Realme GT Neo 3 vs Oppo Reno12 Pro - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 30, 2022 June 18, 2024
Release Year 2022 2024

Physical

Volume 101.23 cm³ 89.39 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.56 "/g 3.72 "/g
Weight 188 g 180 g
Height 163.3 mm 161.5 mm
Width 75.6 mm 74.8 mm
Thickness 8.2 mm 7.4 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Plain Black (Asphalt Black)
  • Silverstone White (Sprint White)
  • Le Mans Blue (Nitro Blue)
  • Space Brown
  • Sunset Gold
  • Nebula Silver
  • Manish Malhotra

Display

Screen Size 6.7 " 6.7 "
Resolution 1080 x 2412 1080 x 2412
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 87.5 % 89.4 %
Pixel Density 394 PPI 394 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 1200 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 111.38 mAh/in² 111.38 mAh/in²
Battery Density 49.39 mAh/cm³ 55.93 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 8100 (5 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 7300 Energy (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.85 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G610 MC6 Mali-G615 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 14
Maximum OS Version 13 17

Comparison Summary

Let's dive into a comparative analysis of the Realme GT Neo 3 and the Oppo Reno12 Pro, focusing on the user experience rather than just specs.

1. Design and Usability Assessment

FeatureRealme GT Neo 3Oppo Reno12 ProUser Experience Impact
Interface DesignAndroid 12 (up to 13)Android 14 (up to 17)Reno12 Pro benefits from newer Android features and potentially longer software support, leading to a more up-to-date and secure user experience.
Interaction FlowStandard Android with Realme UIStandard Android with ColorOSBoth offer customizable experiences, but individual preferences for UI aesthetics and features will vary. ColorOS is known for extensive customization options.
AccessibilityStandard Android AccessibilityStandard Android AccessibilityBoth rely on Android's built-in accessibility features.
Design Ergonomics188g, 8.2mm thick180g, 7.4mm thickReno12 Pro is slightly lighter and thinner, potentially offering a more comfortable one-handed experience.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration

Scenario: Imagine a photography enthusiast, Sarah. With the GT Neo 3, Sarah can capture stunning landscapes using the 50MP Sony IMX766 sensor, benefiting from its larger pixel size for detailed low-light performance. While the Reno12 Pro also boasts a 50MP main camera, its strength lies in its versatile triple-camera system. The inclusion of a telephoto lens allows Sarah to capture distant subjects with clarity, something the GT Neo 3 lacks. The Reno12 Pro's superior video capabilities, with 4K@30fps recording with HDR, OIS, and EIS, empower Sarah to create professional-grade videos.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation

Both phones cater to a broad audience with their mid-range pricing and comprehensive feature sets. However, users prioritizing the latest software advancements and longer-term updates would lean towards the Reno12 Pro. Those seeking exceptional value and strong core performance might prefer the GT Neo 3.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework

For users who value a slim and lightweight design coupled with the latest software and more versatile camera features, the Reno12 Pro is the clear winner. If top-tier performance and a potentially lower price point are more important, the GT Neo 3 holds a strong appeal.

My Choice: Oppo Reno12 Pro

While the Realme GT Neo 3 offers impressive performance for its price, the Oppo Reno12 Pro resonates more with my design-centric approach. The lighter, thinner profile significantly enhances everyday usability. The newer Android version promises a fresher, feature-rich software experience with longer-term support. The inclusion of a telephoto lens adds significant versatility to the camera system, making it more appealing for a wider range of photographic scenarios. While the chipset on the Reno12 Pro is newer (4nm vs 5nm on the GT Neo 3) and has a higher clock speed, benchmark scores show the Dimensity 8100 to outperform the Dimensity 7300. However, for my personal use, the day-to-day performance differences would likely be negligible, and the advantages in design, software, and camera capabilities of the Reno12 Pro outweigh the slight performance edge of the GT Neo 3. Finally, the Reno12 Pro offers more future-proofing with its ability to update to Android 17.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.