Realme GT Neo2 vs Xiaomi Poco F4 GT - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date September 28, 2021 April 28, 2022
Release Year 2021 2022

Physical

Volume 111.13 cm³ 105.94 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.31 "/g 3.18 "/g
Weight 199.8 g 210 g
Height 162.9 mm 162.5 mm
Width 75.8 mm 76.7 mm
Thickness 9 mm 8.5 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Neo Black
  • Neo Blue
  • Neo Green
  • Stealth Black
  • Knight Silver
  • Cyber Yellow

Display

Screen Size 6.62 " 6.67 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.7 % 86.2 %
Pixel Density 398 PPI 395 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 800 nits
Peak Brightness 1300 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.09 mAh/in² 105.64 mAh/in²
Battery Density 44.99 mAh/cm³ 44.36 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 4700 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Adreno 650 Adreno 730

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 12
Maximum OS Version 12 13

Comparison Summary

Alright, let's break down the Realme GT Neo2 and the Xiaomi Poco F4 GT. We've got two very capable phones here, each with its own strengths and targeted at slightly different users. Let's dive in and see what makes them tick.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureRealme GT Neo2Xiaomi Poco F4 GTReal-World Implications
Design
Launch Date2021-09-282022-04-28Poco F4 GT is newer by roughly 7 months, meaning potentially more up-to-date features and software
Dimensions162.9 x 75.8 x 9 mm162.5 x 76.7 x 8.5 mmSimilar size, with the Realme slightly thicker and the Poco slightly wider, negligible in hand.
Weight199.8g210gRealme is a bit lighter, which could make a difference for extended use.
Display
Size6.62"6.67"Virtually identical screen sizes.
Resolution1080 x 24001080 x 2400Both have sharp, detailed displays.
PPI398395Almost identical pixel density; both displays appear equally sharp.
TechnologyAMOLEDAMOLEDBoth use vibrant and color-rich AMOLED technology for excellent contrast and deep blacks.
Refresh Rate120Hz120HzBoth offer smooth scrolling and animations.
Brightness1300 nits0 nitsRealme GT Neo2 significantly better for outdoor visibility, especially in bright sunlight. Poco F4 GT has no data and could be a massive drawback if you need a bright display.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 870 (7nm)Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4nm)Poco F4 GT's newer and more powerful chip results in significantly faster processing and improved gaming.
AnTuTu Score794,6431,178,365Poco F4 GT offers substantially better performance for demanding tasks and apps.
GPUAdreno 650Adreno 730Poco F4 GT's GPU offers better graphics processing for games and video editing.
Battery
Capacity5000mAh4700mAhRealme has slightly more capacity for longer usage between charges (roughly 6% more).
Charging65W Fast Charging120W Fast ChargingPoco F4 GT charges much faster (120W) for quick top-ups.
Battery TypeLi-PolymerLi-IonMinor difference; both offer similar practical performance.
Camera
Standard Lens Resolution64MP64MPBoth offer similar main sensor resolutions.
Standard Lens Aperturef/1.8f/1.73Poco F4 GT's wider aperture allows slightly more light for improved low-light performance.
Standard Lens Sensor Size1/1.72"1/1.7"Poco F4 GT slightly larger sensor size allows slightly more light for improved low-light performance.
Standard Lens Sensor ModelSamsung Bright S5KGW1Sony IMX686 Exmor RSDifferent sensors; performance likely similar for most users.
Standard Lens Pixel Size0.80 µm pixel size0.80 µm pixel sizeBoth offer similar pixel size.
Selfie Lens Resolution16MP20MPPoco F4 GT has a higher-resolution front camera.
Selfie Lens Aperturef/2.5f/2.4Poco F4 GT's wider aperture on front camera allows slightly more light.
Selfie Lens Sensor Size1/3.13"1/2"Poco F4 GT's larger sensor size on front camera allows slightly more light.
Selfie Lens Sensor ModelSony IMX471 Exmor RSSony IMX596Different sensors; performance likely similar for most users.
Selfie Lens Pixel Size1.00 µm pixel size0.80 µm pixel sizeBoth offer similar pixel size on the front camera.
Wide Angle Lens Resolution8MP8MPBoth are similar in resolution.
Wide Angle Lens Aperturef/2.3f/2.2Poco F4 GT has a slightly wider aperture.
Wide Angle Lens Sensor Size1/4"1/4"Both sensors are the same size.
Wide Angle Lens Sensor ModelHynix HI-846Omnivision OV8856Different sensor manufacturer.
Wide Angle Lens Pixel Size1.12 µm pixel size1.12 µm pixel sizeBoth offer the same pixel size.
Macro Lens Resolution2MP2MPBoth offer the same resolution for macro shots.
Macro Lens Aperturef/2.4f/2.4Both have the same aperture.
Macro Lens Sensor Size1/5"Realme GT Neo2 has a smaller sensor on the macro lens.
Macro Lens Sensor ModelOmnivision OV02B10Realme GT Neo2 has a different sensor on the macro lens.
Macro Lens Pixel Size1.75 µm pixel sizeRealme GT Neo2 offers a higher pixel size on the macro lens.
Video Recording4K @ 60fps with EIS4K @ 60fps with HDRBoth record 4K at 60fps, but Poco F4 GT supports HDR for potentially better dynamic range.
Slow-Motion Video240 fps960 fpsPoco F4 GT captures significantly faster slow-motion videos.
Software
OSAndroid 11 (upgradable to 12)Android 12 (upgradable to 13)Poco F4 GT has newer software out-of-the-box with longer support.
Connectivity
WiFiWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 6, Wi-Fi MiMOPoco F4 GT has additional Wi-Fi MiMO for better performance in congested networks.
BluetoothBluetooth 5.2 (APT-x)Bluetooth 5.2Both have the same version, but Realme GT Neo2 includes APT-x support for better Bluetooth audio quality (which is important).
GPSMore systemsFewer systemsRealme GT Neo2 has more satellite systems, offering greater accuracy, particularly in challenging environments.
Storage
Internal Storage128/256GB128/256GBBoth offer the same storage options, but neither is expandable.
RAM6/8/12GB8/12GBBoth are sufficient for smooth multitasking.
Expandable StorageNoNoNeither has expandable storage.
Audio
QualityDolby Atmos, Hi-Res, 2 MicsDolby Atmos, Hi-Res, 3 MicsPoco F4 GT's 3 microphones likely offer improved voice capture; however, the Realme's 2 mics come with noise cancellation.
Security
Featuresbasic fingerprint sensorside-mounted fingerprint sensorPoco F4 GT's side-mounted sensor is faster, more convenient.
Build Quality
Screen ProtectionUnknownCorning Gorilla Glass VictusPoco F4 GT has robust scratch protection for the display.
Sensors
SensorsmorelessRealme GT Neo2 has more sensors, which allow for better features.

2. Key Insights

Realme GT Neo2:

  • Strengths:

    • Better Display Brightness: The 1300 nits display makes it much more usable outdoors under bright sunlight. This is a massive advantage.
    • Slightly Longer Battery Life: The 5000mAh battery should provide a bit more runtime than the Poco F4 GT under comparable usage.
    • Better GPS Accuracy: The inclusion of more satellite systems makes it more reliable for navigation in challenging environments.
    • Better Bluetooth Audio: Inclusion of the APT-x codec is a plus for audiophiles.
    • More Sensors: It has more sensors than the Poco, which would be advantageous.
    • Noise Cancellation Microphone For people who require audio on the move.
  • Competitive Advantages: The biggest edge it holds is its much higher display brightness. That's huge for anyone who's ever struggled to see their screen outdoors. It also offers better battery life and enhanced location capabilities.

  • Trade-offs: The biggest trade-off is the older chipset, which puts it at a disadvantage in demanding tasks and gaming compared to the Poco F4 GT. The older software means it will have less software support in the future.

Xiaomi Poco F4 GT:

  • Strengths:

    • Superior Performance: The Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 chipset provides much more processing power and better graphics for a smoother experience.
    • Faster Charging: The 120W charging speed is incredibly convenient for quickly topping up the phone.
    • Newer Software: It runs on the newer Android 12 (upgradeable to 13), offering longer software support.
    • Faster Slow-Motion Video: The 960fps video recording capabilities give it an edge for capturing dynamic content.
    • Improved Build Quality: The Corning Gorilla Glass Victus offers added peace of mind for durability.
    • Better Selfies: The front facing camera has a slightly better resolution and sensor size.
  • Competitive Advantages: The Poco F4 GT wins out for raw performance, making it the better choice for gamers and power users who push their devices to the limit.

  • Trade-offs: It has less battery capacity, significantly lower display brightness, and slightly fewer satellite systems for GPS and worse Bluetooth Audio performance.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Realme GT Neo2:
    • Best for: Users who prioritize outdoor visibility, battery life, and accurate GPS navigation and who value the APT-X codec for better bluetooth sound. This phone is ideal for outdoor enthusiasts, travelers, and those who want a phone that works reliably under bright sunlight.
    • Use Cases: Outdoor photography, navigating unfamiliar areas, long days away from a charger, consuming multimedia in a variety of lighting conditions, and listening to music with Bluetooth headphones.
  • Xiaomi Poco F4 GT:
    • Best for: Gamers, power users, and tech enthusiasts who need the best performance and don't mind a slight compromise on battery capacity. If speed is your top priority, this is the phone for you.
    • Use Cases: High-intensity gaming, video editing, multitasking with resource-heavy apps, and enjoying fast charging.

4. Buying Decision Framework

Here are three practical questions to guide your decision:

  1. Do you frequently use your phone outdoors under bright sunlight?

    • If YES: The Realme GT Neo2 is the clear winner with its significantly brighter display.
    • If NO: The Poco F4 GT might suffice if performance is your focus.
  2. Is raw performance your top priority?

    • If YES: The Poco F4 GT with its Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 chip wins here.
    • If NO: The Realme GT Neo2 still offers a smooth experience.
  3. Do you need the fastest charging speeds?

    • If YES: The Poco F4 GT and its 120W charging is unmatched.
    • If NO: The Realme GT Neo2's 65W charging is still respectable.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: Outdoor enthusiast who needs a phone for navigating, taking photos, and general usage while on hikes in the mountains.
    • Recommendation: Realme GT Neo2. It's got the bright screen and the better GPS for reliable navigation and battery for long use cases.
  • Scenario 2: Avid gamer who cares the most about framerates, speed, and responsiveness.
    • Recommendation: Xiaomi Poco F4 GT. Its powerful chip and enhanced display are designed for a superior gaming experience.
  • Scenario 3: Everyday user who likes watching videos, scrolling through social media and wants a reliable phone without any specific requirements.
    • Recommendation: Realme GT Neo2 will be better thanks to better all round capabilities including the display and GPS, while the Xiaomi Poco F4 GT will provide better performance.

What I Would Choose and Why:

If I were making this decision for myself, I'd lean towards the Realme GT Neo2. Here's why:

As a tech journalist, I tend to be outdoors quite a bit and a good display that I can see under sunlight is essential. The brighter display is too big of an advantage to overlook. While the Poco F4 GT's performance is tantalizing, the older chip in the Realme GT Neo2 is still plenty capable for my everyday needs. I also prioritize having a reliable GPS for when I'm exploring new places, and the Realme wins on satellite systems. It will also offer better bluetooth audio performance. The loss of performance in the Realme is a trade-off I'm willing to make, the 65W charging is still fast, and the increase in battery life will get me through most days.

Ultimately, both are fantastic phones with their own unique strengths. Your personal use case should be the deciding factor. If you have any other questions, feel free to ask!

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.