Realme C53 vs Motorola Razr 50 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Realme C53
Realme C53
Realme
Motorola Razr 50
Motorola Razr 50
Motorola

General

Launch Date May 31, 2023 June 25, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 96.24 cm³ 92.54 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.7 "/g 3.66 "/g
Weight 182 g 188.4 g
Height 167.3 mm 171.3 mm
Width 76.7 mm 74 mm
Thickness 7.5 mm 7.3 mm
Foldable Design No Yes
Available Colors
  • Champion Gold
  • Mighty Black
  • Koala Grey (Steel Wool)
  • Beach Sand (Pumice Stone)
  • Spritz Orange (Arabesque)

Display

Screen Size 6.74 " 6.9 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2640
Aspect Ratio 20:9 22:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.5 % 84.9 %
Pixel Density 390 PPI 413 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 560 nits 3000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 110.07 mAh/in² 88.22 mAh/in²
Battery Density 51.95 mAh/cm³ 45.39 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 4200 mAh
NFC Support No Yes
Chipset Unisoc Tiger T612 (12 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 7300X (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G57 Mali-G615 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureRealme C53Motorola Razr 50Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)167.3 x 76.7 x 7.5171.3 x 74 x 7.3Razr 50 slightly taller and narrower, both are slim. Foldable design of Razr 50 is a significant differentiator for portability.
Weight (g)182188.4Negligible weight difference.
BuildNot specifiedNot specifiedBuild materials impact durability and premium feel; information lacking for both.
Display
TypeIPS LCDFoldable LTPO AMOLEDRazr 50 offers superior contrast, colors, and potentially power efficiency due to LTPO. Foldable display enables compact storage.
Size (inches)6.746.9Razr 50 slightly larger; real-world difference minimal.
Resolution1080 x 24001080 x 2640Similar sharpness; Razr 50 slightly taller aspect ratio.
Refresh Rate (Hz)90120Razr 50 smoother scrolling and animations.
Peak Brightness (nits)5603000Razr 50 significantly brighter, crucial for outdoor visibility.
HDRNoHDR10+Razr 50 supports HDR content for richer visuals in compatible media.
Performance
ChipsetUnisoc Tiger T612 (12 nm)Mediatek Dimensity 7300X (4 nm)Razr 50's 7300X significantly more powerful and efficient due to smaller process node. Expect smoother multitasking and better gaming performance.
CPUOcta-core (2x1.8 GHz A75 & 6x1.8 GHz A55)Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz A78 & 4x2.0 GHz A55)Razr 50 has faster and more powerful CPU cores.
GPUMali-G57Mali-G615 MC2Razr 50 boasts a more powerful GPU, beneficial for gaming and graphically demanding tasks.
RAM6/8 GB8/12 GBRazr 50 offers more RAM in some variants, improving multitasking and app performance.
Camera
Main Camera50MP50MPResolution similar; sensor quality and features likely differ, details lacking.
Selfie Camera8MP32MPRazr 50's significantly higher resolution selfie camera will produce better quality photos and videos.
Video Recording1080p@30fps4K@30fpsRazr 50 capable of much higher resolution video recording.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50004200Realme C53 has larger battery capacity, potentially longer battery life. Razr 50's more efficient chipset might offset this difference. Foldable displays often consume more power.
Charging SpeedNot specifiedNot specifiedCharging speed significantly impacts usability; information lacking for both.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Realme C53 Advantages:

  • Potentially longer battery life: Larger 5000mAh battery.
  • Lower price: Significantly more affordable.

Motorola Razr 50 Advantages:

  • Significantly more powerful: Dimensity 7300X chipset and more RAM.
  • Higher quality display: Foldable LTPO AMOLED with HDR10+ and higher brightness.
  • Foldable design: Offers unique portability and form factor.
  • Better camera system: Higher resolution selfie camera and 4K video recording.
  • 5G Connectivity: Offers faster data speeds and future-proofing.
  • More updated OS: Android 14 vs Android 13

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Realme C53: Budget-conscious users prioritizing battery life and basic functionality. Suitable for:

  • Casual users primarily using social media, browsing, and communication.
  • Users seeking a large screen for media consumption.

Motorola Razr 50: Users prioritizing performance, cutting-edge technology, and a unique design. Suitable for:

  • Users who value portability and a compact form factor.
  • Power users demanding smooth multitasking and gaming performance.
  • Users who consume HDR content and require excellent display quality.
  • Users who want the latest technology and features like 5G and a foldable screen.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. Budget: How much are you willing to spend?
  2. Performance Needs: Do you need a powerful phone for demanding tasks or just basic functionality?
  3. Form Factor: Is portability and a unique design a priority?

Scenario-based Recommendations:

  • Tight Budget: Realme C53
  • Power User: Motorola Razr 50
  • Unique Design and Portability: Motorola Razr 50

My Choice: Motorola Razr 50

While the Realme C53 offers a larger battery and a lower price, the Motorola Razr 50's superior performance, stunning display, innovative foldable design, and advanced features like 5G make it the clear winner for me. The price difference is significant, but the Razr 50 offers a substantial upgrade in almost every aspect of the user experience. I value a smooth and responsive user experience, a bright and vibrant display, and the latest technology, which the Razr 50 delivers. The foldable design is a compelling bonus for its portability and unique form factor.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.