Realme C51 vs Realme C67 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Realme C51
Realme C51
Realme
Realme C67
Realme C67
Realme

General

Launch Date August 1, 2023 December 16, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 102.59 cm³ 99.49 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.62 "/g 3.54 "/g
Weight 186 g 190 g
Height 167.2 mm 165.7 mm
Width 76.7 mm 76 mm
Thickness 8 mm 7.9 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Mint Green
  • Carbon Black
  • Sunny Oasis
  • Dark Purple

Display

Screen Size 6.74 " 6.72 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.5 % 86.6 %
Pixel Density 260 PPI 392 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 550 nits
HBM Brightness N/A 680 nits
Peak Brightness 560 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 110.07 mAh/in² 110.72 mAh/in²
Battery Density 48.74 mAh/cm³ 50.26 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes No
Chipset Unisoc Tiger T612 (12 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G57 Mali-G57 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 13
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

Let's dive into a comparative analysis of the Realme C51 and Realme C67, focusing on the user experience rather than just specs.

1. Design and Usability Assessment:

FeatureRealme C51Realme C67User Experience Impact
Display6.74" IPS LCD, 90Hz, 720x16006.72" IPS LCD, 120Hz, 1080x2400C67 offers sharper visuals and smoother scrolling due to higher resolution and refresh rate, enhancing media consumption and overall fluidity.
Dimensions/Weight167.2 x 76.7 x 8mm, 186g165.7 x 76 x 7.9mm, 190gNegligible difference in hand feel; both cater to single-hand usage.
ProcessorUnisoc Tiger T612Mediatek Dimensity 6100+C67's more powerful processor translates to faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance.
RAM/Storage4GB/128GB6GB/128GBC67's extra RAM enhances multitasking and overall system responsiveness, minimizing lag.NFCYesNoC51's NFC capability provides convenient contactless payments and data transfer, a significant advantage for some users.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Imagine a student using these phones. With the C51, they can quickly share notes via NFC with a classmate. However, the C67's superior display makes viewing detailed diagrams and videos a more immersive experience. A gamer would appreciate the C67's faster processor for smoother gameplay.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

Both phones cater to budget-conscious users seeking large displays for media consumption. However, the C67's higher resolution and refresh rate benefit users with visual impairments or those who consume a lot of video content. The C51, with NFC, caters to users who prioritize contactless transactions.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework:

The C51 prioritizes practicality with NFC, while the C67 leans towards a richer multimedia experience. The choice hinges on individual priorities: convenience versus performance.

My Choice:

I would choose the Realme C67. While NFC is a useful feature, the significantly improved display and processor of the C67 create a noticeably better user experience in everyday tasks. The smoother scrolling, sharper visuals, and faster performance enhance productivity and enjoyment, outweighing the convenience of NFC for my personal needs. The slightly higher weight is a negligible trade-off for the overall performance boost. The C67 represents a more future-proof choice for long-term usability and satisfaction. It embodies a design philosophy that prioritizes a fluid and engaging user experience, which aligns with my personal values as a technology communicator.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.