Realme C67 vs ZTE Blade V60 Design - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Realme C67
Realme C67
Realme

General

Launch Date December 16, 2023 June 1, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 99.49 cm³ 106.33 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.54 "/g 3.33 "/g
Weight 190 g 198 g
Height 165.7 mm 164.2 mm
Width 76 mm 75.3 mm
Thickness 7.9 mm 8.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Sunny Oasis
  • Dark Purple
  • Champagne Gold
  • Dark Blue
  • Sunrise Violet

Display

Screen Size 6.72 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 720 x 1612
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 86.6 % 84.6 %
Pixel Density 392 PPI 267 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness 550 nits N/A
HBM Brightness 680 nits N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 110.72 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 50.26 mAh/cm³ 47.02 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support No Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm) Unisoc T606 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G57 MC2 Mali-G57 MP1

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 13
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

Let's dive into a comparative analysis of the Realme C67 and the ZTE Blade V60 Design, focusing on how their specifications translate into real-world user experiences.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureRealme C67ZTE Blade V60 DesignReal-World Implications
Design
Dimensions165.7 x 76 x 7.9 mm164.2 x 75.3 x 8.6 mmC67 slightly taller, V60 slightly thicker
Weight190g198gNegligible difference in weight
Build MaterialsNot specifiedNot specifiedDurability and premium feel remain unknown
Display
Size6.72"6.6"C67 offers a slightly larger viewing area
TypeIPS LCD, 120HzIPS LCD, 90HzC67 boasts smoother scrolling and animations
Resolution1080 x 2400720 x 1612C67 significantly sharper and more detailed
PPI Density392267C67 noticeably crisper text and images
Performance
ChipsetDimensity 6100+Unisoc T606C67 significantly faster and more powerful
CPUOcta-core (2.2 GHz)Octa-core (1.6 GHz)C67 handles demanding tasks and multitasking much better
GPUMali-G57 MC2Mali-G57 MP1C67 provides a smoother gaming experience
RAM6GB6GBComparable multitasking capabilities
Storage128GB256GBV60 offers double the storage space
Other Features
Battery5000 mAh5000 mAhComparable battery life expected
NFCNoYesV60 enables contactless payments and data transfer
OSAndroid 13Android 13Both run the latest Android version
Price RangeMediumLowC67 positioned for a more demanding user, V60 for budget-conscious

2. Key Insights

The Realme C67 clearly outperforms the ZTE Blade V60 Design in display quality and processing power. Its 120Hz refresh rate, higher resolution, and powerful Dimensity chipset deliver a significantly smoother and more responsive user experience. The V60 counters with double the storage and NFC functionality, features often absent in budget-friendly devices.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

Realme C67: Suited for users who prioritize performance, a smooth display, and enjoy mobile gaming or demanding applications. Students, young professionals, and mobile content creators would appreciate the C67's capabilities.

ZTE Blade V60 Design: Ideal for budget-conscious users who primarily use their phones for basic tasks like communication, web browsing, and light media consumption. The ample storage is beneficial for storing photos and videos.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  • What is your budget? The V60 Design is a more affordable option.
  • Is performance a priority? If so, the C67 is the clear winner.
  • Do you need NFC for contactless payments? The V60 Design includes NFC.

My Choice: If I were choosing between these two, I'd opt for the Realme C67. While the ZTE Blade V60 Design offers attractive features like NFC and larger storage at a lower price point, the significantly superior display and performance of the C67 are compelling. The smoother refresh rate, sharper resolution, and faster processor would provide a noticeably better user experience in everyday tasks. I value a responsive and fluid interface, especially for tasks like web browsing, multitasking, and occasional gaming. The difference in price would be worthwhile for the long-term enjoyment and usability the C67 offers. The lack of NFC is a minor inconvenience I can work around.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.