Realme GT Neo2 vs Xiaomi Poco F4 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date September 28, 2021 June 27, 2022
Release Year 2021 2022

Physical

Volume 111.13 cm³ 95.5 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.31 "/g 3.42 "/g
Weight 199.8 g 195 g
Height 162.9 mm 163.2 mm
Width 75.8 mm 76 mm
Thickness 9 mm 7.7 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Neo Black
  • Neo Blue
  • Neo Green
  • Night Black
  • Moonlight Silver
  • Nebula Green

Display

Screen Size 6.62 " 6.67 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.7 % 86.6 %
Pixel Density 398 PPI 395 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 900 nits
Peak Brightness 1300 nits 1300 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.09 mAh/in² 101.15 mAh/in²
Battery Density 44.99 mAh/cm³ 47.12 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 4500 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585)
GPU Adreno 650 Adreno 650

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 12
Maximum OS Version 12 13

Comparison Summary

Alright, let's dive into a head-to-head comparison of the Realme GT Neo2 and the Xiaomi Poco F4. Both are mid-range powerhouses, but they have subtle differences that can make or break the deal, depending on your needs. I've broken down the specs, laid out the real-world implications, and will wrap up with who these phones are best for and what my personal choice would be.

1. Specifications Breakdown

Here’s a detailed look at how these two phones stack up, focusing on what really matters to the user:

FeatureRealme GT Neo2Xiaomi Poco F4Real-World Implications
Design
Dimensions162.9 x 75.8 x 9 mm163.2 x 76 x 7.7 mmThe Poco F4 is slightly taller and wider, but noticeably thinner, making it feel more sleek. The Realme GT Neo2 is slightly bulkier.
Weight199.8g195gBoth phones are virtually identical in weight.
BuildStandardStandardStandard build, no folding capabilities for either phone.
Screen ProtectionUnknownCorning Gorilla Glass 5Poco F4 has the advantage of the Gorilla Glass 5 for better screen durability.
Display
Size6.62"6.67"Very similar screen size. A marginal 0.05" difference is unlikely to be noticed.
Resolution1080 x 24001080 x 2400Sharp and clear visuals on both devices.
PPI398395Excellent pixel density on both; images are crisp and detailed.
TechnologyAMOLEDAMOLEDVibrant colors and deep blacks, perfect for media consumption.
Refresh Rate120Hz120HzSmooth scrolling and animations. Great for gaming and a fluid user experience.
Brightness1300 nits1300 nitsExcellent visibility even in bright sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 870 5GSnapdragon 870 5GBoth phones offer flagship-level performance for demanding games and apps.
AnTuTu Score794,643861,200Poco F4 will show slightly faster load times and better overall snappiness.
GPUAdreno 650Adreno 650Identical graphics processing power, ensuring similar gaming performance.
Camera
Main Camera64MP, f/1.8, 1/1.72"64MP, f/1.79, 1/2"Realme GT Neo2 has a larger sensor for more light, but Poco F4 has a wider aperture; may offer slightly better low-light capabilities on the Realme, and slightly better background blur on the Poco.
Selfie Camera16MP, f/2.5, 1/3.13"20MP, f/2.4, 1/2"Poco F4 has a higher resolution, wider aperture and larger sensor; likely to capture more detail and perform better in low-light.
Wide Angle8MP, f/2.3, 1/4"8MP, f/2.2, 1/4"Poco F4 has a slightly wider aperture for slightly better low-light performance.
Macro2MP, f/2.4, 1/5"2MP, f/2.4, 1/5"Both offer similar macro capabilities with same aperture and sensor size; not a highlight on either.
Video4K@60fps with EIS4K@60fpsBoth record excellent quality videos, but Realme has EIS and Xiaomi has OIS (more details in table below)
Video StabilizationNoYesRealme GT Neo2 relies on digital stabilization while Xiaomi Poco F4 offers Optical Stabilization, which is generally better.
Camera FeaturesUIS, UIS MaxOIS, Manual FocusRealme's unique UIS and UIS Max may help for very active recording, but overall, the OIS and Manual focus of the Poco F4 offer a better set of features for photos and videos.
Battery Life
Capacity5000mAh4500mAhRealme GT Neo2 should offer longer battery life on a single charge.
Charging65W67WBoth phones charge very quickly. The Poco F4 is only marginally faster.
Battery TypeLi-PolymerLi-Ion PolymerBoth offer similar battery performance.
Software
OSAndroid 11, upgradable to 12Android 12, upgradable to 13Poco F4 starts with the latest Android and has one more OS update guaranteed; better long term software support.
Connectivity
WiFiWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 6, Wi-Fi MIMOPoco F4 additionally supports: Wi-Fi MiMO, offering potentially more stable and faster wireless connectivity.
BluetoothBT 5.2, AptXBT 5.2Realme supports AptX for higher quality Bluetooth audio.
GPSGPS (L1+L5)GPS (L1+L5)Realme has additional support for GPS only.
Storage
Internal128/256 GB128/256 GBAmple storage for most users, no expandable storage on either.
RAM6/8/12 GB6/8/12 GBSufficient RAM for smooth multitasking and gaming.
ExpandableNoNoNeither device supports expandable storage.
Audio
QualityDolby Atmos, Hi-Res, Noise CancellationDolby Atmos, Hi-ResRealme has the edge with a dedicated noise cancellation microphone.
Security
BiometricsFingerprintSide-mounted FingerprintThe Poco F4's side-mounted fingerprint scanner is generally more convenient.
Sensors
SensorsProximity, GeomagneticCompass, Ultrasonic proximity virtualBoth phones offer all the necessary sensors for good smartphone experiences.

2. Key Insights

Realme GT Neo2 Strengths:

  • Larger Battery: The 5000mAh battery will generally offer longer screen-on time.
  • Main Camera Sensor: The larger main camera sensor on the GT Neo2 allows for better light capture, which might be an advantage in low light situations.
  • Audio Edge: Realme has a dedicated noise cancellation microphone, which should result in better audio clarity in calls.

Xiaomi Poco F4 Strengths:

  • Better Performance: Slightly higher AnTuTu score, indicating marginally better performance.
  • Screen Protection: Corning Gorilla Glass 5 for superior screen durability.
  • Camera Features: The Xiaomi has a higher resolution, wider aperture and larger sensor selfie camera, while also having OIS and Manual Focus for better photos and videos.
  • Software Advantage: Comes with a more recent version of Android out of the box.
  • Connectivity Edge: Wi-Fi MiMO support for potentially more stable and faster wireless connectivity.
  • Biometrics: Side-mounted fingerprint sensor for easy and convenient access.

Trade-offs:

  • The Realme GT Neo2 is slightly bulkier than the sleek Poco F4, especially its thickness.
  • The Realme GT Neo2 runs on an older version of Android.
  • The Xiaomi Poco F4 has a smaller battery, and might not last as long on a single charge compared to the Realme GT Neo2.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

Realme GT Neo2:

  • Power Users: Users who prioritize battery life, and spend a lot of time away from an outlet.
  • Mobile Photographers: Users who need excellent low-light capabilities in the main camera, and want clear calls.

Xiaomi Poco F4:

  • Mobile Gamers/Performance Focused Users: Those who prioritize peak performance and a smooth overall experience.
  • Multimedia Enthusiasts: Users who consume a lot of content on their phones, wanting excellent screen quality, screen protection, and high-quality photos/videos.
  • Tech-Savvy Users: Those who prefer the latest OS with the latest features.
  • Style Conscious Users: Those that favor sleek designs with the security and convenience of a side mounted fingerprint reader.

4. Buying Decision Framework

Here are three practical questions to help you decide:

  1. How important is battery life to you? If you prioritize a long-lasting battery, the Realme GT Neo2 is the better pick. If you're okay with slightly shorter battery life for a sleeker phone, the Poco F4 is still a great option.
  2. Do you prefer better software support and an edge in performance? If so, the Xiaomi Poco F4, with its slightly better performance and newer OS, would suit you better.
  3. Are you looking for a more robust camera and more protection? The Poco F4 has Optical Stabilization and a larger selfie camera sensor, as well as better screen protection.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • The Traveler: If you’re frequently on the go and need a reliable battery and clear call audio, the Realme GT Neo2 is the better choice.
  • The Gamer: If you want the best performance for gaming, the Poco F4 might be the better choice, due to it's higher AnTuTu score, OIS, and side-mounted fingerprint sensor.
  • The Casual User: If you prefer the latest Android, want a more durable screen, and want to have slightly better performance, the Poco F4 is your device.

My Choice:

If I had to pick one, I'd go with the Xiaomi Poco F4. While the larger battery of the Realme is tempting, the Poco F4's slightly better performance, better long term software support, superior screen protection with Gorilla Glass 5, better camera features including Optical Image Stabilization (OIS), sleeker design, and more practical side-mounted fingerprint sensor give it the edge in my book. The newer Android and higher AnTuTu scores point to a device that will stay snappy for longer. It's a well-rounded device that caters to my general use, photography, and the occasional game with very few drawbacks, and would be my choice for an all around reliable phone.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.