Realme C31 vs Motorola Razr 50 Ultra - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Realme C31
Realme C31
Realme

General

Launch Date March 31, 2022 June 25, 2024
Release Year 2022 2024

Physical

Volume 105.28 cm³ 90.05 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.3 "/g 3.65 "/g
Weight 197 g 189 g
Height 164.7 mm 171.4 mm
Width 76.1 mm 74 mm
Thickness 8.4 mm 7.1 mm
Foldable Design No Yes
Available Colors
  • Light Silver
  • Dark Green
  • Peach Fuzz
  • Spring Green (Dill)
  • Midnight Blue (Navy Blazer)

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.9 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 1080 x 2640
Aspect Ratio 20:9 22:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 81.4 % 84.9 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 413 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 165 Hz
Typical Brightness 400 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 3000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 84.02 mAh/in²
Battery Density 47.49 mAh/cm³ 44.42 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 4000 mAh
NFC Support No Yes
Chipset Unisoc Tiger T612 (12 nm) Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520)
GPU Mali-G57 Adreno 735

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features microUSB 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 14
Maximum OS Version 17

Comparison Summary

Let's dive into a comparative analysis of the Realme C31 and the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra, focusing on the user experience rather than just specs.

1. Design and Usability Assessment:

FeatureRealme C31Motorola Razr 50 UltraUser Experience Impact
Interface DesignStandard Android 11 skinAndroid 14 with Motorola customizationsRazr offers a potentially more updated and feature-rich software experience.
Interaction FlowBasic touch navigationTouch navigation optimized for foldable design, potentially with gesture controlsRazr's foldable design necessitates and allows for more complex, potentially more convenient interactions.
Accessibility FeaturesStandard Android accessibility optionsLikely includes Android 14 accessibility enhancements + potential foldable-specific featuresRazr may offer broader accessibility due to newer OS and unique form factor.
Design ErgonomicsTraditional candybar design, large footprintCompact when folded, expands for larger screen; lighterRazr prioritizes portability and one-handed usability when folded, offering flexibility. C31 is simpler, potentially more robust.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Scenario: Imagine a busy professional constantly on the move.

  • Realme C31: Our professional appreciates the C31's large battery (5000 mAh) providing ample power throughout the day. The phone fits comfortably in a bag, but its size might be cumbersome for quick, one-handed checks.
  • Razr 50 Ultra: Our professional loves how the Razr discreetly fits into a pocket. During a commute, they quickly check messages on the external display then seamlessly unfold the phone for a larger screen to join a video conference. The advanced camera system allows for high-quality video calls. However, battery life might be a concern with heavy usage.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

  • For a budget-conscious user: The Realme C31 provides essential smartphone functionality at an affordable price. Its simplicity might be preferable for users less interested in cutting-edge features.
  • For a tech-savvy user: The Razr 50 Ultra's foldable design, powerful processor, and advanced camera appeal to those seeking innovation and a premium experience. However, the higher price point might be a barrier.
  • For an older adult: The C31's larger, simpler design could be easier to handle and navigate. The Razr's small external display and complex folding mechanism might be challenging.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework:

  • Prioritize Simplicity and Affordability: Realme C31
  • Prioritize Innovation and Portability: Motorola Razr 50 Ultra

My Choice: As Sophia Rodriguez, I would choose the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra. While the price is significantly higher, its innovative foldable design aligns with my appreciation for user-centered design that pushes boundaries. The compact form factor, combined with the powerful processor and advanced camera system, offers a compelling blend of portability and performance. The potential trade-offs in battery life and durability are acknowledged, but the Razr's unique user experience outweighs these concerns for me. Its design embodies a forward-thinking approach to mobile technology, prioritizing both aesthetics and functionality in a way that resonates with my analytical framework.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.