Realme C31 vs ZTE Axon 40 Ultra - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Realme C31
Realme C31
Realme

General

Launch Date March 31, 2022 May 13, 2022
Release Year 2022 2022

Physical

Volume 105.28 cm³ 100.96 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.3 "/g 3.33 "/g
Weight 197 g 204 g
Height 164.7 mm 163.3 mm
Width 76.1 mm 73.6 mm
Thickness 8.4 mm 8.4 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Light Silver
  • Dark Green
  • Silver
  • Gold
  • Black

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.8 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 1116 x 2480
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 81.4 % 92.9 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 400 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 400 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 1500 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 108.13 mAh/in²
Battery Density 47.49 mAh/cm³ 49.53 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support No Yes
Chipset Unisoc Tiger T612 (12 nm) Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Mali-G57 Adreno 730

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 3.1
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features microUSB 2.0 USB Type-C 3.1, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 12
Maximum OS Version 13

Comparison Summary

Realme C31 vs. ZTE Axon 40 Ultra: A Tale of Two Worlds

These two phones cater to vastly different users, like characters in contrasting stories. The Realme C31 is a practical, budget-friendly companion for everyday tasks, while the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra is a high-performance flagship, designed for users who demand cutting-edge technology and a premium experience. Let's delve deeper into their contrasting narratives.

1. Design and Usability Assessment

FeatureRealme C31ZTE Axon 40 UltraUser Experience Impact
Interface DesignBasic Android 11 SkinCustom Android 12 SkinAxon offers potentially more advanced features and customization. C31 provides a clean, stock-like experience.
Interaction FlowStandard Android NavigationPotentially Enhanced Navigation with Android 12Axon may offer smoother transitions and multitasking.
Accessibility FeaturesStandard Android AccessibilityPotentially more comprehensive with Android 12Axon likely includes newer accessibility enhancements.
Design ErgonomicsPlastic Body, 197gGlass/Metal, 204gAxon feels more premium, C31 more durable and lightweight.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration

Scenario: Capturing Memories: Imagine you're at a family gathering. The C31 allows you to capture decent photos with its 13MP triple camera, sufficient for sharing on social media. However, the Axon 40 Ultra, with its triple 64MP camera system including wide-angle and telephoto lenses, lets you capture stunning, professional-grade photos and 8K videos, preserving memories in vivid detail. The difference is like taking a snapshot with a disposable camera versus a high-end DSLR.

Scenario: Daily Productivity: For everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and light gaming, the C31's Unisoc Tiger T612 processor provides adequate performance. However, the Axon 40 Ultra's Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 processor handles demanding tasks like video editing and heavy gaming with ease, offering a seamless and lag-free experience. Think of it as riding a bicycle versus driving a sports car.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation

User 1: A student on a budget: The C31 is a perfect fit, offering essential features without breaking the bank. Its long battery life and durable build are added advantages.

User 2: A tech enthusiast: The Axon 40 Ultra caters to their needs for high performance, cutting-edge features like under-display fingerprint sensor, and a premium design.

User 3: An elderly individual: Both phones might present challenges. The C31's simpler interface might be easier to learn, but larger font sizes and simplified icons would benefit both. The Axon's advanced features might be overwhelming.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework

Beyond the Specs: While the Axon 40 Ultra boasts superior specifications, the best choice depends on individual needs and priorities. The C31 prioritizes affordability and practicality, while the Axon 40 Ultra emphasizes performance and a premium experience.

Intuitive Comparison: Consider your daily phone usage, desired features, and budget. If you need a reliable phone for basic tasks, the C31 is a great option. If you crave top-tier performance and cutting-edge technology, the Axon 40 Ultra is the clear winner.

My Choice:

As Sophia Rodriguez, I would choose the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra. While the Realme C31 is a commendable device for its price point, my focus on user experience, design innovation, and pushing the boundaries of mobile technology aligns more with the Axon 40 Ultra. Its powerful processor, stunning camera system, and premium design create a holistic user experience that goes beyond basic functionality. The under-display fingerprint sensor and the potential of the custom Android 12 skin intrigues me from a design perspective. I appreciate the seamless integration of advanced features, indicating a commitment to a refined and intuitive user experience. Although it comes at a higher price, the Axon 40 Ultra represents a significant leap in mobile technology and offers a compelling narrative of innovation. It's the kind of device that inspires exploration and allows users to fully engage with the potential of mobile technology.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.