Realme C53 vs Motorola Moto G55 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Realme C53
Realme C53
Realme

General

Launch Date May 31, 2023 September 6, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 96.24 cm³ 96.6 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.7 "/g 3.63 "/g
Weight 182 g 179 g
Height 167.3 mm 161.6 mm
Width 76.7 mm 73.8 mm
Thickness 7.5 mm 8.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Champion Gold
  • Mighty Black
  • Forest Grey
  • Smoky Green
  • Twilight Purple

Display

Screen Size 6.74 " 6.49 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.5 % 85.3 %
Pixel Density 390 PPI 405 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 560 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 110.07 mAh/in² 118.71 mAh/in²
Battery Density 51.95 mAh/cm³ 51.76 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support No Yes
Chipset Unisoc Tiger T612 (12 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 7025 (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G57 IMG BXM-8-256

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureRealme C53Motorola Moto G55Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)167.3 x 76.7 x 7.5161.6 x 73.8 x 8.1Moto G55 is slightly shorter, narrower, and thicker but lighter overall. Negligible difference in hand feel.
Weight (g)182179Negligible difference in hand feel.
Display
Size (inches)6.746.49Realme C53 offers a larger screen for more immersive media consumption.
Resolution (px)1080 x 24001080 x 2400Identical resolution, but the smaller Moto G55 screen results in slightly higher pixel density (sharper image).
Refresh Rate (Hz)90120Moto G55's 120Hz display provides smoother scrolling and animations.
Display TypeIPS LCDIPS LCDBoth use IPS LCD technology, implying similar color accuracy and viewing angles.
Performance
ChipsetUnisoc Tiger T612 (12 nm)Mediatek Dimensity 7025 (6 nm)Moto G55's 6nm chipset should offer significantly better performance and power efficiency.
CPUOcta-core (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Moto G55 boasts more powerful CPU cores, translating to faster app loading, multitasking, and gaming.
GPUMali-G57IMG BXM-8-256Moto G55's GPU likely provides superior graphics performance for gaming and demanding applications. Direct comparison is difficult due to lack of specific Mali-G57 variant and frequency information for the Realme C53.
RAM (GB)6/88Moto G55 offers more RAM in the compared variant, improving multitasking and overall responsiveness.
Camera
Rear Camera (MP)50 + 250 + 8Moto G55 features a more useful 8MP ultrawide lens compared to Realme C53's 2MP depth sensor.
Front Camera (MP)816Moto G55 has a significantly better selfie camera with higher resolution.
Video Recording1080p@30fps1080p@30/60fpsMoto G55 can record smoother 60fps video.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005000Identical battery capacity, but Moto G55's more efficient chipset likely translates to longer battery life.
Other
NFCNoYesMoto G55 supports contactless payments and data transfer via NFC.
OSAndroid 13Android 14Moto G55 comes with a newer Android version, potentially offering more features and longer software support.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Realme C53 Advantages:

  • Larger Display: Offers more immersive media consumption.

Motorola Moto G55 Advantages:

  • Significantly Better Performance: Due to a more powerful and efficient chipset, CPU, and GPU.
  • Smoother Display: 120Hz refresh rate provides a more fluid user experience.
  • More Versatile Camera: Ultrawide lens offers broader photographic capabilities.
  • Higher Resolution Selfie Camera: Better for video calls and self-portraits.
  • NFC: Enables contactless payments.
  • Newer Android Version: Access to latest features and longer software updates.
  • Better Bluetooth and wider network band support This may be important for certain users

Trade-offs:

  • Price: The Moto G55 is significantly more expensive. Users need to decide if the performance and feature upgrades justify the higher cost.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Realme C53: Budget-conscious users prioritizing a large display for media consumption. Suitable for basic tasks like browsing, social media, and casual gaming.

Motorola Moto G55: Users seeking a well-rounded phone with good performance, a smooth display, and a versatile camera. Suitable for more demanding tasks, including mobile gaming and content creation.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The price difference is substantial.
  2. What are your primary use cases? Basic tasks vs. demanding applications and gaming.
  3. Which features are most important to you? Large display, performance, camera quality, NFC.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Tight Budget, Basic Usage: Realme C53
  • Balanced Needs, Moderate Budget: Consider other options in the mid-range segment that might offer better value.
  • Performance and Features Focused: Motorola Moto G55

My Choice: Motorola Moto G55

While the Realme C53 offers a larger display at a lower price, the Moto G55 provides a significantly superior overall user experience. The performance difference due to the chipset, CPU, and GPU is crucial for long-term usability. The smoother 120Hz display, more versatile camera system with an ultrawide lens, NFC functionality, and newer Android version make the Moto G55 a more future-proof and enjoyable device to use daily. While the price premium is notable, I believe the substantial improvements in performance, features, and user experience justify the higher cost in the long run.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.