Realme C31 vs Samsung Galaxy A04e - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Realme C31
Realme C31
Realme

General

Launch Date March 31, 2022 November 7, 2022
Release Year 2022 2022

Physical

Volume 105.28 cm³ 113.41 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.3 "/g 3.46 "/g
Weight 197 g 188 g
Height 164.7 mm 164.2 mm
Width 76.1 mm 75.9 mm
Thickness 8.4 mm 9.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Light Silver
  • Dark Green
  • Black
  • Light Blue
  • Copper

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.5 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 720 x 1600
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 81.4 % 81.8 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 270 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A N/A
Typical Brightness 400 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 118.34 mAh/in²
Battery Density 47.49 mAh/cm³ 44.09 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support No No
Chipset Unisoc Tiger T612 (12 nm) Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53)
GPU Mali-G57 PowerVR GE8320

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features microUSB 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 12
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

Let's dive into a user-centered comparison of the Realme C31 and the Samsung Galaxy A04e. Instead of getting bogged down in a spec sheet showdown, we'll explore how these devices translate technical capabilities into real-world experiences.

1. Design and Usability Assessment:

FeatureRealme C31Samsung Galaxy A04eUser Experience Impact
Interface DesignStock Android 11 SkinOne UI Core 4.1 (based on Android 12)Samsung offers a more customized and potentially feature-rich interface.
Interaction FlowBasic, functional navigationPotentially smoother due to newer OS versionA04e might offer a slightly more optimized user experience due to software advantages.
AccessibilityStandard Android accessibility featuresOne UI Core accessibility featuresBoth likely offer similar basic accessibility features. Deeper investigation into specific needs is crucial.
Ergonomics197g, 8.4mm thick188g, 9.1mm thickA04e is slightly lighter but thicker. Realme C31 might feel slightly more compact in hand.
Charging PortmicroUSBUSB-CA04e's USB-C offers faster charging and wider compatibility with modern accessories.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Scenario: Imagine a student using their phone for online classes, social media, and casual photography.

  • Realme C31: The large 6.5" screen provides ample space for note-taking and viewing educational content. The 5000mAh battery ensures long-lasting performance throughout the school day. However, the microUSB port might be an inconvenience when needing to borrow a charger from a friend with a newer USB-C cable.

  • Samsung Galaxy A04e: The One UI Core 4.1 interface might offer features tailored to multitasking, allowing seamless switching between learning apps and social media. While the battery capacity is the same as the Realme C31, the USB-C port allows for quicker charging during short breaks.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

Both devices cater to budget-conscious users, prioritizing essential features over premium specifications. However, users with specific accessibility needs should thoroughly research the extent of the built-in features offered by each OS version and interface. The lack of NFC on both devices limits contactless payment options.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework:

Choosing between these devices hinges on individual priorities. The Realme C31 offers a slightly more compact design, while the Samsung Galaxy A04e benefits from a newer OS, potentially smoother performance, and the modern convenience of USB-C.

My Choice: As Sophia Rodriguez, I would choose the Samsung Galaxy A04e. While the differences are subtle, the updated Android version, the potential for a smoother user experience with One UI Core, and – crucially – the inclusion of a USB-C port make it a more future-proof and user-friendly choice. In my user-centered analysis, the seemingly small convenience of USB-C significantly impacts daily charging routines and overall device compatibility, representing a thoughtful design choice that enhances the long-term user experience. The slightly lighter weight, despite being a bit thicker, also contributes to a more comfortable experience over prolonged use.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.