Realme C55 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Realme C55
Realme C55
Realme

General

Launch Date March 8, 2023 January 15, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 99.3 cm³ 98.16 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.55 "/g 3.54 "/g
Weight 189.5 g 188.5 g
Height 165.6 mm 162.3 mm
Width 75.9 mm 75.6 mm
Thickness 7.9 mm 8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Sun Shower
  • Rainy Night
  • Rainforest
  • Midnight Black
  • Ice Blue
  • Mint Green
  • Ocean Sunset

Display

Screen Size 6.72 " 6.67 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 86.7 % 87.5 %
Pixel Density 392 PPI 395 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 680 nits 1800 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 110.72 mAh/in² 112.39 mAh/in²
Battery Density 50.35 mAh/cm³ 50.94 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek MT6769H Helio G88 (12 nm) Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 685 (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A53)
GPU Mali-G52 MC2 Adreno 610

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 13
Maximum OS Version 16

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureRealme C55Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4GPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)165.6 x 75.9 x 7.9162.3 x 75.6 x 8.0Redmi Note 13 slightly shorter and narrower. Negligible difference in daily use.
Weight (g)189.5188.5Virtually identical weight; no noticeable difference in hand.
Fingerprint SensorSide-mountedUnder-displayPersonal preference; both are reliable unlocking methods.
Display
Display TypeIPS LCDAMOLEDAMOLED offers deeper blacks, richer colors, and better power efficiency in dark mode. LCD can be brighter in direct sunlight.
Display Size (inches)6.726.67Negligible size difference.
Resolution (pixels)1080 x 24001080 x 2400Same resolution; sharpness is comparable on both devices.
Refresh Rate (Hz)90120120Hz provides smoother scrolling and animations, more noticeable in gaming and fast-paced content.
Peak Brightness (nits)6801800Redmi Note 13's significantly higher brightness ensures better outdoor visibility.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Helio G88 (12nm)Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 (6nm)Snapdragon 685 offers better power efficiency due to smaller node size. Performance differences likely noticeable in demanding tasks.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.0 GHz A75 & 6x1.8 GHz A55)Octa-core (4x2.8 GHz A73 & 4x1.9 GHz A53)Redmi Note 13 has faster and more powerful CPU cores, leading to better performance in multitasking and demanding apps.
GPUMali-G52 MC2Adreno 610Adreno 610 generally provides better gaming performance compared to Mali-G52 MC2.
RAM (GB)6/86/8/12More RAM options available for Redmi Note 13, allowing for better multitasking.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)64108Redmi Note 13's 108MP sensor potentially offers higher resolution and detail, particularly in good lighting.
Selfie Camera (MP)816Redmi Note 13 has a significantly higher resolution selfie camera, potentially capturing more detailed selfies.
Video Recording1080p@30/60fps1080p@30fpsRealme C55 offers 60fps recording for smoother video. No 4K recording on either device.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005000Same battery capacity; real-world battery life will depend on software optimization and usage patterns.
Fast Charging (W)3333Both phones offer the same fast charging speed.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Realme C55 Advantages:

  • Higher video frame rate: Offers 1080p@60fps recording for smoother videos.
  • Potentially lower price: Depending on configuration and region.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Advantages:

  • Superior Display: AMOLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate and significantly higher peak brightness. Provides smoother visuals and better outdoor visibility.
  • More Powerful Performance: Snapdragon 685 chip and more powerful CPU/GPU configuration delivers better overall performance for demanding tasks and gaming.
  • Higher Resolution Cameras: 108MP main camera and 16MP selfie camera likely produce more detailed images.
  • More RAM Options: Offers configurations with up to 12GB of RAM for smoother multitasking.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Realme C55: Budget-conscious users prioritizing basic functionality and smooth video recording. Suitable for casual usage, social media, and light gaming.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G: Users seeking a well-rounded device with a great display, good performance, and capable cameras. Suitable for multimedia consumption, mobile gaming, and photography enthusiasts.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Realme C55 is generally more affordable.
  2. How important is display quality? The Redmi Note 13's AMOLED display is a significant upgrade.
  3. What are your performance needs? The Redmi Note 13 offers significantly better performance for demanding tasks and gaming.

My Choice: Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G

While the Realme C55 offers a good value proposition for its price, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G offers a significantly better overall package. The AMOLED display with 120Hz is a major differentiator, providing a far superior visual experience. The improved performance of the Snapdragon 685, coupled with more RAM options, ensures smoother multitasking and better gaming capabilities. Although the Realme C55 offers 60fps video recording, the overall advantages of the Redmi Note 13, including the superior camera hardware, outweigh this single benefit. The slight price difference is justifiable for the substantial upgrades offered by the Redmi Note 13.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.