Realme C31 vs ZTE Blade A75 4G - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Realme C31
Realme C31
Realme

General

Launch Date March 31, 2022 July 1, 2024
Release Year 2022 2024

Physical

Volume 105.28 cm³ 106.97 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.3 "/g 3.49 "/g
Weight 197 g 189 g
Height 164.7 mm 164.1 mm
Width 76.1 mm 75.8 mm
Thickness 8.4 mm 8.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Light Silver
  • Dark Green
  • Basalt Black
  • Aqua Green
  • Marble White

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.6 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 720 x 1612
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 81.4 % 84.1 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 267 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 90 Hz
Typical Brightness 400 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 47.49 mAh/cm³ 46.74 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support No Yes
Chipset Unisoc Tiger T612 (12 nm) Unisoc T606 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G57 Mali-G57 MP1

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features microUSB 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 13
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

Let's dive into a user-centered comparison of the Realme C31 and the ZTE Blade A75 4G. Instead of getting bogged down in a spec sheet showdown, we'll explore how these devices translate technical features into real-world experiences.

1. Design and Usability Assessment:

FeatureRealme C31ZTE Blade A75 4GUser Experience Impact
Interface DesignAndroid 11Android 13A75 offers a more modern OS, potentially with improved UI/UX and features.
Display6.5" IPS LCD (270 ppi)6.6" IPS LCD (267 ppi)Negligible difference in screen size and sharpness. A75 boasts a smoother 90Hz refresh rate.
ConnectivitymicroUSBUSB-CA75's USB-C provides faster charging and data transfer, a significant usability advantage.
Design Ergonomics197g189gA75 is slightly lighter, potentially more comfortable for extended use.
AccessibilityFingerprint (side)Fingerprint (side), NFCA75 includes NFC for contactless payments, enhancing accessibility for certain tasks.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Scenario: Imagine a student using their phone for online classes, social media, and mobile payments.

  • Realme C31: The student might experience slower charging with the microUSB port, leading to interruptions during study sessions.
  • ZTE Blade A75 4G: The smoother 90Hz display on the A75 makes scrolling through notes and social media feeds more visually appealing. NFC enables quick and easy contactless payments at the campus bookstore.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

  • Tech-Savvy User: Might prefer the A75 for its updated OS, USB-C, and NFC.
  • Budget-Conscious User: The C31 offers core functionality at a lower price point.
  • User with Accessibility Needs: A75's NFC could be a deciding factor for easier mobile payments.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework:

While raw specifications might favor the A75 in some areas, the user experience tells a richer story. The A75 offers a more modern, convenient, and accessible user experience thanks to its updated OS, USB-C port, NFC capability, and smoother display.

My Choice: ZTE Blade A75 4G

As a technology communications specialist focused on user experience, I would choose the ZTE Blade A75 4G. Although the Realme C31 offers a solid foundation, the A75 provides a noticeable uplift in daily usability. The modern conveniences of USB-C, the smoother display, and the inclusion of NFC for contactless payments contribute to a more seamless and enjoyable mobile experience. These seemingly small features can significantly impact how users interact with their devices, making the A75 the clear winner from a user-centered perspective. While the price difference might exist, the long-term benefits and overall user satisfaction offered by the A75 make it a worthwhile investment.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.