
  • Mint Green
  • Carbon Black

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.74 "
Resolution 1080 x 2408 720 x 1600
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.4 % 85.5 %
Pixel Density 400 PPI 260 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 600 nits 560 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 110.07 mAh/in²
Battery Density 49.67 mAh/cm³ 48.74 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support No Yes
Chipset Unisoc Tiger T612 (12 nm) Unisoc Tiger T612 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G57 Mali-G57

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 13
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

Realme Narzo 50A Prime vs. Realme C51: A User-Centered Comparison

Let's dive into a comparative analysis of the Realme Narzo 50A Prime and the Realme C51, focusing on how their features translate into real-world user experiences. We'll move beyond the raw numbers and explore how design choices shape the interaction with each device.

1. Design and Usability Assessment:

FeatureRealme Narzo 50A PrimeRealme C51User Experience ImpactCategory
Display6.6" IPS LCD (400 ppi)6.74" IPS LCD (260 ppi)While the C51 boasts a larger screen and a smoother 90Hz refresh rate, the Narzo 50A Prime offers sharper visuals due to higher pixel density.Interface Design
OSAndroid 11Android 13C51 provides a more modern OS experience with potential performance improvements and newer features.Interaction Flow
NFCNoYesC51 enables contactless payments and data transfer, expanding usability for tech-savvy users.Accessibility Features
Weight/Dimensions189g, 8.1mm thick186g, 8.0mm thickBoth phones are similar in weight and thinness, offering comfortable one-handed usage for most users.Design Ergonomics

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Scenario: Imagine a student using their phone for both online classes and casual gaming.

  • Narzo 50A Prime: The sharper display of the Narzo 50A Prime enhances the clarity of online lectures and provides a more immersive gaming experience. However, the absence of NFC might limit convenient payment options on campus.
  • C51: The C51's 90Hz refresh rate ensures smoother scrolling through web pages and social media, making multitasking feel more fluid. NFC allows for quick and easy payments at the cafeteria. However, the lower pixel density might make text appear less crisp during long study sessions.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

  • For a budget-conscious user: The Narzo 50A Prime offers a compelling value proposition with its sharp display and long-lasting battery.
  • For a tech-savvy individual: The C51's NFC capability, latest Android version, and smoother refresh rate might be more appealing.
  • For users with visual impairments: The Narzo 50A Prime's higher pixel density could be beneficial for reading text and navigating the interface.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework:

Both phones cater to different user priorities. The choice boils down to individual preferences and needs.

  • Prioritize Display Sharpness and Value: Narzo 50A Prime
  • Prioritize Smoothness, Modern Features, and Contactless Convenience: Realme C51

My Choice: Realme C51

While the Narzo 50A Prime offers a sharper display, I would choose the Realme C51. The combination of NFC for convenient transactions, the latest Android version for long-term software support, and the smoother 90Hz display for a more fluid user experience outweighs the slightly lower pixel density for me. As a technology communications specialist, I appreciate the forward-looking features of the C51, and I believe the overall user experience it offers is more aligned with current mobile trends and user expectations. Although the screen resolution isn't as sharp, the difference is negligible in everyday use for most individuals. The added benefits of the C51 make it a more versatile and future-proof choice.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.