Realme C53 vs Motorola Moto G54 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Realme C53
Realme C53
Realme

General

Launch Date May 31, 2023 September 5, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 96.24 cm³ 95.41 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.7 "/g 3.67 "/g
Weight 182 g 177 g
Height 167.3 mm 161.6 mm
Width 76.7 mm 73.8 mm
Thickness 7.5 mm 8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Champion Gold
  • Mighty Black
  • Midnight blue
  • Indigo blue
  • Glacier blue
  • Mint green

Display

Screen Size 6.74 " 6.5 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.5 % 85.5 %
Pixel Density 390 PPI 405 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 560 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 110.07 mAh/in² 118.34 mAh/in²
Battery Density 51.95 mAh/cm³ 52.41 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support No Yes
Chipset Unisoc Tiger T612 (12 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 7020 (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G57 IMG BXM-8-256

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 13
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureRealme C53Motorola Moto G54Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)167.3 x 76.7 x 7.5161.6 x 73.8 x 8Moto G54 is slightly smaller and may feel more comfortable in hand.
Weight (g)182177Negligible weight difference.
Display
Display Size (inches)6.746.5C53 offers a larger screen for media consumption but may be less pocketable.
Resolution (pixels)1080 x 24001080 x 2400Same resolution, but G54 has a slightly higher pixel density due to smaller size, resulting in sharper images.
Refresh Rate (Hz)90120G54's 120Hz display will feel smoother for scrolling and gaming.
Display TypeIPS LCDIPS LCDBoth use IPS LCD technology; expect good color accuracy and viewing angles but lower contrast than OLED.
Performance
ChipsetUnisoc Tiger T612 (12 nm)Mediatek Dimensity 7020 (6 nm)G54's Dimensity 7020 is significantly more powerful, offering better performance for demanding tasks and gaming. The 6nm process also suggests better power efficiency.
CPUOcta-core (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)G54 has faster and more powerful CPU cores, resulting in noticeable performance improvements.
GPUMali-G57IMG BXM-8-256G54's GPU is more capable for gaming and graphics-intensive applications.
RAM (GB)6/88/12Both offer ample RAM for multitasking, but G54's higher RAM options provide headroom for future-proofing.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)5050Megapixel count is similar, but image quality depends on sensor size and processing, which is not fully detailed here.
Selfie Camera (MP)816G54 has a significantly better selfie camera for higher resolution photos and potentially better video calls.
Video Recording1080p@30fps1080p@30/60fpsG54 offers more video recording options, including 60fps for smoother footage.
Optical StabilisationNoYesG54's optical stabilization will result in significantly smoother videos and less blurry photos in low light.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005000Similar battery capacity, but actual battery life depends on software optimization and chipset efficiency. G54's more efficient processor might provide longer battery life.
Other
NFCNoYesG54 supports contactless payments and data transfer via NFC.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Realme C53 Advantages:

  • Larger Display: Better for media consumption.

Motorola Moto G54 Advantages:

  • Significantly Better Performance: Smoother multitasking, better gaming, faster app loading.
  • Higher Refresh Rate Display: Smoother and more responsive user interface.
  • Better Cameras: Higher resolution selfie camera, optical image stabilization for photos and videos, 60fps video recording.
  • NFC: Enables contactless payments and other NFC functionalities.
  • More Powerful GPU: Better gaming experience.

Trade-offs:

  • C53: Larger display but lower performance, lacks key features like NFC.
  • G54: Smaller display but significantly better overall performance and features.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Realme C53: Budget-conscious users who prioritize a large display for media consumption and basic tasks like browsing and social media. Not suitable for demanding users or gamers.

Motorola Moto G54: Users who want a well-rounded phone with good performance, a smooth display, a capable camera system, and features like NFC. Suitable for moderate gaming, multitasking, and everyday use.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions:

  1. What is your budget? Both are mid-range, but specific pricing should be compared.
  2. What is your primary use case? (e.g., media consumption, gaming, photography)
  3. Which features are essential to you? (e.g., NFC, high refresh rate display, performance)

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Limited Budget, Basic Use: Realme C53
  • Balanced Performance and Features: Motorola Moto G54

My Choice: Motorola Moto G54

While the Realme C53 offers a larger display, the Motorola Moto G54 provides a significantly better overall package. The performance difference due to the superior processor and GPU is substantial, impacting daily usability and future-proofing. The inclusion of NFC, a higher refresh rate display, optical image stabilization, and a better selfie camera makes the G54 a more versatile and capable device. The slightly smaller display size is a minor trade-off for the substantial gains in performance and features. Even if the price is a bit higher, the G54 provides better value in the long run due to its superior capabilities and longevity.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.