Realme C55 vs Xiaomi Redmi 13 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Realme C55
Realme C55
Realme

General

Launch Date March 8, 2023 June 3, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 99.3 cm³ 106.77 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.55 "/g 3.31 "/g
Weight 189.5 g 205 g
Height 165.6 mm 168.6 mm
Width 75.9 mm 76.3 mm
Thickness 7.9 mm 8.3 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Sun Shower
  • Rainy Night
  • Rainforest
  • Midnight Black
  • Pink
  • Ocean Blue
  • Sandy Gold

Display

Screen Size 6.72 " 6.79 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2460
Aspect Ratio 20:9 21:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 86.7 % 85.1 %
Pixel Density 392 PPI 396 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 550 nits
Peak Brightness 680 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 110.72 mAh/in² 109.10 mAh/in²
Battery Density 50.35 mAh/cm³ 47.11 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5030 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek MT6769H Helio G88 (12 nm) Mediatek Helio G91 Ultra (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G52 MC2 Mali-G52 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 N/A
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureRealme C55Xiaomi Redmi 13Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)165.6 x 75.9 x 7.9168.6 x 76.3 x 8.3Redmi 13 slightly larger and thicker. Negligible difference in everyday use.
Weight (g)189.5205C55 noticeably lighter, reducing hand fatigue during extended use.
Display
Size (inches)6.726.79Redmi 13 marginally larger; minimal difference in viewable content.
Resolution (px)1080 x 24001080 x 2460Virtually identical pixel density, resulting in similar sharpness.
TypeIPS LCD, 90HzIPS LCD, 90HzBoth offer smooth scrolling and animations due to 90Hz refresh rate. Redmi 13 uses LTPS technology, potentially offering slightly better color reproduction and viewing angles.
Peak Brightness680 nitsNot specifiedC55's higher peak brightness ensures better visibility in sunlight. Unable to compare without Redmi 13's peak brightness value.
Performance
ChipsetHelio G88 (12nm)Helio G91 Ultra (12nm)G91 Ultra should offer slightly improved performance in demanding tasks and gaming due to higher clock speeds (though frequency for G91 Ultra not provided for GPU comparison).
CPUOcta-core (2x2.0 GHz...)Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz...)Similar CPU configurations; real-world performance differences might be minimal.
GPUMali-G52 MC2Mali-G52 MC2Same GPU, but performance can differ due to clock speed variations. Redmi 13 GPU frequency of 850MHz suggests potentially lower graphics performance than C55.
RAM6/8GB6/8GBBoth offer ample RAM for multitasking; performance differences depend on specific configuration (e.g., 6GB vs. 8GB).
Camera
Main Camera64MP108MPRedmi 13's higher resolution potentially offers more detail in photos, but image quality depends on sensor size and processing.
Selfie Camera8MP13MPRedmi 13 likely produces better selfie photos due to higher resolution.
Video1080p@30/60fps1080p@30fpsC55 offers 60fps recording for smoother videos.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005030Negligible difference in battery capacity.
Charging33W Fast Charging33W Fast ChargingSimilar charging speeds.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Realme C55 Advantages:

  • Lighter and more comfortable to hold.
  • Brighter display for better outdoor visibility.
  • 60fps video recording.

Xiaomi Redmi 13 Advantages:

  • Slightly larger display.
  • Potentially better color reproduction and viewing angles due to LTPS display technology. (though subjective and needs real world comparison)
  • Higher resolution main camera.
  • Higher resolution selfie camera.
  • Reverse charging capability.

Trade-offs:

  • Redmi 13: Potentially lower GPU performance due to lower clock speed. This might impact gaming performance.
  • C55: Lower resolution cameras. Might produce less detailed photos compared to Redmi 13.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Realme C55: Suitable for users who prioritize a lightweight phone, excellent outdoor visibility, and smooth video recording. Good for casual gaming and everyday tasks.

Xiaomi Redmi 13: Suitable for users who want a large display, potentially higher quality photos, and the convenience of reverse charging. Ideal for social media enthusiasts and those who prioritize camera quality.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. Is camera quality a top priority? If so, the Redmi 13's 108MP main camera and 13MP selfie camera are compelling.
  2. Do you frequently use your phone outdoors in bright sunlight? The C55's brighter display might be crucial.
  3. Is a lightweight and comfortable phone important? The C55's lower weight could be a deciding factor.

My Choice:

I would choose the Realme C55. While the Redmi 13 boasts a higher resolution main camera and a slightly larger display, the C55's lighter weight, brighter display, and 60fps video recording are more significant factors for my personal preferences. I value comfortable one-handed use and often use my phone outdoors, making the C55's lighter weight and brighter display particularly appealing. Additionally, the potential for lower GPU performance in the Redmi 13 is a concern. The price difference, if any, between similar configurations (e.g., 8GB/256GB) would also influence my decision, especially considering the C55 is listed as "medium price" and the Redmi 13 as "low price." Ultimately, the C55 better suits my usage patterns and priorities.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.