Realme C53 vs ZTE Blade V60 Design - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Realme C53
Realme C53
Realme

General

Launch Date May 31, 2023 June 1, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 96.24 cm³ 106.33 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.7 "/g 3.33 "/g
Weight 182 g 198 g
Height 167.3 mm 164.2 mm
Width 76.7 mm 75.3 mm
Thickness 7.5 mm 8.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Champion Gold
  • Mighty Black
  • Champagne Gold
  • Dark Blue
  • Sunrise Violet

Display

Screen Size 6.74 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 720 x 1612
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.5 % 84.6 %
Pixel Density 390 PPI 267 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 560 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 110.07 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 51.95 mAh/cm³ 47.02 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support No Yes
Chipset Unisoc Tiger T612 (12 nm) Unisoc T606 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G57 Mali-G57 MP1

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 13
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureRealme C53ZTE Blade V60 DesignPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)167.3 x 76.7 x 7.5164.2 x 75.3 x 8.6The Realme C53 is slightly taller and narrower, but thinner than the ZTE. The ZTE is slightly heavier. Real-world difference likely negligible for most users.
Weight (g)182198The ZTE is a bit heavier, which might be noticeable during extended use.
Build MaterialsNot specifiedNot specifiedCannot compare build quality and durability without more information.
Display
Size (inches)6.746.6Realme offers a slightly larger screen for more immersive content consumption.
Resolution (px)1080 x 2400720 x 1612The Realme C53 has a significantly sharper display, resulting in clearer text and images. The difference will be very noticeable.
PPI390267Realme's higher pixel density will make text and images appear sharper, especially noticeable when reading or viewing photos.
Refresh Rate (Hz)9090Both offer smooth scrolling and animations thanks to the 90Hz refresh rate.
Display TypeIPS LCDIPS LCDBoth use IPS LCD technology, offering good viewing angles but potentially less vibrant colors compared to AMOLED.
Performance
ChipsetUnisoc Tiger T612Unisoc T606Both chipsets are entry-level, but the T612 in the Realme C53 is generally considered slightly more powerful, likely resulting in minor performance differences in day-to-day tasks.
CPUOcta-core (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)Realme has a slight clock speed advantage, potentially resulting in marginally faster app loading and multitasking.
GPUMali-G57Mali-G57 MP1While both use the Mali-G57, specific core configurations aren't listed, making detailed GPU comparison impossible.
RAM6GB / 8GB4GB / 6GBRealme offers higher RAM configurations, enabling better multitasking and smoother performance with multiple apps open.
Storage128GB / 256GB256GBBoth offer ample storage, but Realme provides a lower storage tier for budget-conscious buyers.
Camera
Rear Camera50MP + 2MP50MP + 2MP + 0.3MPBoth have similar primary and depth sensors. The ZTE adds a low-resolution tertiary sensor, the function of which is not specified. The practical impact of this extra sensor is unclear.
Front Camera8MP8MPSimilar front camera resolutions suggest comparable selfie quality.
Video Recording1080p@30fps1080p@30fpsBoth offer basic video recording capabilities.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005000Similar battery capacities suggest comparable battery life, but actual usage will depend on software optimization and user habits.
Other
NFCNoYesZTE Blade V60 Design supports contactless payments and data transfer via NFC, while the Realme C53 does not.
Price RangeMediumLowZTE Blade V60 Design is generally more affordable.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Realme C53 Advantages:

  • Sharper Display: Significantly higher resolution for a noticeably clearer viewing experience.
  • Slightly Better Performance: Marginally faster CPU and potentially more powerful GPU.
  • More RAM Options: Higher RAM configurations for improved multitasking.

ZTE Blade V60 Design Advantages:

  • NFC: Enables contactless payments and data transfer.
  • Lower Price: More budget-friendly option.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Realme C53: Suitable for users who prioritize display quality and performance for tasks like media consumption, gaming, and multitasking.

ZTE Blade V60 Design: Best for budget-conscious users who need a basic smartphone with NFC functionality for contactless payments.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. Is display quality a top priority? If yes, the Realme C53 is the clear winner.
  2. Is NFC essential? If yes, the ZTE Blade V60 Design is the only option.
  3. What is your budget? The ZTE Blade V60 Design offers better value for budget-conscious buyers.

My Choice: Realme C53

While the ZTE Blade V60 Design offers NFC and a lower price, the significantly superior display quality of the Realme C53 is a crucial factor for me. The sharper resolution (1080p vs 720p) makes a huge difference in everyday use, especially for media consumption, reading, and browsing. I'd be willing to pay a bit more for the improved screen and slightly better performance. The lack of NFC is a downside, but for me, it's outweighed by the significantly better display. If NFC is absolutely essential, the ZTE becomes the only viable option.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.