Realme C31 vs Xiaomi Redmi 12C - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Realme C31
Realme C31
Realme

General

Launch Date March 31, 2022 January 1, 2023
Release Year 2022 2023

Physical

Volume 105.28 cm³ 113.49 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.3 "/g 3.49 "/g
Weight 197 g 192 g
Height 164.7 mm 168.8 mm
Width 76.1 mm 76.4 mm
Thickness 8.4 mm 8.8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Light Silver
  • Dark Green
  • Mint Green
  • Graphite Gray
  • Ocean Blue
  • Lavender Purple

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.71 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 720 x 1650
Aspect Ratio 20:9 21:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 81.4 % 82.6 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 268 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A N/A
Typical Brightness 400 nits 500 nits
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 111.05 mAh/in²
Battery Density 47.49 mAh/cm³ 44.06 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support No Yes
Chipset Unisoc Tiger T612 (12 nm) Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G57 Mali-G52 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features microUSB 2.0 microUSB 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 12
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

Realme C31 vs. Xiaomi Redmi 12C: A User-Centered Comparison

As a technology communications specialist, my goal is to help you understand these phones not just through numbers, but through the lens of user experience. Let's delve into a narrative-driven comparison of the Realme C31 and Xiaomi Redmi 12C.

1. Design and Usability Assessment:

FeatureRealme C31Xiaomi Redmi 12CUser Experience Impact
Interface DesignAndroid 11Android 12Redmi 12C offers a potentially more modern and feature-rich interface.
Interaction FlowStandard Android navigationStandard Android navigationLikely similar, though Android 12 on the Redmi 12C might offer slight refinements.
AccessibilityFingerprint sensor, basic accessibility featuresFingerprint sensor, potential Android 12 enhancementsBoth offer basic accessibility, but Redmi 12C might have improved features due to the newer OS version.
ErgonomicsLighter (197g), slimmer (8.4mm)Slightly heavier (192g), thicker (8.8mm)Realme C31 might feel more comfortable for extended use due to its lighter and slimmer profile.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Scenario: Imagine a student needing a reliable phone for everyday tasks.

  • Realme C31: The C31's Unisoc Tiger T612 processor handles basic apps and web browsing smoothly. Its 5000mAh battery easily lasts a full day of classes and studying. The side-mounted fingerprint sensor provides quick and convenient unlocking. However, the microUSB port feels dated.

  • Xiaomi Redmi 12C: The Redmi 12C's larger 6.71-inch display provides a more immersive experience for watching videos or reading online materials. The Helio G85 processor, though slightly more powerful, offers a comparable performance for everyday tasks. NFC capability opens up possibilities for contactless payments, a modern convenience the C31 lacks. The newer Android OS provides a more up-to-date software experience.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

  • For budget-conscious users: The Redmi 12C's lower price point makes it more accessible.
  • For users prioritizing a modern OS: The Redmi 12C's Android 12 provides a more up-to-date experience.
  • For users valuing portability: The Realme C31's lighter and slimmer design might be preferred.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework:

While both phones offer decent value, the design philosophy differs. The Realme C31 prioritizes portability and essential features, while the Redmi 12C leans towards offering a larger display and modern conveniences like NFC at a lower price point.

My Choice: I would choose the Xiaomi Redmi 12C.

Reasoning: While the Realme C31 offers a slightly more comfortable physical design, the Redmi 12C's larger display, NFC functionality, and newer Android OS version contribute to a more future-proof and feature-rich user experience. The lower price point further solidifies its value proposition. The advantages of contactless payments, a more modern interface, and a larger screen outweigh the slight difference in weight and thickness, especially considering the overall value proposition. This choice reflects my prioritization of user experience, modern features, and long-term value over minor ergonomic differences.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.