Realme C51 vs ZTE Blade A75 4G - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Realme C51
Realme C51
Realme

General

Launch Date August 1, 2023 July 1, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 102.59 cm³ 106.97 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.62 "/g 3.49 "/g
Weight 186 g 189 g
Height 167.2 mm 164.1 mm
Width 76.7 mm 75.8 mm
Thickness 8 mm 8.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Mint Green
  • Carbon Black
  • Basalt Black
  • Aqua Green
  • Marble White

Display

Screen Size 6.74 " 6.6 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 720 x 1612
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.5 % 84.1 %
Pixel Density 260 PPI 267 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 560 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 110.07 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 48.74 mAh/cm³ 46.74 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Unisoc Tiger T612 (12 nm) Unisoc T606 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G57 Mali-G57 MP1

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 13
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

Realme C51 vs. ZTE Blade A75 4G: A User-Centered Comparison

Let's dive into a comparative analysis of the Realme C51 and ZTE Blade A75 4G, focusing on the user experience rather than just specs. We'll use stories and scenarios to understand how these devices fit into your life.

1. Design and Usability Assessment:

FeatureRealme C51ZTE Blade A75 4GUser Experience Impact
Interface DesignStock Android, MinimalistStock Android, likely similarMinimal differences, potentially personal preference for pre-loaded apps/themes.
Interaction Flow90Hz Refresh Rate, Smooth Scrolling90Hz Refresh Rate, Smooth ScrollingBoth offer fluid navigation, a significant positive for everyday use.
AccessibilitySide Fingerprint SensorSide Fingerprint SensorConvenient unlocking for both hands.
Design ErgonomicsLighter (186g), Slimmer (8mm)Heavier (189g), Thicker (8.6mm)C51 might feel more comfortable for extended use.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Scenario: Imagine you're a student rushing between classes, needing quick access to notes and schedules. Both phones offer a smooth 90Hz display, making scrolling through documents and apps feel incredibly responsive. However, the slightly lighter and thinner Realme C51 might be less cumbersome to carry around all day in a backpack.

Scenario: You're a photography enthusiast capturing moments on the go. Both phones offer 1080p video recording. While detailed camera comparisons aren't provided, the faster processor in the C51 (Cortex-A75 cores clocked at 1.8GHz vs 1.6GHz in the A75) might result in quicker image processing and less shutter lag – capturing fleeting moments more effectively.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

Both phones cater to a budget-conscious audience with essential features like NFC for mobile payments and a large 5000mAh battery for all-day use. The larger storage option (256GB) on the ZTE Blade A75 4G might appeal to users who store a lot of media. The Realme C51's brighter screen (560 nits peak) could be beneficial for outdoor visibility.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework:

While both phones offer similar core functionality, the Realme C51 edges out the ZTE Blade A75 4G in terms of design ergonomics and potentially processing speed. The slimmer and lighter profile, combined with a slightly faster processor, contributes to a more refined user experience. However, the A75's larger storage option is a significant advantage for media-heavy users.

My Choice: Realme C51

As Sophia Rodriguez, I prioritize the holistic user experience. The Realme C51's subtle design advantages – lighter weight, slimmer profile, and potentially quicker performance – create a more enjoyable and comfortable interaction. While the ZTE Blade A75 4G offers more storage, the C51's superior ergonomics and potentially faster processing align better with a user-centered design philosophy. The brighter screen is a bonus for readability in sunlight. For everyday use, these small differences can significantly impact user satisfaction. Ultimately, the C51 feels like a more thoughtfully designed device for the average user.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.