Realme C55 vs Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Realme C55
Realme C55
Realme

General

Launch Date March 8, 2023 May 1, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 99.3 cm³ 105.57 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.55 "/g 3.27 "/g
Weight 189.5 g 204 g
Height 165.6 mm 162.8 mm
Width 75.9 mm 75.4 mm
Thickness 7.9 mm 8.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Sun Shower
  • Rainy Night
  • Rainforest
  • Black
  • White

Display

Screen Size 6.72 " 6.67 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1440 x 3200
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 86.7 % 87.5 %
Pixel Density 392 PPI 526 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 500 nits
HBM Brightness N/A 1000 nits
Peak Brightness 680 nits 1400 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 110.72 mAh/in² 115.98 mAh/in²
Battery Density 50.35 mAh/cm³ 48.88 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5160 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek MT6769H Helio G88 (12 nm) Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Mali-G52 MC2 Adreno 730

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 13
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureRealme C55Xiaomi Poco F5 ProPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)165.6 x 75.9 x 7.9162.8 x 75.4 x 8.6Poco F5 Pro is slightly shorter and narrower, but thicker. Negligible difference in everyday use.
Weight (g)189.5204Realme C55 is noticeably lighter, reducing hand fatigue during extended use.
Build MaterialNot specifiedNot specifiedCannot compare build quality and durability without material information.
Display
Display TypeIPS LCDAMOLEDPoco F5 Pro offers deeper blacks, more vibrant colors, and better power efficiency due to AMOLED technology.
Display Size (inches)6.726.67Negligible size difference. Both offer large screens suitable for media consumption.
Resolution1080 x 24001440 x 3200Poco F5 Pro has a significantly sharper display with higher pixel density (526 ppi vs 392 ppi), resulting in crisper text and images.
Refresh Rate (Hz)90120Poco F5 Pro provides smoother scrolling and animations thanks to the higher refresh rate.
Peak Brightness (nits)6801400Poco F5 Pro offers much better visibility in bright sunlight.
HDR SupportNoHDR10+, Dolby VisionPoco F5 Pro supports HDR content, resulting in a significantly improved viewing experience with compatible videos.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Helio G88 (12nm)Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm)Poco F5 Pro boasts a vastly more powerful processor, enabling significantly faster performance in demanding tasks and gaming.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510)The superior architecture and clock speeds of the Poco F5 Pro's CPU translate to a much smoother and responsive user experience.
GPUMali-G52 MC2Adreno 730Poco F5 Pro offers significantly better graphics performance for gaming and visually intensive applications.
RAM6GB/8GB8GB/12GBPoco F5 Pro offers more RAM in its base configuration, allowing for better multitasking and smoother performance with multiple apps open.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)6464While both have the same resolution, the sensor and image processing capabilities likely differ, impacting overall image quality. More details are needed for in-depth comparison.
Video Recording1080p@60fps8K@24fpsPoco F5 Pro offers significantly higher resolution video recording capabilities.
Optical Image StabilizationNoYesPoco F5 Pro will produce more stable videos and potentially better low-light photos thanks to OIS.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005160Negligible difference in battery capacity. Real-world battery life will depend on usage and optimization.
Fast Charging (W)3367Poco F5 Pro charges significantly faster.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Realme C55 Advantages:

  • Lighter Weight: More comfortable for extended use.
  • Lower Price: Offers a more budget-friendly option (based on provided price range).

Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro Advantages:

  • Significantly Superior Performance: Handles demanding tasks and gaming with ease.
  • Higher Quality Display: Sharper, brighter, and more vibrant with HDR support.
  • Faster Charging: Minimizes downtime.
  • Better Camera Features: OIS for stable videos and potentially better low-light performance; higher resolution video recording.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Realme C55: Suitable for budget-conscious users who prioritize basic smartphone functionality – calling, texting, social media browsing, and light gaming.

Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro: Ideal for users who demand high performance for gaming, content creation, multitasking, and consuming high-quality media.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions:

  1. What is your budget? The Realme C55 is significantly more affordable.
  2. What are your primary use cases? For basic tasks, the C55 suffices. For demanding tasks and gaming, the Poco F5 Pro is necessary.
  3. How important is display quality? The Poco F5 Pro's AMOLED display is vastly superior.

My Choice: Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro

While the Realme C55 offers a budget-friendly option, the Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro provides a significantly better overall user experience. Its superior performance, stunning display, faster charging, and advanced camera features make it a clear winner. The price difference is justified by the substantial upgrade in capabilities. While I acknowledge budget constraints might make the C55 more appealing for some, the Poco F5 Pro's long-term value proposition through its powerful hardware and future-proofing makes it the superior choice for me. I prioritize a smooth and responsive experience, high-quality media consumption, and having the processing power for demanding tasks, all of which the Poco F5 Pro delivers exceptionally well.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.