Realme C31 vs Motorola Razr 40 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Realme C31
Realme C31
Realme
Motorola Razr 40
Motorola Razr 40
Motorola

General

Launch Date March 31, 2022 June 21, 2023
Release Year 2022 2023

Physical

Volume 105.28 cm³ 93.53 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.3 "/g 3.66 "/g
Weight 197 g 188.6 g
Height 164.7 mm 170.8 mm
Width 76.1 mm 74 mm
Thickness 8.4 mm 7.4 mm
Foldable Design No Yes
Available Colors
  • Light Silver
  • Dark Green
  • Sage Green
  • Vanilla Cream
  • Summer Lilac
  • Grape Compote
  • Cherry Blossom

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.9 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 1080 x 2640
Aspect Ratio 20:9 22:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 81.4 % 85.2 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 413 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 144 Hz
Typical Brightness 400 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 1400 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 88.22 mAh/in²
Battery Density 47.49 mAh/cm³ 44.91 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 4200 mAh
NFC Support No Yes
Chipset Unisoc Tiger T612 (12 nm) Qualcomm SM7450-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.36 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Mali-G57 Adreno 644

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features microUSB 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 13
Maximum OS Version 16

Comparison Summary

Realme C31 vs. Motorola Razr 40: A Tale of Two Experiences

Let's dive into the contrasting worlds of the Realme C31 and the Motorola Razr 40, not just as devices with specs, but as experiences crafted for different user narratives.

1. Design and Usability Assessment:

FeatureRealme C31Motorola Razr 40User Experience Impact
Interface DesignStandard Android 11 skin, likely with some Realme customizations.Android 13 with Motorola's clean, near-stock Android experience.Razr 40 offers a more modern, bloatware-free interface likely to receive longer software updates.
Interaction FlowBasic touch-based navigation, expected to be straightforward.Foldable design introduces new interaction paradigms with external and internal displays, potentially more complex but offering unique flexibility.Razr 40 offers a more adaptable user experience but with a learning curve for the folding mechanism.
Accessibility FeaturesStandard Android accessibility options. Fingerprint sensor.Standard Android accessibility options plus potential foldable-specific features. Fingerprint sensor.Both devices offer basic accessibility, but the Razr 40 may have unique advantages due to its form factor, yet to be fully explored.
Design ErgonomicsClassic slab design, familiar and comfortable for one-handed use for some users. Larger for pocket portability.Compact when folded, expands for larger screen experience. Lighter than the Realme C31 despite the complex hinge mechanism.Razr 40's portability excels due to its foldable design, but usability depends on individual preferences for compact versus large screen devices.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Realme C31: The Everyday Companion

Imagine a student needing a reliable device for note-taking, browsing, and staying connected. The Realme C31, with its large 5000mAh battery, promises a full day of use without the anxiety of a low battery warning. The Unisoc Tiger T612 chipset offers adequate performance for everyday tasks, while the triple camera system allows capturing memories with decent clarity. This is a device designed for practicality and endurance.

Motorola Razr 40: The Pocket Powerhouse

Picture a young professional constantly on the move, needing a device that seamlessly transitions from pocket to productivity. The Razr 40, with its sleek foldable design, offers a compact form factor for easy portability while expanding to a full 6.9-inch display for immersive work and entertainment. The powerful Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 chipset ensures smooth multitasking, while the advanced camera features capture stunning photos and videos. This is a device built for style, flexibility, and high performance in a compact package.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

Both devices cater to different audiences. The Realme C31 is a budget-friendly option for users prioritizing affordability and battery life. The Razr 40 appeals to those seeking cutting-edge technology, portability, and style, willing to invest more for a premium experience. For users with limited dexterity, the larger Realme C31 might be easier to handle, while the Razr 40's compact folded mode could be beneficial for one-handed use in certain situations.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework:

The choice between these devices boils down to personal priorities. If affordability, long battery life, and a familiar design are paramount, the Realme C31 is a sensible choice. If cutting-edge technology, portability, and a unique user experience are more important, the Razr 40 is the clear winner.

My Choice:

As Sophia Rodriguez, I would choose the Motorola Razr 40. While the Realme C31 offers excellent value, the Razr 40 represents a more innovative and exciting approach to mobile technology. Its foldable design, coupled with the powerful Snapdragon chipset and advanced features, creates a user experience that is both engaging and adaptable to various contexts. The compact form factor addresses a real need for portability in today's fast-paced world, without compromising on screen real estate when needed. This aligns with my mission to highlight design choices that enhance user interaction and advocate for intuitive technology. The higher price point is justified by the unique user experience and superior performance offered. The Razr 40 isn't just a phone; it's a statement about embracing innovative design and pushing the boundaries of mobile technology.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.