Realme C51 vs vivo iQOO 12 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Realme C51
Realme C51
Realme

General

Launch Date August 1, 2023 November 14, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 102.59 cm³ 100.33 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.62 "/g 3.42 "/g
Weight 186 g 198.5 g
Height 167.2 mm 163.2 mm
Width 76.7 mm 75.9 mm
Thickness 8 mm 8.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Mint Green
  • Carbon Black
  • Black
  • Red
  • White (BMW M branding)

Display

Screen Size 6.74 " 6.78 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 1260 x 2800
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.5 % 89.6 %
Pixel Density 260 PPI 453 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 144 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 1400 nits
Peak Brightness 560 nits 3000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 110.07 mAh/in² 108.77 mAh/in²
Battery Density 48.74 mAh/cm³ 49.83 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Unisoc Tiger T612 (12 nm) Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520)
GPU Mali-G57 Adreno 750

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 16

Comparison Summary

Let's dive into a comparative analysis of the Realme C51 and the vivo iQOO 12, focusing on the user experience rather than just specs.

1. Design and Usability Assessment:

FeatureRealme C51vivo iQOO 12User Experience Impact
Display6.74" IPS LCD, 90Hz6.78" LTPO AMOLED, 144Hz, HDR10+, 3000 nits peakiQOO 12 offers a significantly richer, smoother, and brighter visual experience. Outdoors, in bright sunlight, the iQOO 12 will be far superior.
Interface DesignAndroid 13 (realme UI)Android 14 (Funtouch OS)Both offer customizable Android experiences, but Android 14 on the iQOO 12 will generally have newer features and longer software support.
Interaction FlowStandard Android navigationStandard Android Navigation with potential iQOO optimizationsLikely comparable, though iQOO might offer gaming-centric enhancements.
Design ErgonomicsLightweight (186g), slim (8mm)Slightly heavier (201g), slightly thicker (8.9mm)Realme C51 might feel more comfortable for extended one-handed use due to its lighter weight.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Scenario: Imagine you're a student using your phone for both coursework and entertainment.

  • Realme C51: You can comfortably take notes in class thanks to the lightweight design. The large screen is good for reading articles, but the lower resolution might make detailed images less crisp. The battery easily lasts a full day of lectures and studying.

  • vivo iQOO 12: The vibrant AMOLED display brings your study materials and streaming videos to life. The powerful processor handles multitasking with ease, allowing you to seamlessly switch between research apps and entertainment. The high refresh rate makes scrolling through long documents and web pages incredibly smooth.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

  • Budget-conscious users: The Realme C51 is a more affordable option, providing essential smartphone features without breaking the bank.

  • Power users: The vivo iQOO 12 caters to demanding users who prioritize performance, a premium display, and advanced features. Gamers, in particular, would appreciate the higher refresh rate and powerful processor.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework:

The Realme C51 prioritizes affordability and comfortable ergonomics. Its design philosophy centers on providing a reliable everyday smartphone experience.

The vivo iQOO 12 focuses on delivering a flagship experience with top-tier performance and a stunning display. Its design caters to users who demand the best in mobile technology.

My Choice:

I would choose the vivo iQOO 12. While the Realme C51 offers excellent value, the iQOO 12's superior display, powerful processor, and longer software support make it a more compelling device for my needs. The enhanced visual experience and smoother performance are crucial for both productivity and entertainment. I prioritize a fluid, engaging interaction with my technology, and the iQOO 12 delivers on that front. While the price difference is significant, the long-term benefits of the iQOO 12, in terms of performance and longevity, outweigh the initial cost.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.