Realme C55 vs Motorola Moto G14 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Realme C55
Realme C55
Realme

General

Launch Date March 8, 2023 August 8, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 99.3 cm³ 95.35 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.55 "/g 3.67 "/g
Weight 189.5 g 177 g
Height 165.6 mm 161.5 mm
Width 75.9 mm 73.8 mm
Thickness 7.9 mm 8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Sun Shower
  • Rainy Night
  • Rainforest
  • Sky Blue
  • Steel Gray
  • Butter Cream
  • Pale Lilac

Display

Screen Size 6.72 " 6.5 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 86.7 % 85.6 %
Pixel Density 392 PPI 405 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz N/A
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 680 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 110.72 mAh/in² 118.34 mAh/in²
Battery Density 50.35 mAh/cm³ 52.44 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek MT6769H Helio G88 (12 nm) Unisoc Tiger T616 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G52 MC2 Mali-G57 MP1

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 13
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureRealme C55Motorola Moto G14Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)165.6 x 75.9 x 7.9161.5 x 73.8 x 8Moto G14 is slightly smaller and may feel more comfortable in hand.
Weight (g)189.5177Moto G14 is noticeably lighter, reducing hand fatigue during extended use.
Display
Size (inches)6.726.5Realme C55 offers a slightly larger screen for more immersive media consumption.
Resolution (px)1080 x 24001080 x 2400Both have the same sharp resolution, suitable for everyday use.
Refresh Rate (Hz)90UnspecifiedRealme C55's 90Hz display provides smoother scrolling and animations compared to a standard 60Hz panel (assuming Moto G14 is 60Hz).
Panel TypeIPS LCDIPS LCDBoth use IPS LCD technology, offering good color reproduction and viewing angles.
Peak Brightness (nits)680UnspecifiedRealme C55's higher peak brightness ensures better visibility in direct sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Helio G88Unisoc Tiger T616Both chipsets offer similar performance in day-to-day tasks, but benchmarks would be needed for a definitive comparison.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)Both have similar CPU configurations, but real-world performance can vary due to optimizations.
GPUMali-G52 MC2Mali-G57 MP1Mali-G57 generally offers better graphical performance, potentially giving the Moto G14 an edge in gaming.
RAM (GB)6/84/8More RAM (8GB) on both devices enables smoother multitasking and better performance with demanding apps. However, the base Moto G14 having only 4GB might hinder performance.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)6450Realme C55 has a higher resolution main sensor, potentially capturing more detail. However, sensor size and other factors also impact image quality.
Selfie Camera (MP)88Both have the same resolution front-facing camera.
Video Recording1080p@30/60fps1080p@30fpsRealme C55 offers 60fps recording for smoother video.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005000Both have large batteries, likely providing all-day battery life.
Fast Charging (W)3315Realme C55 charges significantly faster, minimizing downtime.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Realme C55 Advantages:

  • Faster Refresh Rate Display: Smoother scrolling and animations enhance the user experience.
  • Brighter Display: Improved outdoor visibility.
  • Faster Charging: Significantly reduced charging times.
  • Higher Resolution Main Camera: Potentially better detail in photos.
  • 60fps Video Recording: Smoother video capture.

Motorola Moto G14 Advantages:

  • Lighter and More Compact: Enhanced one-hand usability and reduced fatigue.
  • Potentially Better GPU: May offer a slight advantage in gaming performance.
  • Lower Price: Offers a more budget-friendly option. (Based on provided pricing)

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Realme C55: Users who prioritize a smooth display, fast charging, and a slightly larger screen for media consumption. Suitable for mobile gamers (though GPU comparison needs benchmarks) and those who spend considerable time on their phones.

Motorola Moto G14: Budget-conscious users who value portability and comfortable one-handed use. Casual users who prioritize essential features over top-tier performance.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Moto G14 offers a more affordable option.
  2. Do you prioritize display quality and smoothness? The Realme C55 excels in this area.
  3. How important is fast charging to you? The Realme C55 offers considerably faster charging.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Limited Budget: Moto G14
  • Heavy Media Consumption: Realme C55
  • Mobile Gamer: Further GPU benchmark comparisons needed, but potentially Moto G14.
  • Fast-Paced Lifestyle: Realme C55 for quick charging.

My Choice: Realme C55

While the Moto G14 offers a compelling price point and potentially a better GPU, the Realme C55's 90Hz display, faster charging, and brighter screen are significant advantages for me. I prioritize a smooth and responsive user experience, and the faster charging significantly reduces downtime. The slightly larger screen is also a plus for media consumption. While the Moto G14 is lighter, the weight difference isn't a deal-breaker for me. The Realme C55 offers a better overall package for my needs and preferences.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.