Realme C51 vs Realme C61 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Realme C51
Realme C51
Realme
Realme C61
Realme C61
Realme

General

Launch Date August 1, 2023 July 25, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 102.59 cm³ 100.09 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.62 "/g 3.59 "/g
Weight 186 g 188 g
Height 167.2 mm 167.3 mm
Width 76.7 mm 76.7 mm
Thickness 8 mm 7.8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Mint Green
  • Carbon Black
  • Dark Green
  • Sparkle Gold

Display

Screen Size 6.74 " 6.74 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 720 x 1600
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.5 % 85.5 %
Pixel Density 260 PPI 260 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 450 nits
HBM Brightness N/A 560 nits
Peak Brightness 560 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 110.07 mAh/in² 110.07 mAh/in²
Battery Density 48.74 mAh/cm³ 49.96 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes No
Chipset Unisoc Tiger T612 (12 nm) Unisoc Tiger T612 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G57 Mali-G57

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 N/A
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

Let's dive into a user-centered comparison of the Realme C51 and Realme C61, moving beyond mere specs to uncover the stories these devices tell about the user experience.

1. Design and Usability Assessment:

FeatureRealme C51Realme C61User Experience Impact
Interface DesignAndroid 13Android 14C61 offers potential UI/UX improvements and newer features inherent to the updated OS.
Display6.74" IPS LCD, 90Hz, 560 nits peak6.74" IPS LCD, 90Hz, 560 nits HBMVirtually identical visual experience; both offer smooth scrolling and decent brightness.
Interaction FlowFingerprint (side-mounted)Fingerprint (side-mounted)Similar unlocking experience.
AccessibilityBasic Android accessibilityBasic Android accessibilityBoth rely on standard Android accessibility features.
Design Ergonomics186g, 8mm thick188g, 7.8mm thickC61 is marginally thinner but slightly heavier; negligible difference in hand feel for most users.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Imagine a student using either phone for online classes. Both offer a large, vibrant display with a smooth 90Hz refresh rate, making scrolling through notes and web pages enjoyable. The 5000mAh battery ensures they can attend a full day of classes without worrying about power. However, the C61, with its potentially newer Android 14 features, might offer a slightly more streamlined multitasking experience for managing various apps and assignments.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

For budget-conscious users, both phones offer excellent value. The C51 boasts NFC for contactless payments, a feature increasingly important for everyday convenience. The C61 counters with a larger base storage option (256GB) which could be crucial for users who store a lot of media. The minimal weight and dimension differences won't significantly impact users with diverse physical needs.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework:

The choice between these devices boils down to prioritizing specific needs:

  • Prioritize NFC and a slightly lower price: Realme C51
  • Prioritize larger storage and the newest Android OS: Realme C61

Both phones offer a comparable core experience centered around a large display, long-lasting battery, and smooth performance for everyday tasks.

My Choice: Realme C61

While the C51 offers NFC, I prioritize the long-term benefits of Android 14 on the C61. The potential for software updates and newer features, alongside double the base storage, makes it a more future-proof choice. The slightly heavier weight is a negligible trade-off for these advantages. In the ever-evolving landscape of mobile technology, the C61 offers a better foundation for a sustained user experience.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.