Realme 12 Pro vs Motorola Razr 50 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Realme 12 Pro
Realme 12 Pro
Realme
Motorola Razr 50
Motorola Razr 50
Motorola

General

Launch Date January 29, 2024 June 25, 2024
Release Year 2024 2024

Physical

Volume 105.17 cm³ 92.54 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.53 "/g 3.66 "/g
Weight 190 g 188.4 g
Height 161.5 mm 171.3 mm
Width 74 mm 74 mm
Thickness 8.8 mm 7.3 mm
Foldable Design No Yes
Available Colors
  • Submarine Blue
  • Navigator Beige
  • Koala Grey (Steel Wool)
  • Beach Sand (Pumice Stone)
  • Spritz Orange (Arabesque)

Display

Screen Size 6.7 " 6.9 "
Resolution 1080 x 2412 1080 x 2640
Aspect Ratio 20:9 22:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 90.4 % 84.9 %
Pixel Density 394 PPI 413 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 800 nits N/A
Peak Brightness 950 nits 3000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 111.38 mAh/in² 88.22 mAh/in²
Battery Density 47.54 mAh/cm³ 45.39 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 4200 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM6450 Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 7300X (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 710 Mali-G615 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 14 14
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureRealme 12 ProMotorola Razr 50Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions161.5 x 74 x 8.8 mm171.3 x 74 x 7.3 mm (folded)Razr 50 is significantly shorter when folded, enhancing portability. However, it's thicker when folded. Realme 12 Pro is a traditional slab design.
Weight190g188.4gNegligible weight difference.
FoldableNoYesRazr 50 offers a compact folded state and a larger screen when unfolded.
Display
Size6.7"6.9"Razr 50 offers a larger display area.
TypeAMOLED, 1B colors, 120HzFoldable LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120HzBoth offer smooth scrolling and vibrant colors. Razr 50's LTPO panel allows for dynamic refresh rate adjustment, potentially saving battery. Foldable nature introduces a crease.
Peak Brightness950 nits3000 nitsRazr 50 is significantly brighter, ensuring excellent outdoor visibility.
Resolution1080 x 24121080 x 2640Razr 50 has a slightly taller aspect ratio.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 6 Gen 1Dimensity 7300XBoth are mid-range chipsets. Dimensity 7300X potentially offers slightly better performance based on benchmarks (needs further verification with real-world tests).
CPUOcta-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Razr 50's CPU has slightly higher clock speeds, potentially resulting in faster app loading and multitasking.
GPUAdreno 710Mali-G615 MC2Performance differences likely minimal for average users; GPU intensive tasks might show variations (requires further benchmarking).
RAM8GB12GBRazr 50 offers more RAM, enabling better multitasking and smoother performance with demanding apps.
Storage256GB512GBRazr 50 doubles the storage capacity.
Battery
Capacity5000 mAh4200 mAhRealme 12 Pro has a larger battery, likely leading to longer battery life. Razr 50's smaller battery may be impacted by the larger, foldable display.
Other
OSAndroid 14Android 14Both run the latest Android version.
Fingerprint SensorUnder displaySide-mountedPreference-based.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Realme 12 Pro Advantages:

  • Longer Battery Life: Larger battery capacity suggests longer usage time.
  • Potentially Lower Price: While both are mid-range, non-folding phones generally come at a lower price point for comparable specifications.

Motorola Razr 50 Advantages:

  • Foldable Design: Offers portability and a larger screen when unfolded.
  • Brighter Display: Significantly brighter for better outdoor visibility.
  • More RAM and Storage: Better multitasking and more space for apps and files.
  • Slightly Faster CPU: Potentially quicker app loading and overall responsiveness.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Realme 12 Pro: Ideal for users prioritizing battery life, a traditional smartphone experience, and potentially a lower price point. Suitable for users who heavily use their phones throughout the day and need long battery endurance.

Motorola Razr 50: Ideal for users prioritizing portability, a large screen when needed, and the novelty of a foldable design. Best for users who value compactness and are willing to compromise on battery life for the form factor. Suitable for those who consume a lot of media or multitask on the go.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions:

  1. How important is portability? Foldable design matters if pocket space is a priority.
  2. How much do you prioritize battery life? Realme 12 Pro likely offers longer usage per charge.
  3. What is your budget? Foldable phones typically command a higher price.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Heavy user needing all-day battery: Realme 12 Pro
  • Trendy user wanting a compact, stylish phone: Motorola Razr 50
  • User on a budget needing a reliable device: Realme 12 Pro

My Choice: Realme 12 Pro

While the Razr 50 is intriguing with its foldable design, the Realme 12 Pro's significantly larger battery capacity is the deciding factor for me. I prioritize all-day battery life without needing to constantly worry about charging. The potential price difference further strengthens the appeal of the Realme 12 Pro. The performance differences between the two processors are likely negligible for my usage, and I prefer a traditional slab phone's reliability. The Razr 50's brighter screen is attractive, but battery life trumps that for my personal needs.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.